The role of lawyers in supporting young people in the criminal justice system: balancing economic survival and children’s rights

References

• Arthur, R., 2019. Regulating youth sexuality, agency and citizenship: developing a coherent criminal justice response to youth sexting. King’s law journal, 30 (3), 377–395. doi:10.1080/09615768.2019.1686229
   Google Scholar
• Binder, A., et al., 2004. Lawyers as counsellors: a client‐centred approach. St. Paul, MN: West.
   Google Scholar
• Botley, M., Jinks, B., and Metson, C., 2010. Young people’s views and experiences of the youth justice system. London: Children’s Workforce Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, K., Freer, J., and Furlong, C., 2007. Language and communication difficulties in juvenile offenders. International journal of language and communication disorders, 42 (5), 505. doi:10.1080/13682820601053977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cape, E., 2006. Defending suspects at police stations. 5th ed. London: Legal Action Group.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, N., 2019. The albatross of Juvenile criminal records. In: S. Meijer, H. Annison, and A. O’Loughlin, eds. Fundamental rights and legal consequences of criminal. Oxford: Hart, 249–262.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, N., Dwyer, C., and Larrauri, E., 2015. Young people, criminal records and employment barriers. Belfast: NIACRO.
   Google Scholar
• Cleghorn, N., Kinsella, R., McNaughton Nicholls, C. 2011. Engaging with the views of young people with experience of the youth justice system. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J., Hendry, L., and Kloep, M., 2011. Adolescence and health. New Jersey: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, 2009. The bradley report. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Deuchar, R. and Sapouna, M., 2015. ‘Its harder to go to court yourself because you don’t really know what to expect’: reducing the negative effects of court exposure on young people – findings from an evaluation in Scotland’. Youth justice, 15 (1), 13.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, C. and Brank, E.M., 2009. Juveniles’ knowledge of the court process: results from instruction from an electronic source. Behavioural sciences & the law, 27 (4), 627. doi:10.1002/bsl.881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felstiner, W., 2001. Synthesising socio‐legal research: lawyer‐client relations as an example. International journal of the legal profession, 8 (3), 191–201. doi:10.1080/09695950220141016
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P. and Ratcliffe, R., 2019. Criminal defence in an age of austerity: zealous advocate or cog in a machine? London: Transform Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Goldson, B. and Muncie, J., 2012. Towards a global ‘child friendly’ juvenile justice. International journal of law, crime and justice, 40 (1), 47–64. doi:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2011.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazel, N., Hagell, A., and Brazier, L., 2002. Young offenders’ perceptions of their experiences in the criminal justice system. London: Policy Research Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government, 2019. Standard crime contract specification: version 5. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Home at Law and the Children’s Law Centre, 2006. My voice, my life, my future. Philadelphia: Pew Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M., et al., 2010. Procedural justice, trust, and institutional legitimacy. Policing: a journal of policy and practice, 4 (3), 203. doi:10.1093/police/paq027
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, N., et al., 2012. Nobody made the connection: the prevalence of Neurodisabillity in young people who offend. London: Office of the Children’s Commissioner.
   Google Scholar
• Inns of Court College of Advocacy (ICCA), 2019. General guidance for first hearings in the youth court. London: ICCA.
   Google Scholar
• Judicial College, 2016. Youth court bench book. London: Sentencing Council.
   Google Scholar
• Justice Committee, 2016. The treatment of young adults in the criminal justice system. London: House of Commons Justice Committee HC 109.
