Generating knowledge in a Learning Study – from the perspective of a teacher researcher

References

• Alamargot, D. and M. Fayol. 2009. “Modelling the Development of Written Composition.” In The SAGE Handbook of Writing Development, edited by R. Beard, D. Myhill, M. Nystrand and J. Riley, 23–47. SAGE Publications Ltd. (e-book).
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. 2002. Making Stories: Law, Literature, Life. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Bulterman-Bos, J. 2008. “Will a Clinical Approach Make Education Research More Relevant for Practice?” Educational Researcher 37 (7): 412–420.10.3102/0013189X08325555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I. 2012. “The Learning Study as an Approach for “Clinical” Subject Matter Didactic Research.” International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 1 (2): 126–139.10.1108/20468251211224172
   Google Scholar
• Christie, F., and B. Derewianka. 2008. School Discourse. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. Lytle. 1999. “The Teacher Research Movement: A Decade Later.” Educational Researcher 28 (7): 15–25.10.3102/0013189X028007015
   Google Scholar
• Elbow, P. 2000. Everyone Can Write. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 1991. Action Research for Educational Change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 2012. “Developing a Science of Teaching through Lesson Study.” International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 1 (2): 108–125.10.1108/20468251211224163
   Google Scholar
• Garton, A., and C. Pratt. 1989. Learning to Be Literate: The Development of Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Graham. S. 2006. “Strategy Instruction and the Teaching of Writing.” In Handbook of Writing Research, edited by C. MacArthur and S. Graham, 187–207. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, H.D. 1991. Build a literate classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., R. Gallimore, and J.W. Steigler. 2002. “A Knowledge Base for the Teaching Profession: What Would It Look like and How Can We Get One?” Educational Researcher 31 (5): 3–15.10.3102/0013189X031005003
   Google Scholar
• Kullberg, A. 2007. "Can Lessons be Replicated?" In Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 3, edited by J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park and S. Y. Seo, 121–128. Seoul: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Labaree, D.F. 2003. “The Peculiar Problems of Preparing Educational Researchers.” Educational Researcher 32 (4): 13–22.10.3102/0013189X032004013
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. 1990. “When the Problem is Not the Question and the Solution is Not the Answer: Mathematical Knowing and Teaching.” American Educational Research 27 (1): 29–63.10.3102/00028312027001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, S. 2005. “Om kvalitet i kvalitativa studier [Quality in Qualitative Studies].” Nordisk Pedagogik 1 (25): 16–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. 2009. “What is the Nature of Knowledge Development in Lesson Study?” Educational Action Research 17 (1), 95–110.10.1080/09650790802667477
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M.L. 2012. Variation Theory and the Improvement of Teaching and Learning. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, I. 1984. Språk och läsning [Language and Reading]. Umeå: Unitryck.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. 2015. Necessary Conditions of Learning. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and S. Booth. 1997. Learning and Awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and U. Runesson. 2015. “The Idea and Practice of the Learning Study.” In Realising Learning. Teachers’ Professional Development through Lesson and Learning Study, edited by K. Wood and S.V. Sithamparam, 103–121. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D. 2006. “Cognitive Factors in the Development of Children’s Writing.” In Handbook of Writing Research, edited by C. MacArthur and S. Graham, 115–130. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P., and D. Burgess. 2008. “Exploring Types of Educational Action Research: Implications for Research Validity.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 7 (4): 18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, Á., E. Soto, and J. Serván. 2010. “Participatory Action Research and the Reconstruction of Teachers’ Practical Thinking: Lesson Studies and Core Refelection. An Experience in Spain.” Educational Action Research 18 (1): 73–87.10.1080/09650790903484533
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1962. Tacit Knowledge. Terry lectures, Yale.
   Google Scholar
• Runesson, U., and G. Gustavsson. 2012. "Sharing and Developing Knowledge Products from Learning Study." International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 1 (3): 245–260.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B., and K. Zeichner. 2009. “Action Research for Educational Reform: Remodelling Action Research Theories and Practices in Local Contexts.” Educational Action Research 17 (1): 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. 1981. “What Counts as Research?” British Journal of Educational Studies 2 (103–114): 15.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, M.S.Y. 2014. “Enriching a Collaborative Teacher Inquiry Discourse: Exploring Teachers’ Experiences of a Theory-Framed Discourse in a Singapore Case of Lesson Study.” Educational Action Research 22 (3): 411–427.10.1080/09650792.2014.880360
   Google Scholar
• Temizkan, M. 2011. “The Effect of Creative Writing Activities on the Story Writing Skill.” Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 11 (1): 933–939.
   Google Scholar
• Thorsten, A. 2014. "Perspektiv och problemlösning i berättelseskrivande. Vad elever behöver lära sig och hur det kan synliggöras i undervisningen." [Perspectives and problem solving in story writing. What pupils need to learn and how teaching can make it visible.] Licentiate thesis, Jönköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Thorsten, A. 2015. "How Teachers’ Practice Knowledge is Used and Challenged in a Learning Study Using Variation Theory as a Tool." International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 4 (3): 274–287.
   Google Scholar
• Waitman, G.R. and J.A. Plucker. 2009. “Teaching Writing by Demythologizing Creativity.” In The Psychology of Creative Writing, edited by S.B. Kaufman, 287–315. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627101
   Google Scholar