Specialised domestic violence courts in Canada and the United States: Key factors in prioritising safety for women and children

References

• Aldrich, L., & Kluger, J. H. (2010). New York’s one judge-one family response to family violence. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 61, 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bala, N., Birnbaum, R., & Martinson, D. (2010). One judge for one family: Differentiated case management for families in continuing conflict. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 26, 395–450.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, C., Walsh, M. E., Ballard, R. H., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Applegate, A. G., & Putz, J. W. (2010). Divorce mediation with or without legal representation: A focus on intimate partner violence and abuse. Family Court Review, 48, 631–645.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, D. (2012). Imagining courts that work for women survivors of violence. Vancouver: Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R., Bala, N., & Jaffe, P. (2014). Establishing Canada’s first integrated domestic violence court: Exploring process, outcomes, and lessons learned. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 29, 117–171.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R., Saini, M., & Bala, N. (2017). Canada’s first integrated domestic violence court: Examining family and criminal court outcomes at the Toronto IDVC. Journal of Family Violence, 32, 621–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, S. B., & Lindy, R. (2016). Violence against women and the BC Family Law Act: Early jurisprudence. Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 35, 101–138.
   Google Scholar
• Breger, M., Elkins, L., & Fosbinder, J. (2010-2011). New York law of domestic violence (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). New York: Thomson/West.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2000). Charging and prosecution policies in cases of spousal assault: A synthesis of research, academic, and judicial responses. Ottawa: Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Busby, K., Koshan, J., & Wiegers, W. (2008). Civil domestic violence legislation in the Prairie Provinces: A comparative legal analysis. In J. Ursel, L. M. Tutty, & J. Lemaistre (Eds.), What’s law got to do with it? The law, specialized courts and domestic violence in Canada (pp. 197–227). Toronto: Cormorant Books.
   Google Scholar
• Calder, G., & Boyd, S. B. (2018, January 3). Comment: Connecting the dots in family-violence cases. Times Colonist. Retrieved from: http://www.timescolonist.com/opinion/op-ed/comment-connecting-the-dots-in-family-violence-cases-1.23134672.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Court Innovation. (2005). Key principles of domestic violence court: Accountability. New York: Author. Retrieved from https://www.courtinnovation.org/articles/key-principles-domestic-violence-court-accountability?mode=7&type=art&url=research/7/article
   Google Scholar
• Center for Court Innovation. (2009). A national compendium of domestic violence courts. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Court Innovation. (2011a). Civil domestic violence courts: Key principles. Retrieved from: https://www.courtinnovation.org/sites/default/files/documents/DV_Civil_Fact_Sheet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Court Innovation. (2011b). Criminal domestic violence courts: Key principles. Retrieved from: https://www.courtinnovation.org/sites/default/files/documents/DV_Criminal_Fact_Sheet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Court Innovation. (2011c). Integrated domestic violence courts: Key principles. Retrieved from: http://www.courtinnovation.org/sites/default/files/documents/IDV_FACT_SHEET.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cissner, A., Labriola, M., & Rempel, M. (2013). Testing the effects of New York’s domestic violence courts: A statewide impact evaluation. New York: Center for Court Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Cissner, A., Picard-Fritsche, S., & Puffett, N. K. (2011). The Suffolk County integrated domestic violence court: Policies, practices, and impacts. New York: Center for Court Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Cissner, A., Picard-Fritsche, S., & Rempel, M. (2014). New York State’s integrated domestic violence court model: Results from four recent studies. Domestic Violence Report, 19(4), 51–54.
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland, A. (2010). Specialization has the potential to lead to uneven justice: Domestic violence cases in the juvenile & domestic violence courts. The Modern American, 6, 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Coker, D. (2001). Crime control and feminist law reform in domestic violence law: A critical Review. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 4, 801–860.
   Google Scholar
• Coll, K., & Stewart, R. (2007). Ada County family violence court comprehensive evaluation report. Retrieved from: https://isc.idaho.gov/dv_courts/FVC_Comprehensive_Eval_Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton v Berry (2017) BCSC 907.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, D. (1990). Battered women and the state: From the failure of theory to a theory of failure. Critical Criminology, 1(2), 77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Dalley, J. (2013). One family, one judge: Towards a new model for access to justice for families facing violence in BC. Appeal, 18, 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dunford-Jackson, B. L., Frederick, L., Hart, B., & Hofford, M. (1998-1999). Unified family courts: How will they serve victims of domestic violence. Family Law Quarterly, 32, 131–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, D. (1999). Effective intervention in domestic violence cases: Rethinking the roles of prosecutors, judges and the court system. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 11, 3–50.
