140
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General Section

Distributional impact assessments and the record of the Coalition Government: the tyranny of numbers without interpretation

References

  • Abbring, J., & Heckman, J. (2007). Econometric evaluation of social programs, part iii: Distributional treatment effects, dynamic treatment effects, dynamic discrete choice, and general equilibrium policy evaluation. Handbook of Econometrics, 6, 5145–5303.
  • Aldridge, H., & McInnes, T. (2014). Multiple cuts for the poorest families. Oxford: New Policy Institute/ Oxfam Research Report P3.
  • Arendt, H. (1970). On violence. New York, NY: Harvest Books, Harcourt, Brace and World.
  • Browne, J., & Levell, P. (2010). The distributional effects of tax and benefit reforms to be introduced between June 2010 and April 2014: A revised assessment. IFS briefing note BN108.
  • Butler, P. & Arnett, G. (2015, July 20). Lower benefit caps ‘will exclude poor families from large parts of England’. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jul/20/lower-benefit-caps-exclude-poor-families-make-cities-unaffordable
  • Carneiro, P., Hansen, K., & Heckman, J. (2001). Removing the veil of ignorance in assessing the distributional impacts of social policies. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 8, 273–301.
  • Cashmore, M., Richardson, T., Hilding-Ryedvik, T., & Emmelin, L. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments: Theorising the nature and implications of their political constitution. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30, 371–379.
  • Children’s Society. (2013). Numbers and proportions of children affected by the benefit cap. p. 1. Retrieved from http://www.childrenssociety.org.uk/news-and-blogs/press-release/benefit-cap-blunt-instrument
  • Cooper, N., & Dumpleton, S. (2013). Walking the breadline. The scandal of food poverty in 21st century Britain (pp. 1–17). Manchester, NH: Church Action on Poverty, Oxfam.
  • Cowell, F. A., & Gardiner, K. (1999, August). Welfare weights. Economics Research Paper 20. London School of Economics.
  • CSR. (2010). 2010 comprehensive spending review: Annex B. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/203826/Spending_review_2010.pdf
  • De Agostini, P., P.,Hills, & H., Sutherland. (2014). Were we really all in it together? The distributional effects of the UK coalition government’s tax-benefit policy changes. Social Policy in a Cold Climate series. Working paper 10. CASE/LSE.
  • Haugaard, M. (2003). Reflections on seven ways of creating power. European Journal of Social Theory, 6, 87–113.
  • Heckman, J., & Vytlacil, E. (2005, May). Structural equations, treatment effects and econometric policy evaluation. Econometrica 73, 669–738.
  • Heckman, J., & Vytlacil, E. (2007). Econometric evaluation of social programs, part I: Causal models, structural models and econometric policy evaluation. Handbook of econometrics, 6, 4779–4874. Elsevier.
  • HM Treasury. (2011). The green book: Appraisal and evaluation in Central Government. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/220541/green_book_complete.pdf
  • IAIA. (1999, January). International Association for Impact Assessment in cooperation with the Institute of Environmental Assessment UK. Retrieved from http://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/principlesEA_1.pdf
  • Browne, J., & Elming, W. (2015). The effect of the coalition’s tax and benefit changes on household incomes and work incentives ( pp. 1–31). IFS Briefing Note BN159. Institute of Fiscal Studies.
  • Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan Press.
  • O’Brien, M. (2013). Marcuse and the language of power: The unfair discourse of ‘fairness’ in the coalition governments’ policy presentation. Radical Philosophy Review, 16, 236–251.
  • Reed, H., & Portes, J. (2014). Cumulative impact assessment: A research report by Landman economics and the national institute of economic and social research (NIESR) for the equality Research report 94. Retrieved from https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/research-report-94-cumulative-impact-assessment.pdf
  • Rye, D. (2014). Political parties and the concept of power: A theoretical framework. Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Parsons, T. (1963). On the concept of political power. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 107, 232–262.
  • UN Women. (1995). The United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women: Action for Equality, Development and Peace. Beijing, China. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/institu.htm
  • Wolfe, I., Macfarlane, A., Donkin, A., Marmot, M., & Viner, R. (2014). Why children die: Death in infants, children and young people in the UK. Part A. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health / National Children’s Bureau / British Association for Child and Adolescent Public Health.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.