‘It's like going through the abuse again’: domestic violence and women and children's (un)safety in private law contact proceedings

References

• AndersonL. (1997). Contact between children and violent fathers: In whose best interests?London: Rights of Women.
   Google Scholar
• ArisR., & HarrisonC. (2007). Domestic violence and the supplemental information form C1A: An evaluation of the use and effects of the introduction of the form into the family courts. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey-HarrisR. J., PearceJ. F., & BarronJ. R. (1999). From utility to rights? The presumption of contact in practice. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 13, 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/13.2.111.
   Google Scholar
• BuckleyH., HoltS., & WhelanS. (2007). Listen to me! children's experiences of domestic violence. Child Abuse Review, 16, 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.995.
   Google Scholar
• CobbS. (1997). The domestication of violence in mediation. Law and Society Review, 31, 397–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoyM., PerksK., ScottE., & TweedaleR. (2012). Picking up the pieces: Domestic violence and child contact. London: Rights of Women.
   Google Scholar
• CoyM., & KellyL. (2011). Islands in the stream: An evaluation of independent domestic violence advocacy schemes. London: Trust for London.
   Google Scholar
• CoyM., ThiaraR., KellyL., & PhillipsR. (2011). Into the foreground: An evaluation of the Jacana parenting programme. London: CWASU.
   Google Scholar
• EnanderV. (2010). Jekyll and hyde or “Who is this Guy?”—Battered women's interpretations of their abusive partners as a mirror of opposite discourses. Women's Studies International Forum, 33, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2009.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ErikssonM., & HesterM. (2001). Violent men as good-enough fathers?: A look at England and Sweden. Violence Against Women, 7, 779–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122182730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ErikssonM. (2009). Girls and boys as victims: Social workers' approaches to children exposed to violence. Child Abuse Review, 18, 428–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Family Justice Council. (2007). The availability of special facilities in county/combined and magistrates' courts. London: FJC.
   Google Scholar
• GreatbatchD., & DingwallR. (1999). The marginalization of domestic violence in divorce mediation. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 13, 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/13.2.174.
   Google Scholar
• HarrisonC. (2008). Implacably hostile or appropriately protective?: Women managing child contact in the context of domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 14, 381–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208314833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HesterM. (2011). The three planet model: Towards an understanding of contradictions in approaches to women and children's safety in contexts of domestic violence. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 837–853. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HesterM., & HarneL. (1996). Fatherhood, children and violence – The UK in an international perspective. In S.Watson & L.Doyal (Eds.), Engendering social policy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HM Courts & Tribunals Service. (n.d.). AJ25 Courts Charter – Family Courts. London: HM Courts & Tribunal Service. Retrieved from http://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/media/adobe_acrobat/r/t/Courts%20Charter%20Family%20AJ252Family.pdf [accessed18th July 2012].
   Google Scholar
• HMICA. (2005). Domestic violence, safety and family proceedings: Thematic review of the handling of domestic violence issues by the children and family court advisory and support service (CAFCASS) and the administration of family courts in her majesty's courts service (HMCS). London: HMCS.
   Google Scholar
• HMICA. (2008). The family courts – The experience of service users. London: HMCS.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2013). Guidance: Domestic Violence and Abuse. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/domestic-violence-and-abuse [accessed 17th January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• HuntJ. (2010). Parental perspectives on the family justice system in England and Wales: A review of research. Oxford: University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• HuntJ., & MacleodA. (2008). Outcomes of applications to court for contact orders after parental separation or divorce. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• HumphreysC., & ThiaraR. K. (2002). Routes to safety: Protection issues facing abused women and children and the role of outreach services. Bristol: Women's Aid Federation England.
   Google Scholar
• HumphreysC., & ThiaraR. K. (2003). Neither justice nor protection: Women's experiences of post-separation violence. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 25, 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964906032000145948.
   Google Scholar
• HumphreysC., MullenderA., ThiaraR. K., & SkamballisA. (2006). Talking to my mum: Developing communication between mothers and children in the aftermath of domestic violence. Journal of Social Work, 6, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017306062223.
