Publication Cover
Educational Action Research
Connecting Research and Practice for Professionals and Communities
Volume 23, 2015 - Issue 2
434
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Mirror, mirror on the wall: email as an object of practitioner inquiry

Pages 271-289 | Received 07 Jul 2012, Accepted 20 Oct 2014, Published online: 12 Dec 2014

References

  • Appleman, D. 2009. Critical Encounters in High School English. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Attard, K. 2012. “The Role of Narrative Writing in Improving Professional Practice.” Educational Action Research 20 (1): 161–175.10.1080/09650792.2012.647754
  • Baugh, J. 1999. Out of the Mouths of Slaves. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Cameron, L. 2008. “Metaphor and Talk.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, edited by Raymond W. Gibbs Jr., 197–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Carr, N. 2011. The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research. New York: Routledge Falmer.
  • Carroll, L. (1897) 2010. Through the Looking Glass. Seattle, WA: Pacific Publishing Studio.
  • Caspi, A., and P. Gorsky. 2006. “Online Deception: Prevalence, Motivation, and Emotion.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 9 (1): 54–59.10.1089/cpb.2006.9.54
  • Cochran-Smith, M. S., and S. Lytle. 2009. Inquiry as Stance. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Cruz, J. 2012. “Control Reckless For-Profit Colleges.” The New York Times, May 12. Accessed June 2, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/05/12/easing-the-pain-of-student-loans/control-reckless-for-profit-colleges
  • Ellingson, L. 2009. “Introduction to Crystallization.” In Engaging Crystallization in Qualitative Research: An Introduction, by L. Ellingson, 1–27. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ellsworth, E. 1996. “Situated Response-ability to Student Papers.” Theory into Practice 35 (2): 138–143.10.1080/00405849609543714
  • Foucault, M. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Random House.
  • Gallagher, K. 2010. “Why I Will Not Teach to the Test.” Education Week. November 17. http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/11/17/12gallagher_ep.h30.html
  • Gawande, A. 2007. Better: A Surgeon’s Notes on Performance. New York: Picador.
  • Goswami, D., and M. Rutherford. 2009. “What’s Going on Here?: Seeking Answers through Teacher Inquiry.” In On Teacher Inquiry: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research, edited by D. Goswami, C. Lewis, M. Rutherford, and D. Waff, 1–11. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Grimm, J., and W. Grimm. 1972. Snow-White and the Seven Dwarfs. Translated by Randall Jarrell. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
  • Harvie, D. 2007. “Academic Labor: Producing Value and Producing Struggle.” In Reviewing Dialogues in Marxism and Education, edited by A. Green, G. Rikowsk, and H. Raduntz, 231–247. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kincheloe, J. L. 2003. “Engaging in Critical Ontology: Teachers as Researchers of Self-production.” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 19 (1): 47–64.
  • Kohl, H. 1992. “I Won’t Learn from You.” Rethinking Schools 7 (1): 16–20.
  • Kuntz, A. M. 2010. “Representing Representation.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 23 (4): 423–433.10.1080/09518398.2010.492769
  • Labaree, D. 1997. How to Succeed in School * Without Really Learning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Leitch, R., and C. Day. 2000. “Action Research and Reflective Practice: Towards a Holistic View.” Educational Action Research 8 (1): 179–193.10.1080/09650790000200108
  • Leitch, V. 2008. Living with Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Luke, M., and C. Gordon. 2011. “A Discourse Analysis of School Counselor Supervisory E-mail.” Counselor Education and Supervision 50 (4): 274–291.
  • Lytle, S. 2008. “At Last: Practitioner Inquiry and the Practice of Teaching: Some Thoughts on ‘Better’.” Research in the Teaching of English 42 (3): 373–379.
  • Macherey, P. 1978. A Theory of Literary Production. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • MacNeil, L. M. 2005. “Creating New Inequalities: Contradictions of Reform.” In Critical Social Issues in American Education: Democracy and Meaning in a Globalizing World, edited by H. S. Shapiro and D. E. Purpel, 77–88. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • McCornack, S. 1997. “The Generation of Deceptive Messages: Laying the Groundwork for a Viable Theory of Interpersonal Deception.” In Message Production: Advances in Communication Theory, edited by J. O. Greene, 91–126. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • McWhorter, J. 2000. Spreading the Word: Language and Dialect in America. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Miller, A. 1949. Death of a Salesman. New York: Penguin Books. 1976.
  • Milroy, J. 1999. “The Consequences of Standardization in Descriptive Linguistics.” In Standard English: The Widening Debate, edited by T. Bex and R. J. Watts, 16–39. London: Routledge.
  • Munby, H., and T. Russell. 1990. “Metaphors in the Study of Teachers’ Professional Knowledge.” Theory into Practice 29 (2): 116–121.
  • Ogbu, J. U. 1978. Minority Education and Caste: The American System in Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
  • Ogbu, J. U. 1987. “Variability in Minority School Performance: A Problem in Search of an Explanation.” Anthropology and Education Quarterly 18 (4): 312–334.10.1525/aeq.1987.18.4.04x0022v
  • Powell, A. G., E. Farrar, and D. K. Cohen. 1985. The Shopping Mall High School. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Ravitch, D. 2010. The Death and Life of the Great American School System. New York: Basic Books.
  • Richardson, L. 1994. “Writing: A Method of Inquiry.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 516–529. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Rymes, B. 2001. Conversational Borderlands. Language and Identity in an Alternative Urban High School. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
  • Rymes, B. 2009. Classroom Discourse Analysis. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Seitz, J. 1999. Motives for Metaphor: Literacy, Curriculum Reform, and the Teaching of English. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Stobart, G. 2008. Testing Times: The Uses and Abuses of Assessment. London: Routledge.
  • Tapscott, D. 2009. Grown up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Thompson, B. 2008. “Characteristics of Parent-teacher Email Communication.” Communication Education 57 (2): 201–223.10.1080/03634520701852050
  • Thompson, N., and J. Pascal. 2012. “Developing Critically Reflective Practice.” Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives 13 (2): 311–325.10.1080/14623943.2012.657795
  • Tidwell, L. C., and J. B. Walther. 2002. “Computer-mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluation: Getting to Know One Another a Bit at a Time.” Human Communication Research 28 (3): 317–348.10.1111/hcre.2002.28.issue-3
  • Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Touchstone Books.
  • Turkle, S. 2005. The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Turkle, S. 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
  • Walther, J. B. 1996. “Computer-mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction.” Communication Research 23 (1): 3–43.10.1177/009365096023001001
  • Walther, J. 2011. “Theories of Computer-mediated Communication and Interpersonal Relations.” In The Sage Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, edited by M. L. Knapp and J. A. Daly, 443–479. London: Sage. Accessed June 2, 2012. http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/42241_14.pdf
  • Whitehead, J. 2009. “Generating Living Theory and Understanding in Action Research Studies.” Action Research 7 (1): 95–99.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.