1,693
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Processes and determining factors when family court judgments are made in England about infants entering care at birth

References

  • Broadhurst, K., et al., 2018. Born into care: newborn babies subject to care proceedings in England. London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory.
  • Broadhurst, K., Alrouh, B., Mason, C., Ward, H., Holmes, L., Ryan, M., and Bowyer, S., 2018. Born into Care: newborn babies subject to care proceedings in England. London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory.
  • Burns, K., et al., 2019. The hidden proceedings – an analysis of accountability of child protection adoption proceedings in eight European jurisdictions. European journal of comparative law and governance, 6 (4), 339–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00604002
  • Doughty, J., 2015. Where nothing else will do: judicial approaches to adoption in England and Wales. Adoption and fostering, 39 (2), 105–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308575915586298
  • Doughty, J., Reed, L., and Magrath, P., 2018. Transparency in the family courts: publicity and privacy in practice. Bloomsbury Family Law Series. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Doughty, J., Twaite, A., and Magrath, P., 2017. Transparency through publication of family court judgments: an evaluation of the responses to, and effects of, judicial guidance on publishing family court judgments involving children and young people. London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory.
  • Family Rights Group, 2018. Care crisis review: options for change. London: FRG.
  • Featherstone, B. and Gupta, A., 2018. The role of the social worker in adoption- ethics and human rights. Birmingham: BASW.
  • Hale, L.B., 2018. Openness and privacy in family proceedings: Sir Nicholas wall memorial lecture. London: Ministry of Justice.
  • Krutzinna, J. and Skivenes, M., 2021. Judging parental competence: a cross-country analysis of judicial decision makers’ written assessment of mothers’ parenting capacities in newborn removal cases. Child and family social work, 26 (1), 50–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12788
  • Luhamaa, K., et al., 2021. Services and support for mothers and newborn babies in vulnerable situations: a study of eight European jurisdictions. Children and youth services review, 120, 105762. Open Access. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105762
  • McFarlane, L.A., 2019. A view from the president’s chambers, May 2019. London: MoJ.
  • Monk, D. and McVarish, J., 2018. Siblings, contact and the law: an overlooked relationship. London: Nuffield Foundation.
  • Munby, S.J., 2013. A view from the President’s chambers: the process of reform. London: Office of the President of the Family Division.
  • Munby, S.J., 16 Jan 2014. Transparency in the family courts: publication of judgments practice guidance, [2014] 1 WLR 230; [2014] 1 FLR 733, Fam D. Available from: https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications/transparency-in-the-family-courts/14 [Accessed 08 Apr 2021].
  • Munby, S.J., et al., 2021. Proposal for the law commission’s 14th programme of law reform. Available from: http://www.transparencyproject.org.uk/proposal-to-the-law-commission-for-transparency-reform/ [Accessed 5 Mar 2021].
  • Neil, E., Gitsels, L., and Thoburn, J., 2019. Children in care: where do children entering care at different ages end up? An analysis of local authority administrative data. Children and youth services review, 106, 104472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104472
  • Public Law Working Group, 2021. Recommendations to achieve best practice in the child protection and family justice systems. London: Office of the President of the Family Division.
  • Thoburn, J. and Featherstone, B., 2018. Adoption, child rescue, maltreatment and poverty. In: S.A. Webb, ed. The Routledge handbook of critical social work. London: Routledge, 401–411.
  • Tickle, L., 2021. Consultation response to the President of the family division’s review into transparency in the family justice system. London: The Open Family Court. Available from: https://openfamilycourt.wordpress.com/2020/05/11/241/ [Accessed 7 Mar 2021].
  • Transparency Project, 2021. The President of the family division’s transparency review: response of the transparency project to the call for evidence. London: The Transparency Project. Available from: http://www.transparencyproject.org.uk/press/wp-content/uploads/transparency-consultation-response-29-April-2020.pdf [Accessed 07 Mar 2021].