Specialist domestic violence courts for child arrangement cases:safer courtrooms and safer outcomes?

References

• All Party Parliamentary Group on Domestic Violence (APPG) & Women’s Aid. (2016). Domestic abuse, child contact and the family courts: Parliamentary briefing. London: APPG and Women’s Aid.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, A. (2014). Contact at all costs? Domestic violence and children’s welfare. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 26, 439–462.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, A. (2017). ‘Greater than the sum of its parts’: Coercive control and the question of proof. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 29, 379–400.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinson, V. (2016). Surviving times of austerity: Preserving the specialist domestic violence court provision. In S. Hilder & V. Bettinson (Eds.), Domestic violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives on protection, prevention and intervention (pp. 81–103). London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinson, V., & Bishop, C. (2015). Is the creation of a discrete offence of coercive control necessary to combat domestic violence? Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 66, 179–197.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinson, V., & Bishop, C. (2018). Evidencing domestic violence, including the behaviour that falls under the new offence of ‘controlling and coercive behaviour’. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 22, 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, M. (2004). Lomas v Parle – Coherent and effective remedies for victims of domestic violence: Time for an integrated domestic violence court? Child and Family Law Quarterly, 16, 317–329.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, M. (2006). Judicial monitoring of compliance: Introducing ‘problem solving’ approaches to domestic violence courts in England and Wales. International Journal of Law, Policy and Family, 20, 366–378.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, M. (2008). Legal responses to domestic violence. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, M. (2010). Commentary on R v Dhaliwal. In R. Hunter, C. McGlynn, & E. Rackley (Eds.), Feminist judgments: From theory to practice (pp. 255–260). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhry, S., & Herring, J. (2017). A human right to legal aid: The implications of changes to the legal aid scheme for victims of domestic abuse. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 39, 152–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, M. J. (2017). Review of Practice Direction 12J FPR 2010: Child arrangement and contact orders: Domestic violence and harm. Report to the President of the Family Division. Retrieved from https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/PD12J-child-arrangement-domestic-violence-and-harm-report-and-revision.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D. (2003). Evaluation of Wolverhampton Specialist Domestic Violence Court, RRI, University of Wolverhampton.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D., Burton, M., Robinson, V., & Vallely, C. (2004). Evaluation of specialist domestic violence courts/fast track systems. London: Crown Prosecution Service and Department for Constitutional Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Cretney, S., & Davis, A. (1997). Prosecuting domestic assault: Victims failing courts or courts failing victims? Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 146–157.
   Google Scholar
• Crown Prosecution Service. (2017). Violence against women report 2016-7. London: CPS.
   Google Scholar
• Crown Prosecution Service, Her Majesty’s Court Service, & Home Office. (2008). Safety with justice. London: CPS, HMCS and Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Crown Prosecution Service, Her Majesty’s Court Service, & Home Office. (2011). Domestic Violence Courts national resource manual, revised. London: CPS, HMCS and Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Donoghue, J. (2014). Transforming criminal justice? Problem-solving and court specialisation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, L. (2002). Prosecuting domestic violence without victim participation. Modern Law Review, 65, 834–858.
   Google Scholar
• Grundy, M. (2000). Final evaluation report of leeds domestic violence cluster court. Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, D. (2015). Bias and previous determinations: Four recent cases in the court of appeal and privy council. Civil Justice Quarterly, 34, 138–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary. (2014). Everyone’s business: Improving the police response to domestic violence. London: HMIC.
   Google Scholar
• Hester, M. (2011). The three planet model: Towards an understanding of contradictions in approaches to women and children’s safety in the contexts of domestic violence. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 837–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hester, M., Pearce, P., & Westmarland, N. (2008). Early evaluation of the integrated domestic violence court, Croydon. London: Ministry of Justice,
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, R. (2014). Exploring the ‘LASPO Gap’. Family Law, 44, 660–663.
   Google Scholar
• MacDowell, E. (2011). When courts collide: Integrated domestic violence courts and court pluralism. Texas Journal of Women and the Law, 20(2), 97–130.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, A., & Aldrich, L. (2002). What makes a domestic violence court work? New York: Center for Court Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, V., & Shah, S. (2010). R v Dhaliwal Judgment. In R. Hunter, C. McGlynn, & E. Rackley (Eds.), Feminist judgments: From theory to practice (pp. 261–272). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• New Economics Foundation. (2014). Better courts: A snapshot of domestic violence courts in 2013. London: Centre for Justice Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Plotnikoff, J., & Woolfson, R. (2005). Review of the effectiveness of specialist courts in other jurisdictions. London: Department for Constitutional Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Rights of Women. (2013). Evidencing domestic violence: A barrier to family law legal aid. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. (2003). The Cardiff Women’s Safety Unit: A multi-agency approach to domestic violence. Cardiff: Cardiff University, School of Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A., & Payton, J. (2016). Independent advocacy and multi-agency responses to domestic violence. In S. Hilder & V. Bettinson (Eds.), Domestic violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives on protection, prevention and intervention (pp. 249–271). London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A., & Cook, D. (2006). Understanding victim retraction in cases of domestic violence: Specialist courts, government policy and victim-centred justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 9, 189–213.
   Google Scholar
• Standing Together. (2002). First soundings from a specialist domestic violence court. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Standing Together. (2003). Heard not judged: Consultation with survivors of domestic violence in the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham 2002-2003. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vallely, C., Robinson, A., Burton, M., & Tredigda, J. (2005). Evaluation of domestic violence pilot sites at Caerphilly (Gwent) and Croydon. London: Crown Prosecution Service.
   Google Scholar
• Women’s Aid. (2016). Nineteen child homicides. Bristol: Author.
   Google Scholar