References
- All-Party Parliamentary Group on Domestic Violence. (2016). Domestic abuse, child contact and the family courts. Retrieved from https://www.womensaid.org.uk/appg-reports/
- Anderson, L. (1997). Contact between children and violent fathers. London: Rights of Women.
- Aris, R., & Harrison, C. (2007). Domestic violence and the supplemental information form. London: Ministry of Justice.
- Atkin, B. (2015). The revised family court system in New Zealand: Secret justice and privatisation. In M. Maclean, J. Eekelaar, & B. Bastard (Eds.), Delivering family justice in the 21st century (pp. 39–50). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Bailey-Harris, R., Barron, J., & Pearce, J. (1999). From utility to rights? The presumption of contact in practice. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 13, 111–131.
- Bailey-Harris, R., Davis, G., Barron, J., & Pearce, J. (1998). Monitoring private law applications under the Children Act 1989: Report to the Nuffield Foundation. Bristol: University of Bristol.
- Barlow, A., Hunter, R., Smithson, J., & Ewing, J. (2017). Mapping paths to family justice: Resolving family disputes in neoliberal times. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Barnett, A. (2000). Contact and domestic violence: The ideological divide. In J. Bridgeman & D. Monk (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on family law (pp. 129–150). London: Cavendish.
- Barnett, A. (2014). Contact at all costs? Domestic violence and children’s welfare. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 26, 439–462.
- Barnett, A. (2015). ‘Like gold dust these days’: Domestic violence fact-finding hearings in child contact cases. Feminist Legal Studies, 23, 47–78.
- Barnett, A. (2016). Family law without lawyers – A systems theory perspective. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 39, 223–245.
- Barnett, A. (2017). ‘Greater than the mere sum of its parts’: Coercive control and the question of proof. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 29, 379–400.
- Cafcass & Women’s Aid. (2017). Allegations of domestic abuse in child contact cases. Retrieved from Cafcass website: https://www.cafcass.gov.uk/news/2017/july/cafcass-and-women%E2%80%99s-aid-collaborate-on-domestic-abuse-research.aspx
- Cobb, S. (2016) Review of Practice Direction 12J FPR 2010 Child arrangement and contact orders: Domestic violence and harm – Report to the President of the Family Division. Retrieved from Judiciary website: https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwih5NCT2LnYAhVDZFAKHXc8DYIQFggnMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.judiciary.gov.uk%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F01%2FPD12J-child-arrangement-domestic-violence-and-harm-report-and-revision.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3GGfqkjjIFtgC6uxlGITl5
- Conner, D. (2009). Abuse and discretion: Evaluating judicial discretion in custody cases involving violence against women. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and Law, 17, 163–228.
- Corbett, N. E., & Summerfield, A. (2017). Alleged perpetrators of abuse as litigants in person in private family law: The cross-examination of vulnerable and intimidated witnesses. London: Ministry of Justice.
- Coy, M., Perks, K., Scott, E., & Tweedale, R. (2012). Picking up the pieces: Domestic violence and child contact. London: Rights of Women. Retrieved from: http://rightsofwomen.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Picking_Up_the_Pieces_Report-2012l.pdf
- Craig, J. (2007). Everybody’s business: Applications for contact orders by consent. Family Law, 37, 26–30.
- Davis, G., Lidzas, J., Tibbetts, S., Murphy, J., & Yauch, J. (2010). The dangers of presumptive joint physical custody. Minneapolis: The Battered Women’s Justice Project. Retrieved from : http://www.bwjp.org/assets/documents/pdfs/dangers_presumptive_joint_physical_custody.pdf
- Department of Constitutional Affairs, & Department for Education and Skills. (2004). The Government’s response to the Children Act Sub-Committee (‘CASC’) Report: ‘Making contact work’. London: DCA & DfES.
- Eaton, D., Jarmain, S., & Lustigman, L. (2016). Parental alienation: Surely the time has come to effect change? Family Law, 46, 581–583.
- Family Justice Review. (2011). Family Justice Review Final Report. London: Ministry of Justice, Department for Education, Welsh Government.
- Garvin, Z. (2016). The unintended consequences of rebuttable presumptions to determine child custody in domestic violence cases. Family Law Quarterly, 50, 173–192.
- Harding, M., & Newnham, A. (2015). How do county courts share the care of children between parents? Full report. Coventry: University of Warwick. Retrieved from Nuffield Foundation website: http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Full%20report.pdf
- Harrison, C. (2008). Implacably hostile or appropriately protective?: Women managing child contact in the context of domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 14, 381–405.
- Hester, M. (2011). The three planet model: Towards an understanding of contradictions in approaches to women and children’s safety in contexts of domestic violence. The British Journal of Social Work, 41, 837–853.
- Hester, M., & Radford, R. (1996). Domestic violence and child contact arrangements in England and Denmark. Bristol: The Policy Press.
- HM Government. (2014). A call to end violence against women and girls. Retrieved from UK Government website: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/287758/VAWG_Action_Plan.pdf)
- HM Government. (2016). Ending violence against women and girls strategy 2016-2020. Retrieved from UK Government website: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/strategy-to-end-violence-against-women-and-girls-2016-to-2020
- HM Inspectorate of Court Administration. (2005). Domestic violence, safety and family proceedings: Thematic review of the handling of domestic violence issues by the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) and the administration of family courts in Her Majesty’s Courts Service (HMCS). London: HMICA.
