References
- Anthonioz, L., 23 May 2023. La filiation des enfants nés d´une GPA à l´étranger: Arrêt du TF 5A_545/2020 du 7 février 2022. Jusletter [ online], 1–21. ( jusletter.ch).
- Baars, G., 2019. Queer cases unmake gendered law, or, fucking law’s gendering function. Australian feminist law journal, 45 (1), 15–62.10.1080/13200968.2019.1667777
- Bainham, A., 1999. Parentage, parenthood and parental responsibility: subtle, elusive yet important distinctions. In: A. Bainham, S. Sclater, M. Richards, eds. What is a parent? A socio-legal analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 25–46.
- Bainham, A., 2008. What is the point of birth registration? Child and Family Quarterly [ online], 20 (4), 449–474.
- Bartlett, K., 1984. Rethinking Parenthood As an Exclusive Status: The Need for Legal Alternatives When the Premise of the Nuclear Family Has Failed. Virginia Law Review, 70 (5), 879–963.
- Bower-Brown, S., 2022. Beyond mum and dad: gendered assumptions about parenting and the experiences of trans and/or non-binary parents in the UK. LGBTQ+ Family: An Interdisciplinary Journal [Online], 18 (3), 223–240.10.1080/27703371.2022.2083040
- Brodeala, E. and Peter-Spiess, M.-H., 2022. Surrogacy and same-sex parenthood before the european court of human rights: reflections in light of cases against Switzerland. Swiss review of international and european law, 3, 397–419.
- Brown, A., 2019. What Is the family of law? The Influence of the nuclear family. 1st ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Brown, A., 2021. Trans Parenthood and the Meaning of ‘Mother’, ‘Father’ and ‘Parent’—R (McConnell and YY) V Registrar General for England and Wales [2020] EWCA Civ 559. Medical law review, 29(1), pp. 157–171. 10.1093/medlaw/fwaa036
- Bucher, A., 2022. Mater semper certa est en Géorgie. Jusletter [ online], 16 May 2022, 1–12. ( jusletter.ch).
- Büchler, A. and Bertschi, N., 2013. Gewünschtes kind, geliehene mutter, zurückgewiesene eltern?: Leihmutterschaft in den USA und die anerkennung des kindesverhältnisses in der schweiz. FamPra.ch01/2013, Bern: Stämpfli, 33–56.
- Büchler, A. and Maranta, L., 2015. Surrogacy and international private law in Switzerland. In: B. Atkin, ed. The international survey of family law. 2015 Edition. Bristol: Jordan Publishing, 327–342.
- Callus, T., 2008. First ‘Designer Babies’, Now ‘A la Carte’ Parents. Family Law, 143–147.
- Davis, L. 2019. Re TT and YY: When a ‘Father’ Is a ‘Mother’. BioNews [Online], 1018. Available from: 10.1080/26895269.2020.1838394 [accessed 25 January 2024].
- Davis, L., 2024. The evolution of birth registration in england and wales and its place in contemporary law and society. The modern law review, 87(2), 317–342.10.1111/1468-2230.12836
- Fenton-Glynn, C., 2020. Deconstructing parenthood: what makes a “mother”? The cambridge law journal, 79 (1), 34–37.10.1017/S0008197320000227
- Fineman Albertson, M., 1995. The neutered mother, the sexual family and other twentieth century tragedies. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
- Golombok, S., 2020. We Are Family: what really matters for parents and children. 1st ed. London: Scribe Publications.
- Higgs, E., 2004. Life, death and statistics: civil registration, censuses and the work of the general register office, 1836-1952. Hatfield: Local Population Studies.
- Hobson, B. and Morgan, D., 2002. Introduction: making men into fathers. In: B. Hobson, ed. Making men into fathers: men, masculinities and the social politics of fatherhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–22.
- Hochl, K., 2022. Surrogacy Abroad – Swiss Federal Court Judgement of 7 February 2022 (5A_545/2020) [Online]. Available from: https://schaubhochl.ch/en/publications/surrogacy-abroad-swiss-federal-court-judgement-of-7-february-2022/ [Accessed 2 April 2024].