   Google Scholar
• Evaluation Division, Office of Strategic Planning and Performance Management. (2009). The unified family court summative evaluation: Final report. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Goodmark, L. (2004). Law is the answer? Do we know that for sure? Questioning the efficacy of legal interventions for battered women. St Louis University Public Law Review, 23, 7–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hester, M. (2009). The contradictory legal worlds faced by domestic violence victims. In E. Stark & E. S. Buzawa (Eds.), Violence against women in families and relationships: The family context (Vol. 2, pp. 127–146). Denver: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman, E. M., & Aldrich, L. (2011). Rethinking access to justice: The need for a holistic response to victims of domestic violence. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 33, 449–462.
   Google Scholar
• Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. (2007). Access to justice for women victims of violence in the Americas. OEA/Ser L/V/II doc 68. Washington: Organization of American States.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M., & Martinson, D. (2015). Risk of future harm: Family violence and information sharing between family and criminal courts. Vancouver: FREDA Centre for Research on Violence against Women and Children.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, P., Crooks, C., & Bala, N. (2008). Domestic violence and child custody disputes: The need for a new framework for the family court. In J. Ursel, L. M. Tutty, & J. Lemaistre (Eds.), What’s law got to do with it? The law, specialized courts and domestic violence in Canada (pp. 254–271). Toronto: Cormorant Books.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, S., & Rempel, M. (2011). The impact of integrated domestic violence courts on case outcomes: Results for nine New York State courts. New York: Center for Court Innovation. Retrieved from https://www.courtinnovation.org/sites/default/files/documents/Nine_IDV.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Keilitz, S., Guerrero, R., Jones, A. M., & Rubio, D. M. (2000). Specialization of domestic violence case management in courts: A national survey. Williamsburg: National Center for State Courts.
   Google Scholar
• Koshan, J. (2014). Investigating integrated domestic violence courts: Lessons from New York. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 51, 989–1036.
   Google Scholar
• Koshan, J., & Wiegers, W. (2007). Theorizing civil domestic violence legislation in the context of restructuring: A tale of two Provinces. Canadian Journal of Women & the Law, 19, 145–178.
   Google Scholar
• Labriola, M., Bradley, S., O’Sullivan, C. S., Rempel, M., & Moore, S. (2009). A national portrait of domestic violence courts. New York: Center for Court Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Levey, L., Steketee, M. W., & Keilitz, S. L. (2001). Lessons learned in implementing an integrated domestic violence court: The District of Columbia experience. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, F., Ross, T., & Guthrie, P. (2008). Enhancing safety and justice for victims of domestic violence: Voices of women in the Queen’s integrated domestic violence court. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• MacDowell, E. (2011). When courts collide: Integrated domestic violence courts and court pluralism. Texas Journal of Women & the Law, 20, 95–130.
   Google Scholar
• Martinson, D. (2012). Judicial coordination of concurrent proceedings in domestic violence cases. Vancouver: The FREDA Centre for Research on Violence against Women and Children.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, R., & Aldrich, L. (2003). What makes a domestic violence court work? Lessons from New York. Judges Journal, 42, 5–42.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S. (2009). Two decades of specialized domestic violence courts: A review of the literature. New York: Center for Court Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Mosher, J. (2015). Grounding access to justice theory and practice in the experiences of women abused by their intimate partners. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 32, 149–179.
   Google Scholar
• Mosoff, J., Grant, I., Boyd, S. B., & Lindy, R. (2017). Intersecting challenges: Mothers and child protection law in BC. University of British Columbia Law Review, 50, 435–504.
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, L. (2012). Enhancing safety: When domestic violence cases are in multiple legal systems (criminal, family, child protection). London, ON: Centre for Research & Education on Violence against Women and Children.
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, L. (2014). At cliff’s edge: Judicial dispute resolution in domestic violence cases. Family Court Review, 52, 529–563.