   Google Scholar
• HunterR., & BarnettA. (2013). Fact-finding hearings and the implementation of the president's practice direction: Residence and contact orders: Domestic violence and harm. A report to the family justice council. London: FJC.
   Google Scholar
• JeffnerS. (2000). Different space for action: The everyday meaning of young people's perception of rape. Paper at ESS Faculty Seminar, University of North London, May.
   Google Scholar
• KayeM., StubbsJ., & TolmieJ. (2003). Domestic violence and child contact arrangements. Australian Journal of Family Law, 17, 93–133.
   Google Scholar
• KellyL. (1994). The interconnectedness of domestic violence and child abuse: Challenges for research, policy and practice. In A.Mullender & R.Morley (Eds.), Children living with domestic violence. London: Whiting and Birch.
   Google Scholar
• KellyL., SharpN., & KleinR. (2014). Finding the costs of freedom – How women and children rebuild their lives after domestic violence. London: Solace Women's Aid.
   Google Scholar
• McGeeC. (1997). National society for the prevention of cruelty to children, London, UK. Child Family Social Work, 2, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.1997.00037.x.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. (2009, November 25). Domestic violence and forced marriage newsletter. London: MoJ.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, Department for Education & Welsh Government. (2011). Family justice review: Final report. London: MOJ & DfE.
   Google Scholar
• MorrisA. (2009). Gendered dynamics of abuse and violence in families: Considering the abusive household gender regime. Child Abuse Review, 18, 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorrisP. (2011). They Didn't do it Then but They do it Now: Mediation and Violence. Paper delivered at the Socio-Legal Studies Association Annual Conference, University of Sussex, 14 April 2011.
   Google Scholar
• MullenderA., HagueG. M., ImamI., KellyL., MalosE. M., & Regan (2002). Children's perspectives on domestic violence. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2008). Omnibus Survey Report No. 38, Non-resident parental contact, 2007/8. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• PerryA., & RaineyB. (2007). Supervised, supported and indirect contact orders: Research findings. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 21, 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebl020.
   Google Scholar
• RadfordL., HesterM., HumphriesJ., & WoodfieldK-S. (1997). For the sake of the children: The law, domestic violence and child contact in England. Women's Studies International Forum, 20, 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00036-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rights of Women. (2010). Measuring up? UK compliance with international commitments on violence against women in England and Wales. London: ROW.
   Google Scholar
• Rights of Women. (2011). Women's access to justice: A research report. London: ROW. Retrieved from http://www.rightsofwomen.org.uk/pdfs/Policy/Womens_access_to_Justice-a_research_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• SaundersH. (2004). Twenty-nine child homicides: Lessons still to be learnt on domestic violence and child protection. Bristol: Women's Aid Federation of England.
   Google Scholar
• SaundersH., & BarronJ. (2003). Failure to protect?: Domestic violence and the experiences of abused women and children in the family courts. Bristol: Women's Aid Federation of England.
   Google Scholar
• StarkE. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SturgeC., & GlaserD. (2000). Contact and domestic violence: The experts' court report. Family Law, 30, 615–629.
   Google Scholar
• ThiaraR. K. (2010). Continuing control: Child contact and post-separation violence. In R. K.Thiara & A.Gill (Eds.), Violence against women in south asian communities: issues for policy and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Thiara, R. K., & Gill, A. (Eds.). (2010). Violence against women in south asian communities: issues for policy and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• ThiaraR. K., & GillA. (2012). Domestic violence, child contact, post-separation violence: Issues for South Asian and African-Caribbean women and children: A report of findings. London: NSPCC.
   Google Scholar
• TrinderL., FirthA., & JenksC. (2010). So presumably things have moved on since then?' the management of risk allegations in child contact dispute resolution. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 24, 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebp010.
   Google Scholar
• WilliamsonE. (2010). Living in the world of the domestic violence perpetrator: Negotiating the unreality of coercive control. Violence Against Women, 16, 1412–1423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210389162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar