Divorce mediation: should we change our mind?

References

• Committee of Public Accounts . 2007 . Legal Services Commission: legal aid and mediation for people involved in family breakdown , London : HMSO . (Fifty-first report of Session 2006–7 HC 396)
   Google Scholar
• Crowley , L. 2009 . Collaborative law: the future cornerstone of the resolution process? . Judicial studies institute journal , 2009 ( 1 ) : 19 – 29 .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , G. 2000 . Monitoring publicly funded family mediation: report to the Legal Services Commission , London : Legal Services Commission .
   Google Scholar
• Dingwall , R. and Miller , G. 2001 . Lessons from brief therapy? Some interactional suggestions for family mediators . Conflict resolution quarterly , 19 ( 3 ) : 269 – 288 .
   Google Scholar
• Eekelaar , J.M. and Dingwall , R., . 1988 . “ The development of conciliation in England ” . In Divorce mediation and the legal process: British practice and international experience , Edited by: Dingwall , R. and Eekelaar , J.M. 3 – 22 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Eekelaar , J.M. , Maclean , M. and Beinart , S. 2000 . Family lawyers: the divorce work of solicitors , Oxford : Hart Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Greatbatch , D. and Dingwall , R. 1999 . The marginalization of domestic violence in divorce mediation . International journal of law, policy and the family , 13 ( 2 ) : 174 – 190 .
   Google Scholar
• Gribben , S. 2001 . Family mediation in England and Wales – some lessons for Australia . ADR bulletin , 4 ( 5 ) : 61 – 67 . Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Electronic Press
   Google Scholar
• Hammer , M. 1990 . Reengineering work: don't automate, obliterate . Harvard business review , 68 ( 4 ) : 104 – 112 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson , E. 2003 . Setting a standard or reflecting reality? The ‘role’ of divorce law, and the case of the Family Law Act 1996 . International journal of law, policy and the family , 17 ( 3 ) : 338 – 365 .
   Google Scholar
• Hasson , E. 2006 . Wedded to ‘fault’: the legal regulation of divorce and relationship breakdown . Legal studies , 26 ( 2 ) : 267 – 290 .
   Google Scholar
• Honeyman , C. 2007 . The next frontier is anticipation: thinking ahead about conflict to help clients find constructive ways to engage issues in advance . Alternatives , 25 ( 6 ) : 99 – 103 .
   Google Scholar
• Hunter , R. 2003 . Adversarial mythologies: policy assumptions and research evidence in family law . Journal of law and society , 30 ( 1 ) : 156 – 176 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly , J.B. 2004 . Family mediation research: is there empirical support for the field? . Conflict resolution quarterly , 22 ( 1–2 ) : 3 – 35 .
   Google Scholar
• Law Commission . 1990 . Family law: the ground for divorce , London : HMSO .
   Google Scholar
• Maclean , M. and Eekelaar , J.M. 2009 . Family law advocacy: how barristers help the victims of family failure , Oxford : Hart Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office (NAO) . 2007 . Legal Services Commission: legal aid and mediation for people involved in family breakdown , London : The Stationery Office . (Report by the Comptroller and Auditor-General, HC 256 Session 2006–7)
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades , H. 2010 . Mandatory mediation of family disputes: reflections from Australia . The journal of social welfare & family law , 32 ( 2 ) : 183 – 194 .
   Google Scholar
• Riskin , L.L. and Welsh , N.A. 2007 . Is that all there is? ‘The problem’ in court-oriented mediation . George Mason law review , 15 ( 4 ) : 863 – 932 .
   Google Scholar
• Salem , P. 2009 . The emergence of triage in family court services: the beginning of the end for mandatory mediation? . Family court review , 47 ( 3 ) : 371 – 388 .
   Google Scholar
• Saposnek , D.T. 2004 . Commentary: the future of the history of family mediation research . Conflict resolution quarterly , 22 ( 1–2 ) : 37 – 53 .
   Google Scholar
• Sarat , A. and Felstiner , W.L.F. 1995 . Divorce lawyers and their clients: power and meaning in the legal process , New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Tesler , P.H. 1999 . Collaborative law: a new paradigm for divorce lawyers . Psychology, public policy, and law , 5 ( 4 ) : 967 – 1000 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesler , P.H. 2001 . Collaborative law: achieving effective resolution in divorce without litigation , Washington, DC : American Bar Association .
   Google Scholar
• Trinder , L. 2006 . Making contact happen or making contact work? The process and outcomes of in-court conciliation , London : Department of Constitutional Affairs . (DCA Research Series 3/06)
   Google Scholar
• Trinder , L. , Firth , A., and Jenks , C. 2010 . ‘So presumably things have moved on since then?’ The management of risk allegations in child contact dispute resolution . International journal of law, policy and the family , 24 ( 1 ) : 29 – 53 .
   Google Scholar
• Trinder , L. and Kellett , J. 2007 . The longer-term outcomes of in-court conciliation , London : Ministry of Justice . (Ministry of Justice Research Series 15/07)
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J.A., et al., 2001. Information meetings & associated provisions within the Family Law Act 1996: final evaluation, Newcastle upon Tyne: Centre for Family Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
   Google Scholar
• Walker , J.A. , Stark , C.M., and Laing , K.A. 2004 . Picking up the pieces: marriage and divorce two years after information provision , London : Department of Constitutional Affairs .
   Google Scholar