From modern workplaces to modern families – re-envisioning the work–family conflict

References

• ACAS. (2014). Code of Practice 5, Handling in a reasonable manner requests to work flexibly.
   Google Scholar
• Bainham, A. (1995). Family law in a pluralistic society. Journal of Law and Society, 22, 234–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bainham, A. (2000). Family rights in the next millennium. Current Legal Issues, 53, 471–503.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, K. T. (1984). Rethinking parenthood as an exclusive status: The need for legal alternatives when the premise of the nuclear family has failed. Virginia Law Review, 70, 879–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney, N. (1988). Dual earning couples: Trends of change in Great Britain. Work, Employment and Society, 2, 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Borrell, K. (2010). Family and household: Family research and multi-household families. International Review of Sociology, 13, 467–480.
   Google Scholar
• Bumpass, L. L. (1990). What’s happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change. Demography, 27, 483–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caracciolo di Torella, E., & Foubert, P. (2015). Surrogacy, pregnancy and maternity rights: A missed opportunity for a more coherent regime of parental rights in the EU. European Law Review1, 52–69.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, R. (1999). Restructuring gender relations and employment: The decline of the male breadwinner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dallos, R., & Sapsford, R. (1997). Patterns of diversity and lived realities. In J. Muncie, M. Wetherell, M. Langan, R. Dallos, & A. Cochrane (Eds.), Understanding the family (pp. 125–170). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Diduck, A. (2003). Law’s families. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J. (1996). The state and the family, lecture to inaugurate the Institute’s annual theme for 1996–7, 30 October 1996. EdinburghL International Social Sciences Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. (1995). The neutered mother, the sexual family and other twentieth century tragedies. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, W. J. (1965). The family. London: Prentice-Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, J., & Laverty, J. (2003). Grandparents supporting working families, Satisfaction and choice in the provision of childcare. Family Matters No.66 Spring/Summer 2003, Australian Institute of Family Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K. (2003). Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, A. (2005). The changing availability of grandparents as carers and its implications for childcare policy in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 34, 557–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, B. (2014). New families and the welfare of children. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 36, 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hank, K., & Buber, I. (2009). Grandparents caring for their grandchildren: Findings from 2004 Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 53–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansard. (2013a). Children and Families Bill. Second reading, 25 February 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hansard. (2013b). Children and Families Bill. Committee stage, 7 March 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hantrais, L. (2004). Family policy matters: Responding to family change in Europe. Bristol: Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Hantrais, L., & Letablier, M.-T. (1996). Families and family policies in Europe. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, J. (2013). Caring and the law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government (2011). Consultation on modern workplaces. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government (2012a). Modern workplaces – government response on flexible parental leave. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2012b). Modern workplaces – government response on flexible working. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, S., & Hirst, M. (2000). Caring relationships over time: End of project report. DH 1746 7.00 SH/MH, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
   Google Scholar
• James, G. (2007). Law’s response to pregnancy/workplace conflicts: A critique. Feminist Legal Studies, 15, 167–188.
   Google Scholar
• León, M. (2005). Welfare state regimes and the social organization of labour: Childcare arrangements and the work/family balance. Sociological Review, 53, 204–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlynn, C. (2000). Ideologies of motherhood in European Community sex equality law. European Law Journal, 6, 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• McGlynn, C. (2006). Families and the European Union: Law, politics and pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKie, L., Cunningham-Burley, S., & McKendrick, J. H. (2005). Families and relationships: Boundaries and bridges. In L. McKie & S. Cunningham-Burley (Eds.), Families in society: Boundaries and relationships (pp. 3–18). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, M. (2008). The networked family: Reframing the legal understandings of caregiving and caregivers. Virginia Law Review, 94, 385–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, B. (2000). Theorising family, kinship and social change. Workshop Paper 6, ESRC Research Group on Care, Values and the Future of Welfare. University of Leeds. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/cava/papers/wsp6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, L. (1997). The myth of the traditional family. In H. L. Nelson (Ed.), Feminism and families (pp. 27–42). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donovan, K. (1993). Family law matters. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics and The NHS Information Centre. (2011). Survey of carers in households – England, 2009–10. [ HSCIC website]. Retrieved from http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB02200/surv-care-hous-eng-2009-2010-rep1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2014a). Key Statistics and Quick Statistics for local authorities in the United Kingdom - Part 3, 2011 census [ ONS website]. Retrieved from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/census/2011-census/key-statistics-and-quick-statistics-for-local-authorities-in-the-united-kingdom---part-3/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2014b). Families in the Labour Market, 2014 [ONS website]. Retrieved from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171776_388440.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2015). Families and Households, 2014 [ONS website]. Retrieved from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_393133.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1955). The American family: Its relations to personality and to the social structure. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family, socialization and interaction process (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, E., Speight, S., O’Brien, M., Connelly, S., & Aldrich, M. (2013). What do we know about non-resident fathers? Modern Fatherhood Briefing Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, R., & Rapoport, R. N. (1969). The dual career family: A variant pattern and social change. Human Relations, 22, 3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport, R., & Rapoport, R. N. (1976). Dual-career families re-examined: New integrations of work and family. London: Martin Robertson.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C., Neale, B., & Wade, A. (2001). The changing experience of childhood: Families and divorce. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Stang Dahl, T. (1987). Women’s law: An introduction to feminist jurisprudence. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (Jo Swinson), Hansard. (2013). Children and Families Bill. Committee stage, 23 April 2013. col. 706.
   Google Scholar
• TUC. (2013). Memorandum submitted by TUC on the Children and Families Bill. CF 80.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, L. (1995). Considering difference: The Case of the US Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. Social Politics, 2, 111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasoff, F., & Hill, M. (2002). Family policy in Scotland. Social Policy and Society, 1(3), 171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Weldon-Johns, M. (2011). The additional Paternity Leave Regulations 2010: a new dawn or more ‘sound-bite’ legislation? Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 33, 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Weldon-Johns, M. (2013). EU work–family policies – challenging parental roles or reinforcing gendered stereotypes? European Law Journal, 19, 662–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelock, J., & Jones, K. (2002). Grandparents are the next best thing’: Informal childcare for working parents in urban Britain. Journal of Social Policy, 31, 441–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Working Families. (2013). Memorandum submitted by Working Families on the Children and Families Bill. CF 64.
   Google Scholar