597
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Dislocated lives: the experience of women survivors of family and domestic violence after being ‘Hagued’

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

Journal Articles

  • Bozin, D., 2012. Re-examining habitual residence as the sole connecting factor in Hague Convention child abduction cases. Family law review, 3 (1), 3–14.
  • Bruch, C.S., 2004. The unmet needs of domestic violence victims and their children in Hague child abduction convention cases. Family law quarterly, 38 (3), 529–545.
  • Douglas, H. and Burdon, M., 2018. Legal responses to non-consensual smartphone recordings in the context of domestic and family violence. University of new south wales law journal, 41 (1), 157–184. doi:10.53637/RMSL3175
  • Elizabeth, V., 2017. Custody Stalking: a mechanism of coercively controlling mothers following separation. Feminist legal studies, 25 (2), 185–201. doi:10.1007/s10691-017-9349-9
  • Fields, S.E., 2020. Sexual violence and future harm: lessons from asylum law. Utah law review, 2020 (1), 177–245.
  • Francia, L., Millear, P., and Sharman, R., 2020. Mothering – a mode of protecting rather than parenting in the aftermath of post separation family violence in Australia. Children Australia, 45 (2), 109–116. doi:10.1017/cha.2020.24
  • Freeman, M. and Taylor, N., 2020. Domestic violence and child participation: contemporary challenges for the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention. Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (2), 154–175. doi:10.1080/09649069.2020.1751938
  • Hale, B., 2017. Taking flight—Domestic violence and child abduction. Current legal problems, 70 (1), 3–16. doi:10.1093/clp/cux001
  • Harris, B.A. and Woodlock, D., 2019. Digital coercive control: insights from two landmark domestic violence studies. The british journal of criminology, 59 (3), 530–550. doi:10.1093/bjc/azy052
  • Humphreys, C. and Thiara, R.K., 2003. Neither justice nor protection: women’s experiences of post-separation violence. Journal of social welfare and family law, 25 (3), 195–214. doi:10.1080/0964906032000145948
  • Jeffries, S., et al., 2016. Good evidence, safe outcomes in parenting matters involving domestic violence?: understanding family report writing practice from the perspective of professionals working in the family law system. University of new south wales law journal, 39 (4), 1355–1388.
  • Katz, E., Nikupeteri, A., and Laitinen, M., 2020. When coercive control continues to harm children: post-separation fathering, stalking and domestic violence. Child abuse review, 29 (4), 310–324. doi:10.1002/car.2611
  • Kaye, M., 1999. The Hague Convention and the flight from domestic violence: how women and children are being returned by coach and four. International journal of law, policy and the family, 13 (2), 191–212. doi:10.1093/lawfam/13.2.191
  • Laing, L., 2017. Secondary victimization: domestic violence survivors navigating the family law system. Violence against women, 23 (11), 1314–1335. doi:10.1177/2F1077801216659942
  • Maxwell, A., 2017. The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980: the New Zealand courts’ approach to the grave risk exception for victims of domestic violence. Victoria university of wellington law review, 48 (1), 81–106. doi:10.26686/vuwlr.v48i1.4768
  • Miller, S.L. and Smolter, N.L., 2011. Paper abuse: when all else fails, batterers use procedural stalking. Violence against women, 17 (5), 637–650. doi:10.1177/1077801211407290
  • Momoh, O., 2019. The interpretation and application of Article 13(1)(b) of The Hague Child Abduction Convention in cases involving domestic violence: revisiting X v Latvia and the principle of “effective examination”. Journal of private international law, 15 (3), 626–657. doi:10.1080/17441048.2019.1684665
  • Moses, L.B., et al., 2022. Technology-Facilitated Domestic and Family Violence: protecting the Privacy and Safety of Victim-Survivors. Law, technology and human, 4 (1). doi:10.5204/lthj.2160
  • Quillen, B., 2014. The new face of international child abduction: domestic violence victims and their treatment under The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Texas international law journal, 49 (3), 621–643.
  • Saladino, R. and Christie, S., 2020. Family law: the limits of the ‘Hague Convention’ in child abduction cases. LSJ, 67, 84–85.
  • Salter, M., 2014. Getting Hagued: the impact of international law on child abduction by protective mothers. Alternative law journal, 39 (1), 19–23. doi:10.1177/1037969X1403900106
  • Sheehy, E. and Boyd, S.B., 2020. Penalizing women’s fear: intimate partner violence and parental alienation in Canadian child custody cases. Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (1), 80–91. doi:10.1080/09649069.2020.1701940
  • Silberman, L., 2011. The Hague Convention on Child Abduction and unilateral relocations by custodial parents: a perspective from the United States and Europe. Oklahoma Law Review, 63 (4), 733–750.
  • Smyth, B. and Moloney, L., 2008. Changes in patterns of post-separation parenting over time: a brief review. Journal of family studies, 14 (1), 7–22. doi:10.5172/jfs.327.14.1.7
  • Trimmings, K. and Momoh, O., 2021. Intersection between domestic violence and international parental child abduction: protection of abducting mothers in return proceedings. International journal of law, policy and the family, 35 (1), ebab001. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebab020
  • Vesneski, W., Lindhorst, T., and Edleson, J.L., 2011. US judicial implementation of The Hague Convention in cases alleging domestic violence. Juvenile and family court journal, 62 (2), 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1755-6988.2011.01058.x
  • Weiner, M.H., 2002. Navigating the road between uniformity and progress: the need for purposive analysis of The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Columbia human rights law review, 33 (2), 275–362.
  • Yamaguchi, S. and Lindhorst, T., 2016. Domestic violence and the implementation of the hague convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction: Japan and U.S. Policy. Journal of international women’s studies, 17 (4), 16–30.
  • Zeoli, A.M., et al., 2013. Post-separation abuse of women and their children: boundary-setting and family court utilization among victimized mothers. Journal of Family Violence, 28 (6), 6, 547–560. doi:10.1007/s10896-013-9528-7

