Using the justice system as a ‘magic wand:’ lessons from victims of domestic violence in Buenos Aires (Argentina)

References

• Barendrecht, M., 2010. Legal aid, accessible courts or legal information? Three access to justice strategies compared. TISCO Working Paper Series on Civil Law and Conflict Resolution Systems No. 010/2010. Available from http://ssrn.com/paper=1706825 01 June 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Barendrecht, M., Kamminga, P., and Verdonschot, J.H., 2008. Priorities for the justice system: responding to the most urgent legal problems of individuals. SSRN ELibrary. Available from http://ssrn.com/paper=1090885 01 June 2020
   Google Scholar
• Barendrecht, M., Mulder, J., and Giesen, I., 2006. How to measure the price and quality of access to justice? SSRN ELibrary. Available from http://ssrn.com/paper=949209 01 June 2020
   Google Scholar
• Bedner, A.W. and Vel, J.A.C., 2010. An analytical framework for empirical research on access to justice. Law, Social Justice & Global Development (LGD), 15 (1), 29.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, J.W., et al., 2007. Legal empowerment of the poor: from concepts to assessment. U.S. Agency for International Development.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelletti, M., and Garth, B., 1978. Access to justice Vol. I: a world survey (Book I & II). European University Institute: Giuffrè Editore/Sijthoff/Noordhoff. Available from http://cadmus.eui.eu//handle/1814/18559 15 April 2018
   Google Scholar
• Cappelletti, M., Gordley, J., and Johnson, E., Jr., 1975. Toward equal justice: a comparative study of legal aid in modern societies. Milan: Giuffre & Oceana Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, N., 2010. Victim movements at a crossroad. Punishment & society, 12 (2), 115–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474509357978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor, 8AD. Making the Law Work for Everyone. Vol I. Report of the Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor. New York: Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor and United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Contravention Code, 2004. Código Contravencional de La Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. http://www.buenosaires.gob.ar/areas/seguridad_justicia/justicia_trabajo/contravencional/completo.php
   Google Scholar
• Convención Constituyente, 1996. Constitución de La Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Available from http://www.legislatura.gov.ar/documentos/constituciones/constitucion-ciudad.pdf 01 June 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Criminal Code, 1984 Código Penal de La Nación . . http://www.infoleg.gov.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/15000-19999/16546/texact.htm. Congreso de la Nación Argentina
   Google Scholar
• Currie, A., 2006. A national survey of the civil justice problems of low-and moderate-income Canadians: incidence and patterns. International journal of the legal profession, 13 (3), 217–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09695950701192194
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, S., and UNDP, 2007. Gender equality and justice programming: equitable. Access to justice for women. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Drost, L., et al., 2013. Restorative justice in cases of domestic violence. WS1. Comparative Report. Criminal Justice 2013 with the financial support of the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J., 1992. Empowerment: the politics of an alternative development. Economic Geography: Blackwell Cambridge MA & Oxford UK.
   Google Scholar
• Genn, H., 1999. Paths to justice: what people do and think about going to law. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Genn, H., 2009. Hazel genn and paths to justice. In: Conducting law and society research, reflections on methods and practices. Cambridge Studies in Law and Society: Cambridge University Press, 227–239.
   Google Scholar
• Golub, S., 2010. What is legal empowerment? An introduction. In: Legal empowerment: working papers Golub, S. Rome, Italy: International Development Law Organisation, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Golub, S, 2003. Beyond rule of law Orthodoxy: the legal empowerment alternative. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available from http://carnegieendowment.org/2003/10/14/beyond-rule-of-law-orthodoxy-legal-empowerment-alternative/bet [Accessed 6 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, R.G, n.d. Research methods in the social sciences with a particular focus on qualitative research. YouTube. Available from http://www.youtube.com/user/GrahamRGibbs?feature=&view=. [Accessed 22 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Gramatikov, M. and Porter, R.B., 2010. Yes, I Can: subjective legal empowerment. Tilburg University, TISCO Working Paper Series on Civil Law and Conflict Resolution Systems No. 010/2010, October, p. 46.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S.N., and Leavy, P., 2010. The practice of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Keohane, R.O., and Verba, S., 1994. Designing social inquiry. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, R.A., 2010. Access to civil justice. In: The oxford handbook of empirical legal research Cane , Peter, and Kritzer, Hebert. Oxford University Press, 492–521.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, Gabrielle M., Smith, Catherine, Shepherd, Paula J. & Morris, Alison (1999) Meeting Legal Service Needs (Wellington, New Zealand Legal Services Board).
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, A.N., 1992. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, D.K., 2008. Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pleasence, P., et al., 2004. Causes of action: civil law and social justice. Final Report First Edition. First LSRC Survey of Justiciable Problems. Legal Services Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ptacek, J., ed., 2009. Restorative justice and violence against women. Oxford Scholarship Online 15 May 2017 doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335484.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Research, and Public, Legal Needs and Civil Justice: A Survey of Americans: Major Findings of the Comprehensive Legal Needs Study, 1994 https://www.wisbar.org/aboutus/membership/Documents/WisTAFApp_J_ABA_Legal_need_study.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H.J., and Rubin, I.S., 2012. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. SAGE Publications doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226651.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P.D., 1958. Juvenile courts: the Juvenile’s point of view. British journal of delinquency, 9, 200.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland, J., Robinson, G., and Sorsby, A., 2011. Restorative justice in practice: evaluating what works for victims and offenders. New York, NY: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L.W., 2000. Domestic violence and restorative justice: answering key questions. Virginia journal of social policy & the law, 8, 263.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, H., and Braithwaite, J., 2002. Restorative justice and family violence. United Kingdon: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UN Secretary General, 2002. Justicia Restaurativa. E /CN.15/2002/5/Add.1. 11° Período de Sesiones. Available from https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/commissions/11comm/5add1s.pdf 01 June 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Van De Meene, I., and Van Rooij, B., 2008. Access to Justice and Legal Empowerment. Making the Poor Central in Legal Development Co-Operation. Leiden University Press. Available from http://books.google.nl/books?id=U_U84FKFBBQC 01 June 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J., et al., 2007. The family advice and information service: a changing role for family lawyers in England and Wales? Final evaluation report. Final Evaluation Report. Newcastle Centre for Family Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Webley, L., 2010. Qualitative approaches to empirical legal research. In: The oxford handbook of empirical legal research Cane, Peter, and Kritzer, Herbert M. Oxford University Press, 926–950 doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542475.013.0039.
   Google Scholar
• Wojkowska, E., and UNDP, 2006 Doing justice: how informal justice systems can contribute .Oslo Governance Centre: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H.F., 2008. Writing up qualitative research. 3rd ed. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• XIV Ibero-American Judicial Summit, 2008. Brasilia regulations regarding access to justice for vulnerable people. Available from https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Brasilia-rules-vulnerable-groups.pdf 01 June 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Paths to Justice in the Netherlands
   Google Scholar