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, L. (2015). Enhancing civil protection in domestic violence cases: Cross Canada checkup. Fredericton: Muriel McQueen Fergusson Centre for Family Violence Research.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, K., Tutty, L., Weaver-Dunlop, G., & Walsh, C. (2007). Do good intentions beget good policy? A review of child protection policies to address intimate partner violence. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 1469–1486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ontario, C. C. (2015). Domestic violence death review committee 2013-14 annual report. Toronto: Ministry of Community Safety & Correctional Services.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Court of Justice. (n.d.). Integrated domestic violence courts: Overview. Retrieved from: Ontario Court of Justice, http://www.ontariocourts.ca/ocj/integrated-domestic-violence-court/overview/.
   Google Scholar
• Picard-Fritsche, S. (2011). Litigant perspectives in an integrated domestic violence court. New York: Center for Court Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Picard-Fritsche, S., Cissner, A. B., & Puffett, N. K. (2011). The Erie County integrated domestic violence court: Policies, practices, and impacts. New York: Center for Court Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Quann, N. (2006). Offender profile and recidivism among domestic violence offenders in Ontario, Canada. Ottawa: Department of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/crime/rr06_fv3-rr06_vf3/rr06_fv3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rickard, E. (2011). Civil protective orders in integrated domestic violence court: An empirical study. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1782212.
   Google Scholar
• Sack, E. (2002). Creating a domestic violence court: Guidelines and best practices. San Francisco: Family Violence Prevention Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Sack, E. (2004). Battered women and the state: The struggle for the future of domestic violence policy. Wisconsin Law Review, 2004, 1657–1739.
   Google Scholar
• Saini, M., Birnbaum, R., & Bala, N. (2016). Access to justice in Ontario’s family courts: The parents’ perspective. Windsor Review of Legal & Social Issues, 37, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Schlueter, M., Wicklund, P., Adler, R., Owen, J., & Halvorsen, T. (2011). Bennington County integrated domestic violence docket project: Outcome evaluation - final report. Northfield Falls: Vermont Center For Justice Research.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, E. (2000). Battered women and feminist lawmaking. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, C. (2004). Therapeutic domestic violence courts: An efficient approach to adjudication? Seattle University Law Review, 27, 981–997.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, D. (2007). The current state of domestic violence courts in the United States, 2007. Williamsburg: National Center for State Courts.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, B. (2000). The trend toward specialized domestic violence courts: Improvements on an effective innovation. Fordham Law Review, 68, 1285–1327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turpel-Lafond, M. E. (2009). Honouring Christian Lee – No private matter: Protecting children living with domestic violence. Victoria: BC Representative for Children and Youth.
   Google Scholar
• Turpel-Lafond, M. E. (2012). Honouring Kaitlynne, Max and Cordon: Make their voices heard now. Victoria: BC Representative for Children and Youth.
   Google Scholar
• Tutty, L., Ursel, J., & Douglas, F. (2008). Specialized domestic violence courts: A comparison of models. In J. Ursel, L. M. Tutty, & J. Lemaistre (Eds.), What’s law got to do with it? The law, specialized courts and domestic violence in Canada (pp. 69–94). Toronto: Cormorant Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tutty, L., Ursel, J., & Lemaistre, J. (2008). The verdict on specialized justice responses to domestic violence. In J. Ursel, L. M. Tutty, & J. Lemaistre (Eds.), What’s law got to do with it? The law, specialized courts and domestic violence in Canada (pp. 272–278). Toronto: Cormorant Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tutty, L., & Koshan, J. (2013). Calgary’s specialized domestic violence court: An evaluation of a unique model. Alberta Law Review, 50, 731–755.
   Google Scholar
• Ursel, J., Tutty, L., & Lemaistre, J. (2008). The justice system response to domestic violence: Debates, discussions and dialogues. In J. Ursel, L. M. Tutty, & J. Lemaistre (Eds.), What’s law got to do with it? The law, specialized courts and domestic violence in Canada (pp. 1–17). Toronto: Cormorant Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vollens, A. (2010). Court-related abuse and harassment. Vancouver: YWCA. Retrieved from
   Google Scholar
• Weber, J. (2000). Courts responding to communities: Domestic violence courts: Components and considerations. Journal of the Center for Families, Children & Courts, 2, 23–139.
   Google Scholar
• Weissman, D. (2000-2001). Gender-based violence as judicial anomaly: Between ‘the truly national and the truly local’. Boston College Law Review, 42, 1081–1159.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, R., Aldrich, L., & Moore, S. (2004). Planning a domestic violence court: The New York State experience. New York: Center for Court Innovation.
   Google Scholar