Books

  • Harris Rimmer, S., and Ogg, K., ed., 2019. Research Handbook on Feminist Engagement with International Law. Edward Elgar.
  • Jaffe, P.G., Lemon, Nancy K.D., and Poisson, Samantha E., 2003. Child Custody and Domestic Violence: A Call for Safety and Accountability. Sage.
  • Lavie, S., 2018. Wrapped in the Flag of Israel: Mizrahi Single Mothers and Bureaucratic Torture, Lincoln. University of Nebraska Press (revised ed).
  • Liamputtong, P., and Ezzy, D., 2005. Qualitative Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
  • Lindhorst, T., Edleson, J. L., 2012. Battered Women, Their Children, and International Law: The Unintended Consequences of the Hague Child Abduction Convention. North Eastern University Press.
  • Schuz, R., 2013. The Hague Child Abduction Convention: A Critical Analysis. Hart Publishing.

Reports

Websites

Acts of Parliament

Conventions

  • Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child.
  • Abduction, opened for signature 25 October 1980, T.I.A.S. 11,670, 1343 U.N.T.S. 89 (entered into force 1 December 1983).
  • Hague Explanatory Report on the 1980 HCCH Child Abduction Convention, Elisa Perez-Vera (April 1981).
  • Hague Convention of 19 October 1996 on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children 2204 UNTS 95 (entered into force 1 January 2002).

Law Reports

  • Director-General, Department of Community Services & Timms (aka Black), 2008. FamCAFC 132.
  • DP v Commonwealth Central Authority; JLM v Director-General, NSW Department of Community Services, 2001. HCA 39.
  • Walpole & Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice, 2020 FamCAFC 65.
  • LRR v COL, 2020. NZCA 209.
  • Re C (abduction) (grave risk of psychological harm), 1999. 2 FCR 507.
  • In Re H (and others) Minors, 1997. UKHL 12.
  • Acosta v Acosta (Civil No. 12-342 (D. Minn. filed 14 June 2012).
  • Re Application of Adan, 437 F.3d 381 (3d Cir. 2006).
  • Elyashiv v Elyashiv 353 F.Supp.2D 394 (E.D.N.Y 2005).
  • Gomez v Fuenmayor (812 F.3d 1005 (11th Cir. 2016).
  • Olhin v Del Carmen Cruz Santana 2005 U.S. Dist. Lexis 408 (E.D.N.Y. 2005).
  • Tsarbopoulos v Tsarbopoulos 176 F.Supp.2d 1045 (E.D. Wash. 2001).
  • Van de Sande v Van de Sande 431 F.3d 567 (7th Cir – 7 December 2005).
  • Walsh v Walsh 221 F 3d 204 (1 Cir 2000).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.