Action research in science education – an analytical review of the literature

References

• Abels, S. 2015. “Implementing Inquiry-Based Science Education to Foster Emotional Engagement of Special Needs Students.” In Affective Dimensions in Chemistry Education, edited by M. Kahveci and M. Orgill, 107–131. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Akerson, V., and K. A. Reinkens. 2002. “Preparing Preservice Elementary Teachers to Teach for Conceptual Change: A Case Study.” Journal of Elementary Science Education 14: 29–45.10.1007/BF03174735
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge, J. M., B. J. Fraser, L. Bell, and J. Dorman. 2012. “Using a New Learning Environment Questionnaire for Reflection in Teacher Action Research.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 23: 259–290.10.1007/s10972-012-9268-1
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J. R., P. J. Fensham, R. F. Gunstone, and R. T. White. 1991. “The Importance of Reflection in Improving Science Teaching and Learning.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28: 163–182.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bencze, L., and D. Hodson. 1999. “Changing Practice by Changing Practice: Toward More Authentic Science and Science Curriculum Development.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36: 521–539.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner, G. 1986. “Constructivism: A Theory of Knowledge.” Journal of Chemical Education 63: 873–878.10.1021/ed063p873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner, G., D. MacIssac, and S. White. 1999. “Action Research: Overcoming the Sports Mentality Approach to Assessment/Evaluation.” University Chemistry Education 3: 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Briscoe, C., and E. Wells. 2002. “Reforming Primary Science Assessment Practices: A Case Study of One Teacher’s Professional Development through Action Research.” Science Education 86: 417–435.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, G. A., and J. G. Cordes. 2005. “An Action Research Project on Preparing Teachers to Meet the Needs of Underserved Student Populations.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 16: 43–64.10.1007/s10972-005-6991-x
   Google Scholar
• Burmeister, M., and I. Eilks. 2012. “An Example of Learning about Plastics and Their Evaluation as a Contribution to Education for Sustainable Development in Secondary School Chemistry Teaching.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 13: 93–102.10.1039/C1RP90067F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burmeister, M., and I. Eilks. 2013. “Using Participatory Action Research to Develop a Course Module on Education for Sustainable Development in Pre-Service Chemistry Teacher Education.” Centre for Educational Policy Studies Journal 3: 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Capobianco, B. M. 2007. “Science Teachers’ Attempts at Integrating Feminist Pedagogy through Collaborative Action Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44: 1–32.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. J., and H. Hollingsworth. 2002. “Elaborating a Model of Teacher Professional Growth.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18: 947–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. M. 2004. “A Call for Action (Research): Applying Science Education Research to Computer Science Instruction.” Computer Science Education 14: 343–364.10.1080/0899340042000303474
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 2009. “Teacher Research as Stance.” In The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by S. E. Noffke and B. Somekh, 39–49. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.10.4135/9780857021021
   Google Scholar
• Cronje, J. C. 2009. “Qualitative Assessment across Language Barriers: An Action Research Study.” Educational Technology & Society 12: 69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, V., P. Forster, and D. Reid. 2006. “Information Communication Technology (ICT) Integration in a Science Education Unit for Preservice Science Teachers; Students’ Perceptions of Their ICT Skills, Knowledge and Pedagogy.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 4: 345–363.10.1007/s10763-005-9003-x
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, O. 2000. “Crossing the Borders: Chemical Education Research and Teaching Practice.” University Chemistry Education 4 (1): 31–34.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers, M. R. 2007. “An Action Research Approach to the Design, Development and Evaluation of an Interactive E-Learning Tutorial in a Cognitive Domain.” Journal of Information Technology Education 6: 455–479.
   Google Scholar
• Dymond, S. K., A. Renzaglia, A. Rosenstein, E. J. Jung, R. A. Banks, V. Niswander, and C. J. Gilson. 2006. “Using a Participatory Action Research Approach to Create a Universally Designed Inclusive High School Science Course: A Case Study.” Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 31: 293–308.10.1177/154079690603100403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilks, I. 2003. “Co-Operative Curriculum Development in a Project of Participatory Action Research within Chemical Education: Teachers’ Reflections.” Science Education International 14 (4): 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Eilks, I. 2005. “Experiences and Reflections about Teaching Atomic Structure in a Jigsaw Classroom in Lower Secondary School Chemistry Lessons.” Journal of Chemical Education 82: 313–320.10.1021/ed082p313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilks, I. 2013. “Action Research in Science Education – From General Justifications towards a Specific Model in Practice.” In Action Research, Innovation and Change: International Perspectives Across Disciplines, edited by T. Stern, F. Rauch, A. Schuster, and A. Townsend, 156–176. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eilks, I., and S. Markic. 2011. “Effects of a Long-Term Participatory Action Research Project on Science Teachers’ Professional Development.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 7: 149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Eilks, I., and B. Ralle. 2002. “Participatory Action Research in Chemical Education.” In Research in Chemical Education - What Does This Mean?, edited by B. Ralle and I. Eilks, 87–98. Aachen: Shaker.
