4,465
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Law and the complexities of parenting: parental status and parental function

&
Pages 391-406 | Published online: 09 Dec 2009

References

  • Agell , A. 1993 . “ Step-parenthood and biological parenthood: competition or cooperation ” . In Parenthood in Modern society: legal and social issues for the twenty first century , Edited by: Eekelaar , T. and Sarcevic , P. Dordrecht, Germany : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers .
  • Alghrani , A. 2008 . Regulating the reproductive revolution: ectogenesis – a regulatory minefield . Law and bioethics: current legal issues , 11 : 303 – 329 .
  • Alghrani , A. forthcoming . “ Assisted reproductive technologies and family formation: how womb transplant technology will transform the concept of the ‘family’ in far greater ways than the state could have envisaged ” . In Taking responsibility: law and the changing family , Edited by: Lind , C. , Keating , H. and Bridgeman , J. London : Ashgate .
  • Arnup , K. and Boyd , S. 1995 . “ Familial disputes? Sperm donors, lesbian mothers, and legal parenthood ” . In Legal inversions: lesbians, gay men, and the politics of law , Edited by: Herman , D. and Stychin , C. Philadelphia, PA : Temple University Press .
  • Bainham , A. 1999 . “ Parentage, parenthood and parental responsibility: subtle, elusive yet important distinctions ” . In What is a parent? , Edited by: Bainham , A. , Day Sclater , S. and Richards , M. Oxford : Hart Publishing .
  • Bainham , A. , Lindley , B. , Richards , M. and Trinder , L. , eds. 2003 . Children and their families: contact, rights and welfare , Oxford : Hart Publishing .
  • Barlow , A. and Duncan , S. 2000 . New Labour's communitarianism, supporting families and the ‘rationality mistake’: Part II . Journal of social welfare and family law , 22 ( 2 ) : 129 – 143 .
  • Barlow , A. , Duncan , S. , James , G. and Park , A. 2005 . Cohabitation, marriage and the law: social change and legal reform in the 21st century , Oxford : Hart Publishing .
  • Bridgeman , J. , Keating , H. and Lind , C. , eds. 2008 . Responsibility, law and the family , Aldershot : Ashgate Publishing .
  • Collier , R. and Sheldon , S. , eds. 2006 . Fathers' rights activism and law reform in comparative perspective , Oxford : Hart Publishing .
  • Collier , R. and Sheldon , S. 2008 . Fragmenting fatherhood: a socio-legal study , Oxford : Hart Publishing .
  • Dempsey , D. 2004 . Donor, father or parent? Conceiving paternity in the Australian family court . International journal of law, policy and the family , 18 : 76
  • Diduck , A. 2007 . ‘If only we can find the appropriate terms to use the issue will be solved’: law, identity and parenthood . Child and family law quarterly , 19 : 458
  • Eekelaar , J. 2001 . Rethinking Parental Responsibility . Family law , 31 : 426
  • Eekelaar , J. and Maclean , M. 1997 . The Parental obligation: a study of parenthood across households , Oxford : Hart Publishing .
  • Flowerdew , J. and Neale , B. 2003 . Trying to stay apace: children with multiple challenges in their post-divorce family lives . Childhood , 10 ( 2 ) : 147 – 161 .
  • Gibson , C. 1996 . “ Contemporary divorce and changing family patterns ” . In Divorce: where next? , Edited by: Freeman , M. Aldershot : Dartmouth Publishing .
  • Gilmore , S. 2003 . Parental responsibility and the unmarried father – a new dimension to the debate . Child and family law quarterly , 15 : 21
  • Kandel , R.F. 1994 . Which came first: the mother or the egg? A kinship solution to gestational surrogacy . Rutgers law review , 47 : 165
  • King , M. and Piper , C. 1995 . How the law thinks about children , Aldershot : Arena .
  • Lind , C. 2008 . “ Responsible fathers: paternity, the blood tie and family responsibility ” . In Responsibility, law and the family , Edited by: Bridgeman , J. , Keating , H. and Lind , C. 191 – 210 . Aldershot : Ashgate Publishing .
  • Northover , A. and Dennison , G. 2002 . Genetic testing and the impact on the family . Family Law , 32 : 752
  • Otlowski , M. 1999 . Re Evelyn – reflections on Australia's first litigated surrogacy case . Medical law review , 7 : 38 – 57 .
  • Probert , R. , Gilmore , S. and Herring , J. 2009 . Responsible parents and parental responsibility , Oxford : Hart Publishing .
  • Reece , H. 2009 . “ The degradation of parental responsibility ” . In Responsible parents and parental responsibility , Edited by: Probert , R. , Gilmore , S. and Herring , J. Oxford : Hart Publishing .
  • Smart , C. and Neale , B. 1999 . Family fragments , Cambridge : Polity Press .
  • Smart , C. and Sevenhuijsen , S. 1989 . Child custody and the politics of gender , London : Routledge .
  • Smith , C. and Logan , J. 2002 . Adoptive parenthood as a ‘legal fiction’ – its consequences for direct post-adoption contact . Child and family law quarterly , 14 ( 3 ) : 281
  • Smith , M. 2008 . “ Resident mothers in stepfamilies ” . In The international handbook of stepfamilies: policy and practice in legal, research and clinical environments , Edited by: Pryor , J. Hoboken, NJ : Wiley .
  • Sosson , J. 1993 . “ The legal status of step-families in continental European countries ” . In Parenthood in modern society: legal and social issues for the twenty first century , Edited by: Eekelaar , J. and Sarcevic , P. Dordrecht, Germany : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers .
  • Takala , T. and Gylling , H. 2000 . Who should know about our genetic makeup and why? . Journal of medical ethics , 26 : 171 – 174 .
  • Teubner , G. 1989 . How the law thinks: towards a constructivist epistemology of law . Law and society review , 23 ( 5 ) : 727 – 758 .
  • Wallbank , J. 2002 . Too many mothers? Surrogacy, kinship and the welfare of the child . Medical law review , 10 : 271
  • Wardle , L. 1993 . “ The evolving rights and duties of step-parents: making new rules for new families ” . In Parenthood in modern social issues for the twenty first century , Edited by: Eekelaar , J. and Sarcevic , P. Dordrecht, Germany : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers .
  • Wilkinson , R. 2010 . When is my genetic information your business? biological, emotional, and financial claims to knowledge . Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics , 19 : 1 – 8 . (forthcoming)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.