- House of Commons. (2017). Domestic violence victims: Cross-examination. London: Hansard, Vol. 619. Retrieved from Hansard website: https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-01-09/debates/8054FB6E-0CDD-4E9B-A6C3-393558156BBD/DomesticViolenceVictimsCross-Examination
- Humphreys, C., & Harrison, C. (2003). Squaring the circle – Contact and domestic violence. Family Law, 33, 419–423.
- Hunt, J., & Macleod, A. (2008). Outcomes of applications to court for contact orders after parental separation or divorce. London: Ministry of Justice.
- Hunter, R., & Barnett, A. (2013). Fact-finding hearings and the implementation of the President’s Practice Direction: Residence and contact orders: Domestic violence and harm. London: Family Justice Council. Retrieved from Kent Academic Repository website: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/35678/1/FFH%20report%20January%202013.pdf
- Iwi, K., & Newman, C. (2015). Engaging with perpetrators of domestic violence: Practical techniques for early intervention. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
- Kaganas, F., & Piper, C. (1999). Divorce and domestic violence. In S. Day Sclater & C. Piper (Eds.), Undercurrents of divorce (pp. 183–207). Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Kaganas, F., & Day Sclater, S. (2004). Contact disputes: Narrative constructions of ‘good’ parents. Feminist Legal Studies, 12, 1–27.
- Lamprecht, R. (2011). Advancing the best interests of the child: Why South Dakota should strengthen its rebuttable presumption against awarding custody to abusive parents. South Dakota Law Review, 56, 351–379.
- Lemon, N. (2001). Statutes creating rebuttable presumptions against custody to batterers: How effective are they? William Mitchell Law Review, 28, 601–676.
- Local Government Association, Cafcass, & Women’s Aid. (2006). Vision for services for children and young people affected by domestic violence. London: Local Government Association.
- Lord Chancellor’s Advisory Board on Family Law, Children Act Sub-Committee. (2001). Guidelines for good practice on parental contact in cases where there is domestic violence. London: TSO.
- Ministry of Justice. (2012). Judicial and court statistics 2011. Retrieved from UK Government website: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/217494/judicial-court-stats-2011.pdf
- Ministry of Justice. (2017). Family court statistics quarterly, England and Wales, January to March 2017. Retrieved from UK Government website: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/family-court-statistics-quarterly-january-to-march-2017
- Morrill, A., Dai, J., Dunn, S., Sung, I., & Smi, K. (2005). Child custody and visitation decisions when the father has perpetrated violence against the mother. Violence Against Women, 11, 1076–1107.
- Perry, A. (2006). Safety first? Contact and family violence in New Zealand: An evaluation of the presumption against unsupervised contact. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 18, 1–21.
- Perry, A., & Rainey, B. (2007). Supervised, supported and indirect contact orders: Research findings. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 21, 21–47.
- Robertson, N., Busch, R., D’Souza, R., Lam Sheung, F., Anand, R., Balzer, R., & Paina, D. (2007). Living at the cutting edge: Women’s experiences of protection orders, Volume 2: What’s to be done? A critical analysis of statutory and practice approaches to domestic violence. Hamilton, NZ: University of Waikato.
- Saunders, H. (2004). Twenty-nine child homicides: Lessons still to be learnt on domestic violence and child protection. Bristol: Women’s Aid Federation of England.
- Sturge, C., & Glaser, D. (2000). Contact and domestic violence – The experts’ court report. Family Law, 30, 615–629.
- Thiara, R., & Gill, A. (2012). Domestic violence, child contact, post-separation violence: Experiences of South Asian and African-Caribbean women and children. London: NSPCC. Retrieved from NSPCC website: https://www.nspcc.org.uk/globalassets/documents/research-reports/domestic-violence-child-contact-post-separation-violence-report.pdf
- Trinder, L., Connolly, J., Kellet, J., & Thoday, C. (2004). Families in contact disputes: A profile. Family Law, 34, 877–881.
- Trinder, L., Firth, A., & Jenks, C. (2009). Opening closed doors: A micro analytic investigation of dispute resolution in child contact cases. ESRC End of Award Report, RES-000-22-2646. Swindon: ESRC.
- Trinder, L., Hunt, J., Macleod, A., Pearce, J., & Woodward, H. (2013). Enforcing contact orders: Problem-solving or punishment? Exeter: University of Exeter.
- Trinder, L., Hunter, R., Hitchings, E., Miles, J., Moorhead, R., Smith, L., … Pearce, J. (2014). Litigants in person in private family law cases. London: Ministry of Justice. Retrieved from UK Government webiste: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/380479/litigants-in-person-in-private-family-law-cases.pdf
- Wall, N. (2010). The President‘s guidance in relation to split hearings. London: Judicial Office.
- Women’s Aid. (2016). Nineteen child homicides: What must change so children are put first in child contact arrangements and the family courts. Bristol: Women's Aid.
- Women’s Aid. (2017). Child first: A call to action one year on. Bristol: Women’s Aid.
- Young, S. (2004/2005). A presumption for supervised visitation in Texas: Understanding and strengthening family code section 153.004(e). Texas Tech Law Review, 37, 327–355.