   Google Scholar
• Justice Committee, 2018. Criminal legal aid. London: House of Commons Justice Committee HC 1069.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A.E., 2000. Adolescent development, mental disorders and decision making of delinquent youths. In: T. Grisso and R.G. Shwartz, eds.. Youth on trial: a developmental perspective on juvenile justice. Chicago University Press. pp. 33–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, V., 2010. Transforming legal aid: access to criminal defence services. London: Legal Services Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, V., 2013. “No time for a Solicitor”: implications for delays on the take up of legal advice. Criminal law review, 3, 184–202.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, V., Pleasance, P., and Balmer, N., 2011. Children, young people and requests for police station legal advice: 25 years on from PACE. Youth justice, 11 (1), 28–46. doi:10.1177/1473225410394288
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M.E. and Sim, M.P.Y., 2013. Developmental factors affecting children in legal contexts. Youth justice, 13 (2), 131–144. doi:10.1177/1473225413492055
   Google Scholar
• Liefaard, T., 2016. Child-friendly justice: protection and participation of children in the justice system. Temple law review, 88, 905–927.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R., 2013. Power, not pity’: poverty and human rights. Ethics and social welfare, 7 (2), 109–123. doi:10.1080/17496535.2013.779002
   Google Scholar
• Loucks, N., 2007. No one knows: offenders with learning difficulties and learning disabilities: the prevalence and associated needs of offenders with learning difficulties and learning disabilities. London: Prison Reform Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Mantouvalou, V., 2020. Welfare to work, structural injustice and human rights. Modern law review, 83 (5), 929–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, L., 2016. Leveson’s narrow pursuit of justice. Common law world review, 45 (1), 51–67. doi:10.1177/1473779515625386
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2016. Review of the youth justice system in England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice Cm 9298.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2017. Litigators’ graduated fees scheme, final stage impact assessment. London: Ministry of Justice. IA No: MoJ013/2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2019a. Legal aid statistics quarterly: October to December 2018. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Mungham, G. and Thomas, P., 1979. Advocacy and the solicitor‐advocate in magistrates’ courts in England and Wales. International journal of the sociology of law, 7 (2), 169–196.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D., 2012. Still standing accused: addressing the gap between work and talk in firms of criminal defence lawyers. International journal of the legal profession, 19 (1), 3–27. doi:10.1080/09695958.2012.758039
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. and Welsh, L., 2019. The practices of modern criminal defence lawyers: alienation and its implications for access to justice. Common law world review, 48 (1–2), 64–89. doi:10.1177/1473779519848348
   Google Scholar
• Otterburn Legal Consulting, 2014. Transforming legal aid: next steps, a report for the law society of england and wales and the ministry of justice. London: Otterburn Legal Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Parekh, S., 2011. Getting to the root of gender inequality: structural injustice and political responsibility. Hypatia, 26 (4), 672–689. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01159.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, M. and Faden, R., 2019. Structural injustice: power, advantage and human rights. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2006. Child defendants. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists. Occasional paper OP56.
   Google Scholar
• Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N., 2019. Incarcerated childhood and the politics of unchilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinns, L., 2009. Let’s get it over with: early findings on the factors affecting detainees access to custodial legal advice. Policing and society, 19 (1), 58–74. doi:10.1080/10439460802457693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T., 2013. Trust, choice and money: why the aid reform ‘u-turn’ is essential for effective criminal defence. Criminal law review, 11, 906–913.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. and Cape, E., 2017. The rise and decline of criminal legal aid in England and Wales. In: A. Flynn and J. Hodgson, eds.. Access to justice and legal aid: comparative perspectives on unmet legal need. Oxford: Hart. pp. 63–86.
   Google Scholar
• Solicitors Regulation Authority, 2020. Assuring advocacy standards. Consultation response. London: SRA.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerlad, H., 2001. “I’ve lost the plot”: an everyday story of legal aid lawyers. Journal of law and society, 28 (3), 335. doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommerlad, H. and Wall, D., 2000. Legally aided clients and their solicitors: qualitative perspectives on quality and legal aid. London: Law Society Research Paper No 34.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, B. and Bird, S., 2010. Police station adviser’s index. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, H., Garcia, I.G., and Mathews, Z., 1997. Post traumatic stress disorder in incarcerated juvenile delinquents. Journal of the American academy of child psychology and psychiatry, 36 (3), 357. doi:10.1097/00004583-199703000-00014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, N., 2010. Old heads upon young shoulders: ‘compassion to human infirmity following R v. JTB. Journal of social welfare & family law, 32 (3), 287, 292. doi:10.1080/09649069.2010.520521
   Google Scholar
• Taddia, M., 25 November 2019. Off home turf. The Law Society Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, 2009. General comment No. 12: the right of the child to be heard CRC/C/GC/12. Geneva: UNCRC.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, 2016. Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Geneva: UNCRC.
   Google Scholar
• Vandekerckhove, A. and O’Brien, K., 2013. Child-friendly justice: turning law into reality. ERA forum, 14 (4), 523–541. doi:10.1007/s12027-013-0323-y
   Google Scholar
• Vandenhole, W., 2014. Child poverty and children’s rights: an uneasy fit? Michigan state international law review, 22, 609–636.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L., 2008. Ordering insecurity: social polarization and the punitive upsurge. Radical philosophy review, 11 (1), 9–27. doi:10.5840/radphilrev20081112
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, L., 2017. The effects of changes to legal aid on Lawyers’ professional identity and behaviour in summary criminal cases: a case study. Journal of law and society, 44 (4), 559–585. doi:10.1111/jols.12058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigzell, A., Kirby, A., and Jacobson, J., 2015. The youth proceedings advocacy review: final report. London: Bar Standards Board.
   Google Scholar