Parliamentary scrutiny of the Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman

References

• Adler, M., 2003. A socio-legal approach to administrative justice. Law & Policy, 25 (4), 323–352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0265-8240.2003.00153.x.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, B., 2007. The impact of external administrative law review: courts, tribunals and ombudsman. Australian Institute of Administrative Law National Conference, 14–15 June 2007, Canberra, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Behrens, R., 2015. Public trust and the ombudsman: the case of the OIA. Office of Independent Adjudicator: Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office, 2015. A public services ombudsman: government response to consultation. (December 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office, 2016. Draft public services ombudsman bill. Cm 9374.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe, 2019. Principles on the protection and promotion of the ombudsman institution. CDL-AD(2019)005-e.
   Google Scholar
• Creutzfeldt, N., 2018. Ombudsmen and ADR. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Creutzfeldt, N. and Kirkham, R., 2020. Understanding how and when change occurs in the administrative justice system: the ombudsman/ tribunal partnership as a catalyst for reform? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 42 (2), 253–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2020.1751931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorsett, S., 2014. How do things get started? Legal transplants and domestication: an example from colonial New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, 12 (1), 103.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A., 1982. Risk and culture: an Essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilad, S., 2008. Accountability or expectations management? The role of the ombudsman in financial regulation. Law & Policy, 30, 227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2008.00275.x
   Google Scholar
• Gill, C., Mullen, T., and Vivian, N., 2020. The managerial ombudsman. The Modern Law Review, 83 (4), 797–830. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziadei, M., 2009. Legal transplants and the frontiers of legal knowledge. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 10 (2), 723–743. doi:https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1231.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, S. and Scott, C., 2010. A cultural analysis of administrative justice. In, and M. Adler, ed. Administrative justice in context. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 178–194.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A.O., 1970. Exit, voice and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., 1998. the art of the state: culture, rhetoric and public management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkham, R., 2004. When is it appropriate to use an Ombudsman. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 26 (2), 181–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/014180304200023105.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkham, R., 2021. The ombudsman, accountability and the courts. London: Nuffield Foundation. Available from: www.sheffield.ac.uk/law/research/centres-and-institutes/procedural-fairness-accountability-and-ombudsman [ Accessed 11 January 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Kirkham, R. and Gill, C., 2020. A manifesto for ombudsman reform. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, N., 2018. Ombudsman and public authorities: a modest proposal. In: M. Hertogh, and R. Kirkham, eds. Research Handbook on the Ombudsman. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 34–52.
   Google Scholar
• PACAC (Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee), 2021a. Parliamentary and health service ombudsman scrutiny 2019–20. HC 843 (2019–21).
   Google Scholar
• PACAC, 2021b. Oral evidence: parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Scrutiny. HC 721 (2020–21), Tuesday 14 December 2021.
   Google Scholar
• PACAC, 2021c. Home page of the public administration and constitutional affairs committee. Available from: https://committees.parliament.uk/work/1503/parliamentary-and-health-service-ombudsman-scrutiny-202021/publications/written-evidence/?page=1 [ Accessed 11 January 2022].
   Google Scholar
• PACAC, 2021d. Written evidence from actions against medical accidents. October. Available from: https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/40446/pdf/ [Accessed 11 January 2022].
   Google Scholar
• PACAC, 2021e. Letter from Rob Behrens (Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman) to public administration and constitutional affairs committee. 12 November. Available from: https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/7918/documents/82026/default/ [Accessed 11 January 2022].
   Google Scholar
• PASC (Public Administration Select Committee), 2014. More complaints please! HC 947 (2013–14)
   Google Scholar
• Patients Association, 2014. Parliamentary and health service ombudsman the ‘peoples’ ombudsman – how it failed us. London: Patients’ Association. Available from: https://minhalexander.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/phso-the-peoples-ombudsman-how-it-failed-us-final4.pdf [ Accessed 11 January 2022].
   Google Scholar
• PHSO, 2018b. Our strategy 2018–21. London: PHSO. Available from: https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/sites/default/files/page/Our%20strategy%202018-2021.pdf [ Accessed 12 January 2022].
   Google Scholar
• PHSO, 2020. Continuing healthcare: getting it right first time. HC 872 (2019–21).
   Google Scholar
• PHSO, 2021a. NHS complaint standards: summary of expectations. London: PHSO. Availavle from: https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/sites/default/files/NHS_Complaint_Standards_Summary_of_expectations_Spring_2021_A.pdf [ Accessed 12 January 2022].
   Google Scholar
• PHSO, 2021b. Unlocking solutions in imaging: working together to learn from failings in the NHS. HC 393 (2021–22).
   Google Scholar
• PHSO, 2021c. Annual report. HC 401 (2021–22).
   Google Scholar
• PHSO (Parliament and Health Services Ombudsman), 2018a. Clinical advice review: final report and our response. London: PHSO. Available from: https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/clinical-advice-review [ Accessed 12 January 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Prisons and Probation Ombudsman, 2021. Terms of reference. London: Ministry of Justice. Available at: https://www.ppo.gov.uk/about/vision-and-values/terms-of-reference/ [ Accessed 11 January 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Rowat, D., ed., 1965. The ombudsman: citizen’s defender. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Select Committee on Communities and Local Government, 2012. The work of the local government ombudsman. HC 431 (incorporating HC 1937) (2010–12).
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, R., Birchall, J., and Prout, A., 2007. Hearing voices: user involvement in public services. Consumer Policy Review, 17, 234.
   Google Scholar
• Stuhmcke, A., 2012. The evolution of the classical ombudsman: a view from the antipodes. International Journal of Public Law and Policy, 2 (1), 83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPLAP.2012.045224.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, M., Ellis, R., and Wildavsky, A., 1990. Cultural theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twining, W., 2004. Diffusion of law: a global perspective. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 36 (49), 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2004.10756300.
   Google Scholar
• Vitale, D., 2018. A trust network model for social rights fulfilment. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 38 (4), 706–732. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqy026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar