A history of the use of the concept of parental alienation in the Australian family law system: contradictions, collisions and their consequences

References

• Altobelli, T., 2011. When a Child Rejects a Parent: why Children Resist Contact. Australian journal of family law, 25 (3), 185–209.
   Google Scholar
• Amato, P. and Gilbreth, J.G., 1999. Non-Resident Fathers and Children’s Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61 (3), 557–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC), 1995. For the Sake of the Kids: Complex Contact Cases and the Family Court. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Report Number 73.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC), 2010. Family Violence: A National Legal Response: Final Report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Report Number 114.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC), 2019. Family Law for the Future - An Inquiry into the Family Law System. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bagshaw, D., et al., 2010. Family violence and family law in australia: the experiences and views of children and adults from families who separated post-1995 and post 2006. Melbourne: Monash University.
   Google Scholar
• Bala, N., 2018. Parental Alienation: social Context and Legal Resources. In: Alienation? Myths, Complexities and Possibilities … 5th Annual AFCC Australian Chapter Conference August 2018, Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Berns, S.S., 2001. Parents Behaving Badly: parental Alienation Syndrome in the Family Court — magic Bullet or Poisoned Chalice. Australian journal of family law, 15 (3), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bravehearts Foundation, 2016. Abbey’s Project: A Bravehearts Paper on the Family Law System. Arundel, Qld: Bravehearts Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., et al., 1998. Violence in Families: Report No. 1: The Management of Abuse Allegations in Custody & Access Disputes Before the Family Court of Australia. Melbourne: Monash University.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, K., 1989. Brainwashing in Custody Cases: the Parental Alienation Syndrome. Australian Family Lawyer, 4 (3), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore, J., et al., 2010. Shared Care Parenting Arrangements Since the 2006 Family Law Reforms: report for Australian Government Attorney-General’s Department. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Chisholm, R., 2009. Family Courts Violence Review. Canberra: Attorney-General’s Department.
   Google Scholar
• Death, J., Ferguson, C., and Burgess, K., 2019. Parental alienation, coaching and the best interests of the child: allegations of child sexual abuse in the Family Court of Australia. Child abuse & neglect, 94, 104045–104054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar, J. and Parker, S., 1999. The Impact of the New Part VII Family Law Act 1975. Australian journal of family law, 13 (2), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, J., Maxwell, N., and Slater, T., 2020. Professional responses to ‘parental alienation’: research-informed practice. Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (1), 68–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elizabeth, V., 2020. The affective burden of separated mothers in PA(S) inflected custody law systems: A New Zealand case study. Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (1), 118–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elizabeth, V., Gavey, N., and Tolmie, J., 2010. Between a rock and a hard place: resident mothers and the moral dilemmas they face during custody disputes. Feminist Legal Studies, 18 (3), 253–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Family Law Council, 2009. Improving responses to family violence in the family law system: an advice on the intersection of family violence and family law issues. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M., 1991. The illusion of equality: the rhetoric and reality of divorce reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R.A., 1985. Recent trends in divorce and custody litigation. Academy Forum, 29 (2), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Graycar, R., 2012. Family law reform in australia, or frozen chooks revisited again? Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 13 (1), 241–269.
   Google Scholar
• Hawthorne, R. and Lennings, C., 2008. The Marginalization of Non-Resident Fathers: their Postdivorce Roles. Journal of divorce & remarriage, 49 (3), 191–209.
   Google Scholar
• House of Representatives, 2003. Every Picture Tells a Story: Report on the Inquiry into Child Custody Arrangements in the Event of Family Separation. Canberra: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• House of Representatives, 2004-2005. Explanatory Memorandum Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Bill 2005. Canberra: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• House of Representatives, 2005. Report on the exposure draft of the Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Bill 2005. Canberra: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• House of Representatives, 2010-2011. Explanatory Memorandum Family Law Legislation Amendment (Family Violence and Other Measures) Bill 2011. Canberra: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• House of Representatives, 2017. A better family law system to support and protect those affected by family violence: recommendations for an accessible, equitable and responsive family law system which better prioritises safety of those affected by family violence. Canberra: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., 2004. Children of divorce who reject a parent and refuse visitation: recent research and social policy implications for the alienated child. In: 11th National Family Law Conference, Broadbeach, Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Kaspiew, R., 2005. Violence in contested children’s cases: an empirical exploration. Australian journal of family law, 19 (2), 112–143.
   Google Scholar
• Kaspiew, R., et al., 2009. Evaluation of the 2006 family law reforms. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, M. and Tolmie, J., 1998. Fathers’ rights groups in australia and their engagement with issues in family law. Australian journal of family law, 12 (1), 19–69.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, L., 2010. No way to live: women’s experiences of negotiating the family law system in the context of domestic violence. Sydney, N.S.W.: New South Wales Health, University of Sydney and Benevolent Society.
   Google Scholar
• Lapierre, S., et al., 2020. The legitimization and institutionalization of ‘parental alienation’ in the Province of Quebec. Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (1), 30–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, K., 1993. Continuing barriers to women’s credibility: a feminist perspective on the proof process. Criminal law forum, 4 (2), 327–353.
   Google Scholar
• McGhee, A., 2015. Darcey Freeman inquest: doctors knew father who threw 4yo off Melbourne’s West Gate Bridge was violent, court hears. ABC News Online. Available from: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-07-15/doctors-knew-freeman-was-violent-before-bridge-murder/6620082. [Accessed 22 November 2019].
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, J., et al., 2010. Post-separation parenting arrangements and developmental outcomes for infants and children - collected reports. North Carlton, Victoria: Family Transitions.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, J.S., 2009. A historical perspective on parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation. Journal of Child Custody, 6 (3), 232–257.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, J.S., 2020. U.S. child custody outcomes in cases involving parental alienation and abuse allegations: what do the data show? Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (1), 92–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaleo, V., 2013. When Children Refuse Contact with a Parent - The Language of Conflict and the Reciprocal Relationship Between the Court and The Social Sciences. In: 6th world congress on family law and children’s rights May 2013, Sydney, N.S.W.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Domestic Violence Task Force, 1988. Beyond These Walls: Report of the Queensland Domestic Violence Task Force to the Honourable Peter McKechnie, M.L.A., Minister for Family Services and Welfare Housing. Brisbane: Department of Family Services.
   Google Scholar
• Rathus, Z., 2013. Shifting language and meanings between social science and the law: defining family violence. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 36 (2), 359–389.
   Google Scholar
• Rathus, Z., 2016. Mapping the use of social science in Australian courts: the example of family law children’s cases. Griffith Law Review, 25 (3), 352–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathus, Z., 2018. ‘The research says … ‘: perceptions on the use of social science research in the family law system. Federal law review, 46 (1), 85–111.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades, H., 2002. The no contact mother. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 16 (1), 71–94.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades, H., Graycar, R., and Harrison, M., 2000. The family law reform act 1995: the first three years. Sydney, N.S.W.: University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, L. and Broadhurst, K., 2019. Introducing social science evidence in family court decision-making and adjudication: evidence from England and Wales. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 33 (2), 181–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scutt, J.A., 1983. Even in the Best of Homes: violence in the Family. Ringwood, Victoria: Pelican Books.
   Google Scholar
• Strickland, S. and Murray, K., 2014. A Judicial perspective on the australian family violence reforms 12 months on. Australian journal of family law, 28 (1), 47–82.
   Google Scholar
• Warshak, R., 2015. Parental alienation: overview, management, intervention, and practice tips. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 28 (1), 181–248.
   Google Scholar