- Horsey, K., et al. 2022. UK surrogates’ characteristics, experiences, and views on surrogacy law reform. International journal of law, policy and the family, 36 (1). https://academic.oup.com/lawfam/article/36/1/ebac030/6917125.
- Horsey, K., 2024. The future of surrogacy: a review of current global trends and national landscapes. Reproductive biomedicine online, 48 (5), 103764.10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103764
- Horsey, K. and Jackson, E., 2023. The Human fertilisation and embryology Act 1990 and non-traditional families. The modern law review, 86 (6), 1472–1488.10.1111/1468-2230.12818
- Hotz, S. and Saint-Phor, J., 2022. Reconnaissance de la filiation suite au recours à la “maternité de substitution” – un rappel de la ratio legis, analyse de l´arrêt du Tribunal federal 5A_545/2020, Newsletter droitmatrimonial ch, juin 2022, Université de Neuchâtel, 1-20.
- Jackson, E., 2006. What Is a Parent?. In: A. Diduck and K. O´Donovan, eds. Feminist perspectives on family law. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 59–74.
- Karsay, D., 2021. Stuck on the swing: experiences of trans parents with freedom of movement in the EU. TGEU [Online]. Available from: https://tgeu.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/stuck-on-the-swing.pdf [Accessed 25 January 2024].
- Mahmoud, Z., 2022. Surrogates across the Atlantic: Comparing the Impact of Legal and Health Regulatory Frameworks on Surrogates’ Autonomy, Health, and Wellbeing’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Exeter.
- Mahmoud, Z. and Romanis, E.C., 2023. On gestation and motherhood. Medical law review, 31 (1), 109–140. 10.1093/medlaw/fwac030
- Margaria, A., 2020. Trans men giving birth and reflections on fatherhood: what to expect? International journal of law, policy and the family, 34 (3), 225–246. 10.1093/lawfam/ebaa007
- Margaria, A., 2024. Trans(forming) fatherhood? European legal approaches to ‘seahorse fatherhood’. In: K. Duden and D. Wiedemann, eds. Changing families, changing family law in Europe. Cambridge: Intersentia Ltd, 177–194.
- McCandless, J., 2011. The changing form of birth registration? In: F. Ebtehaj, J. Herring, M. Johnson, and M. Richards, eds. Birth Rites and rights. 1st ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 187–204.
- McCandless, J., 2016. Should the law commission take a look at the birth registration system? BioNews [Online]. 873. Available from: https://www.progress.org.uk/newsletter_issue/bionews-873/ [Accessed 25 January 2024].
- McCandless, J., 2017. Reforming birth registration law in england and wales? Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 4, 52–58. doi:10.1016/j.rbms.2017.07.001
- McCandless, J. and Sheldon, S., 2010. The human fertilisation and embryology Act (2008) and the tenacity of the sexual family Form 1. The modern law review, 73 (2), 175–207. 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00790.x
- Milanich, N., 2017. Certain mothers, uncertain fathers: placing assisted reproductive technologies in historical perspective. In: Y. Ergas, J. Jenson, and S. Michel, eds. Reassembling motherhood: procreation and care in a globalized world. New York City: Columbia University Press, 17–37.
- O´Donovan, K. and Marshall, J., 2006. After birth: decisions about becoming a mother. In: A. Diduck and K. O´Donovan, eds. Feminist perspectives on family law. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 101–122.
- Riggs, D.W., et al. 2021. Trans parenting. In: A. O’Reilly, ed. Maternal theory: essential readings. Ontario, Canada Demeter Press, 807–815.
- Romanis, E.C., 2021. Abortion & ‘artificial wombs’: would ‘artificial womb’ technology legally empower non-gestating genetic progenitors to participate in decisions about how to terminate pregnancy in england and wales? Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 8 (1), 1–36.10.1093/jlb/lsab011
- Scherpe, J.M., 2018. Breaking the existing paradigms of parent–child relationships. In: G. Douglas, M. Murch, and V. Stephens, eds. International and national perspectives on child and family law: essays in honour of nigel lowe. Cambridge: Intersentia Ltd, 343–359.
