Reforming best interests: the road towards supported decision-making

References

• Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James [2013] UKSC 67.
   Google Scholar
• Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights: Mental Health and Human Rights, 2017. UN Doc A/HRC/34/32.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, M., & Kerzner, L. (2010). A new paradigm for protecting autonomy and the right to legal advancing substantive equality for persons with disabilities through law, policy and practice.
   Google Scholar
• Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118. Re A (Medical Treatment: Male Sterilisation), Re MM; Local Authority X v MM and KM [2007] EWHC 2003 (Fam)
   Google Scholar
• Cave, E. (2015). Determining capacity to make medical treatment decisions: Problems implementing the mental capacity act 2005. Statute Law Review, 36(1), 86–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, B. (2017). Disability and vulnerability: Challenging the capacity/incapacity binary. Social Policy and Society, 16(3), 469–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2014). General comment 1: Article 12 equal recognition before the law. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. (2006). GA res 61/106, un doc a/res/61/106. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Craigie, J. (2015). A fine balance: reconsidering patient autonomy in light of the un convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Bioethics, 29(6), 398–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, G., Kelly, B., Macdonald, G., Rizzo, M., Lombard, L., Abogunrin, O., … Martin, A. (2015). Supported decision-making: A review of the international literature. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 38, 61–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devi, N., Bickenbach, J., & Stucki, G. (2011). Moving towards substituted or supported decision-making? Article 12 of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Alter, 5(4), 249–264.
   Google Scholar
• Dinerstein, R. D. (2011). Implementing legal capacity under article 12 of the un convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: The difficult road from guardianship to supported decision-making. Human Rights Brief, 19(2), 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, M. (2009). Best interests, patient participation and the mental capacity act 2005. Medical Law Review, 17(1), 1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, M. (2011). Determining best interests under the mental capacity act 2005. Medical Law Review, 19(2), 304–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresser, R. (1993). Missing persons: Legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Rutgers Law Review, 46, 609–719.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. C., Kolappa, K., De Almeida, J. M. C., Kleinman, A., Makhashvili, N., Phakathi, S., … Thornicroft, G. (2015). Reversing hard won victories in the name of human rights: A critique of the general comment on article 12 of the un convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2(9), 844–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooding, P. (2015). Navigating the ‘flashing amber lights’ of the right to legal capacity in the United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities : Responding to major concerns. Human Rights Law Review, 15(1), 45–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust v JB [2014] EWHC 342 (COP).
   Google Scholar
• Herring, J. (2009). Losing it - losing what - the law and Dementia. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 21(1), 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords Select Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005. (2014). Mental capacity act 2005: Post-legislative scrutiny. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Council Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 28 September 2017 36/13. Mental health and human rights, 2017. UN Doc A/HRC/RES/36/13.
   Google Scholar
• Law Commission, 1995. Mental Incapacity (Law Com No 231). London.
   Google Scholar
• Law Commission, 2015. Mental Capacity and Deprivation of Liberty (Consultation Paper No.222). London.
   Google Scholar
• Law Commission, 2017. Mental Capacity and Deprivation of Liberty (Law Com No 372).
   Google Scholar
• A Local Authority v K (by the Official Solicitor) [2013] EWHC 242 (COP).
   Google Scholar
• Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice. (2007). London: TSO, Department of Constitutional Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• An NHS Trust v DE [2013] EWHC 2562 (Fam).
   Google Scholar
• Pretty v United Kingdom [2002] 2 FCR 97.
   Google Scholar
• Re A (Medical Treatment: Male Sterilisation) [2000] 1 FCR 193.
   Google Scholar
• Re C; Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v C [2015] EWCOP 80.
   Google Scholar
• Re M [2009] EWHC 2525 (Fam).
   Google Scholar
• Re MB (An Adult: Medical Treatment) [1997] 2 FCR 541.
   Google Scholar
• Re MM; Local Authority X v MM and KM [2007] EWHC 2003 (Fam).
   Google Scholar
• Re P [2009] EWHC 163 (Ch).
   Google Scholar
• Re S and Another (Protected Persons) [2008] EWHC 816 (Fam).
   Google Scholar
• Re SB (A Patient; Capacity to Consent to Termination) [2013] EWHC 1417 (COP).
   Google Scholar
• Re Z [2016] EWCOP 4.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, G. (2012). Mental disabilities and the law: From substitute to supported decision-making? Current Legal Problems, 65, 333–354.
   Google Scholar
• Scholten, M., & Gather, J. (2017). Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward. Journal of Medical Ethics. medethics-2017-104414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Series, L. (2015). Relationships, autonomy and legal capacity: Mental capacity and support paradigms. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 40, 80–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtukaturov v Russia (2012) 54 EHRR 27.
   Google Scholar
• St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust v S; Regina v Collins [1999] Fam 26.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. J. (2016). What are ‘best interests’? a critical evaluation of ‘best interests’ decision-making in clinical practice. Medical Law Review, 24(2), 176–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildeman, S. (2013). Protecting rights and building capacities : Challenges to in light of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, (1), 48–73. Spring.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, V., Boyle, G., Jepson, M., Swift, P., Williamson, T., & Heslop, P. (2014). Best interests decisions: Professional practices in health and social care. Health & Social Care in the Community, 22(1), 78–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X NHS Trust v B [2015] EWCOP 60.
   Google Scholar