Publication Cover
Educational Action Research
Connecting Research and Practice for Professionals and Communities
Volume 22, 2014 - Issue 2
11,607
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

When ‘research ethics’ become ‘everyday ethics’: the intersection of inquiry and practice in practitioner research

Pages 146-158 | Received 20 Feb 2013, Accepted 25 Jul 2013, Published online: 12 Dec 2013

References

  • Atkinson, E. 2000. “In Defence of Ideas, or Why ‘What Works’ is Not Enough.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 21 (3): 307–330.
  • Biesta, G. 2007. “Why ‘What Works’ won’t Work: Evidence-Based Practice and the Democratic Deficit in Educational Research.” Educational Theory 57 (1): 1–22.
  • Biesta, G. 2010. “Why ‘What Works’ Still won’t Work: From Evidence-Based Education to Value-Based Education.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 29 (5): 491–503.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1998. On Television and Journalism. Translated by P. P. Ferguson. London: Pluto Press.
  • Bourdieu, P., and L. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., and S. Lytle. 1993. Inside/outside: Teacher Research and Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Teachers’ College.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., and S. Lytle. 2001. “Beyond Certainty: Taking an Inquiry Stance on Practice.” In Teachers Caught in the Action: Professional Development That Matters, edited by A. Lieberman and L. Miller, 45–58. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., and S. Lytle. 2004. “Practitioner Inquiry, Knowledge, and University Culture.” In International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, edited by J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, and T. L. Russell, Vol. 1, 601–649. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., and S. Lytle. 2007. “Everything’s Ethics: Practitioner Inquiry and University Culture.” In An Ethical Approach to Practitioner Research: Dealing with Issues and Dilemmas in Action Research, edited by A. Campbell and S. Groundwater-Smith, 24–41. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., and S. Lytle. 2008. “Teacher Research as Stance.” In Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by B. Somekh and S. Noffke, 39–49. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., and S. Lytle. 2009. Inquiry as Stance: Practitioner Research for the Next Generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Dadds, M. 1993. “The Feeling of Thinking in Professional Self-Study.” Educational Action Research 1 (2): 287–303.
  • Fielding, M. 2011. “Patterns of Partnership: Student Voice, Intergenerational Learning and Democratic Fellowship.” In Rethinking Educational Practice through Reflexive Inquiry: Essays in Honour of Susan Groundwater-Smith, edited by N. Mockler and J. Sachs, 61–75. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Furlong, J., and A. Oancea. 2006. “Assessing Quality in Applied and Practice-Based Research in Education: A Framework for Discussion.” Review of Australian Research in Education: Counterpoints on the Quality and Impact of Educational Research 6: 89–104.
  • Groundwater-Smith, S., J. Mitchell, N. Mockler, P. Ponte, and K. Ronnerman. 2013. Facilitating Practitioner Research: Developing Transformational Partnerships. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Groundwater-Smith, S., and N. Mockler. 2005. “Practitioner Research in Education: Beyond Celebration.” Refereed paper presented at the AARE Focus Conference, James Cook University, Cairns, July.
  • Groundwater-Smith, S., and N. Mockler. 2006. “Research That Counts: Practitioner Research and the Academy.” Review of Australian Research in Education: Counterpoints on the Quality and Impact of Educational Research 6: 105–117.
  • Groundwater-Smith, S., and N. Mockler. 2007. “Ethics in Practitioner Research: An Issue of Quality.” Research Papers in Education 22 (2): 199–211.
  • Groundwater-Smith, S., and N. Mockler. 2009. Teacher Professional Learning in an Age of Compliance: Mind the Gap. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Hargreaves, D. 1996. Teaching as a Research Based Profession. London: Teacher Training Agency.
  • Kemmis, S. 2006. “Participatory Action Research and the Public Sphere.” Educational Action Research 14 (4): 459–476.
  • Lather, P. 1991. Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern. New York: Routledge.
  • Lingard, B., and S. Rawolle. 2004. “Mediatizing Educational Policy: The Journalistic Field, Science Policy, and Cross-Field Effects.” Journal of Education Policy 19 (3): 361–380.
  • Mockler, N. 2011. “Beyond ‘What Works’: Understanding Teacher Identity as a Practical and Political Tool.” Teachers and Teaching 17 (5): 517–528.
  • Mockler, N. 2013. “The Slippery Slope to Efficiency? An Australian Perspective on School/University Partnerships for Teacher Professional Learning.” Cambridge Journal of Education 42 (3): 273–289
  • O’Neill, O. 2002. A Question of Trust: The 2002 Reith Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oancea, A., and J. Furlong. 2007. “Expressions of Excellence and the Assessment of Applied and Practice-Based Research.” In Assessing Quality in Applied and Practice-Based Research in Education: Continuing the Debate, edited by J. Furlong and A. Oancea, 119–137. London: Routledge.
  • Rawolle, S. 2005. “Cross-Field Effects and Temporary Social Fields: A Case Study of the Mediatization of Recent Australian Knowledge Economy Policies.” Journal of Education Policy 20 (6): 705–724.
  • Stenhouse, L. 1981. “What Counts as Research?” British Journal of Educational Studies 29 (2): 103–114.
  • Taubman, P. 2009. Teaching by Numbers: Deconstructing the Discourse of Standards and Accountability in Education. New York: Routledge.
  • Taubman, P. 2011. “Making Nothing Happen: Affective Life under Audit.” In Curriculum in Today’s World: Configuring Knowledge, Identities, Work and Politics (World Yearbook of Education 2011), edited by L. Yates and M. Grumet, 155–173. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
  • Wacquant, L. 1989. “Towards a Reflexive Sociology: A Workshop with Pierre Bourdieu.” Sociological Theory 7 (1): 26–63.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.