- Siegl, V., et al. 2021. Transnationale reproduktive Mobilität aus der Schweiz (Stellungnahmen und Gutachten zur Fortpflanzungsmedizin). Bern: Bundesamt für Gesundheit. Available from: https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/en/home/medizin-und-forschung/fortpflanzungsmedizin/stellungnahmen-gutachten.html [Accessed 25 January 2024].
- Sørlie, A., 2018. Governing (Trans)parenthood: the tenacious hold of biological connection and heterosexuality. In: D. Otto, ed. Ring international law: possibilities, alliances, complicities, risks. 1st ed. London: Routledge, 171–190.
- Van Beers, B. and Bosch, L., 2020. A revolution by stealth: a legal-ethical analysis of the rise of pre-conception authorization of surrogacy agreements. The New Bioethics, 26 (4), 351–371.10.1080/20502877.2020.1836464
- Willekens, H., 2019. Motherhood as a legal institution: a historical-sociological introduction. In: H. Willekens, K. Scheiwe, T. Richarz, and E. Schumann, eds. Motherhood and the law. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag, 21–52.
Legislation
- Adoption and Children Act, 2002, c. 38. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/38/contents [Accessed on 26 Apr 2024].
- Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Council of Europe Treaty Series 005. 1950. Council of Europe.
- Federal Act on Medically Assisted Reproduction of 18 December 1998, CC 810.11. Available from: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2000/554/en [Accessed 25 January 2024].
- Federal Act on Private International Law of 18 December 1987, CC 291. Available from: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1988/1776_1776_1776/de [Accessed 25 January 2024].
- Federal Constitution of the Swiss Confederation, 18 April 1999. Available from: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/oc/1999/404/de [Accessed 25 January 2024].
- Gender Recognition Act 2004, c. 7. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/7/contents [Accessed 2 April 2024].
- Human Rights Act, 1998, c. 42. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents [Accessed 25 April]
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act, 2008. c. 22. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22/contents [Accessed 2 April 2024].
- Swiss Civil Code, 1907. Available at: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/24/233_245_233/en [Accessed 25 January 2024].
- Swiss Federal Council, 1996. Message on the Popular Initiative “For the Protection of Humans from Manipulation in Reproductive Technology and on a Federal Act on Medically Assisted Reproduction (Author’s Translation), BBl 1996 III 205. Available from: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/fga/1996/3_205_197_189/de (German version) [Accessed 25 January 2024].
Case-law
- Advisory Opinion concerning the recognition in domestic law of a legal parent-child relationship between a child born through a gestational surrogacy arrangement abroad and the intended mother, 2019. Request No. P16-2018-001. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22003-6380464-8364383%22]} [Accessed on 25 Apr 2024].
- Court of Appeal of Toulose (6th Ch.), No 20/03128, 9 February 2022.
- German Federal Court of Justice, XII ZB 127/19, 26 January 2022,
- German Federal Court of Justice, XII ZB 660/14, 6 September 2017,
- O.H. and G.H. v Germany, 2023. Applications Nos 53568/18 and 54741/18. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-227669%22]} [Accessed 25 January 2024].
- R (McConnell and YY) v Registrar General for England and Wales, 2020. EWCA Civ 559.
- Re TT and YY., 2019. EWHC 2384 (Fam).
- R(JK) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. 2015. EWHC 990 (Admin).
- Stockholm Administrative District Court, Case No 24685-13, 14 April 2014.
- Swiss Federal Supreme Court, 2015a. BGE (Published Decision of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court). 141 III 312.
- Swiss Federal Supreme Court, 2015b. BGE (Published Decision of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court), 141 III 328.
- Swiss Federal Supreme Court, 2022a. BGE (Published Decision of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court), 148 III 245.
- Swiss Federal Supreme Court, 2022b. BGE (Published Decision of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court), 148 III 384.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112442/MPU-social-sciences.png"})