   Google Scholar
• Eilks, I., J. Möllering, and N. Valanides. 2007. “Seventh-Grade Students’ Understanding of Chemical Reactions – Reflections from an Action Research Interview Study.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 4: 271–286.
   Google Scholar
• Eilks, I., S. Markic, and T. Witteck. 2010. “Collaborative Innovation of the Science Classroom by Participatory Action Research – Theory and Practice in a Project of Implementing Cooperative Learning Methods in Chemistry Education.” In Facilitating Effective Student Learning Through Teacher Research and Innovation, edited by M. Valenčič Zuljan and J. Vogrinc, 77–101. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, X. 2009. “Development of a Community of Science Teachers: Participation in a Collaborative Action Research Project.” School Science and Mathematics 109: 95–107.10.1111/ssm.2009.109.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, X., and W. Melville. 2008. “Science Teacher Development through Collaborative Action Research.” Teacher Development 12 (3): 193–209.
   Google Scholar
• Feierabend, T., and I. Eilks. 2011. “Innovating Science Teaching by Participatory Action Research – Reflections from an Interdisciplinary Project on Curriculum Development in the Field of Climate Change.” Centre for Educational Policy Studies Journal 1: 93–112.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, A. 1996. “Enhancing the Practice of Physics Teachers: Mechanisms for the Generation and Sharing of Knowledge and Understanding in Collaborative Action Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33: 513–540.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gipe, J. P., and J. Richards. 1992. “Reflective Thinking and Growth in Novices’ Teaching Abilities.” The Journal of Educational Research 86: 52–57.10.1080/00220671.1992.9941827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodenough, K. 2008. “Dealing with Messiness and Uncertainty in Practitioner Research: The Nature of Participatory Action Research.” Canadian Journal of Education 31: 431–458.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnough, K. 2010. “Teacher Learning and Collaborative Action Research: Generating a “Knowledge-of-Practice” in the Context of Science Education.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 21: 917–935.10.1007/s10972-010-9215-y
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, D., A. Meyer, and D. H. Rose. 2014. Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Practice. Wakefield: CAST.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, K., R. Chang, and A. Radloff. 2007. “Enhancing the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Evaluation of a Scheme to Improve Teaching and Learning through Action Research.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 19 (1): 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Grundy, S. 1982. “Three Modes of Action Research.” Curriculum Perspectives 2 (3): 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Gynnild, V., J. Tyssedal, and L. Lorentzen. 2005. “Approaches to Study and the Quality of Learning. Some Empirical Evidence from Engineering Education.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3: 587–607.10.1007/s10763-005-5178-4
   Google Scholar
• Hohloch, J., N. Grove, and S. L. Bretz. 2007. “Pre-Service Teacher as Researcher: The Value of Inquiry in Learning Science.” Journal of Chemical Education 84: 1530–1534.10.1021/ed084p1530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, M. 1993. “Linking the Practitioner and Researcher Communities for School Improvement.” School Effectiveness and School Improvements 4: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, J., and M. D. Burghardt. 2002. “Design Technology in the Elementary School - a Study of Teacher Action Research.” Journal of Technology Education 13 (2): 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F. A. J. 1985. “Reflective Teaching and Preservice Teacher Education in the Netherlands.” Journal of Teacher Education 36 (5): 11–15.10.1177/002248718503600502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, M., S. Kienast, T. Witteck, and I. Eilks. 2013. “On the Development and Assessment of a Computer-Based Learning and Assessment Environment for the Transition from Lower to Upper Secondary Chemistry Education.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 14: 345–353.10.1039/C3RP00071K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebak, K., and R. Tinsley. 2010. “Can Inquiry and Reflection Be Contagious? Science Teachers, Students, and Action Research.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 21: 953–970.10.1007/s10972-010-9216-x
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C. 2002. “Developing and Changing Practice in Special Educational Needs through Critically Reflective Action Research: A Case Study.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 17: 109–127.10.1080/08856250210129047
   Google Scholar
• Mamlok-Naaman, R., and I. Eilks. 2012. “Different Types of Action Research to Promote Chemistry Teachers’ Professional Development – A Joined Theoretical Reflection on Two Cases from Israel and Germany.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10: 581–610.10.1007/s10763-011-9306-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamlok-Naaman, R., O. Navon, R. Carmeli, and A. Hofstein. 2003. “Teachers Research Their Students’ Understanding of Electrical Conductivity.” Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry 62: 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mamlok-Naaman, R., F. Rauch, S. Markic, and C. Fernandez. 2013. “How to Keep Myself Being a Professional Chemistry Teacher.” In Teaching Chemistry – A Studybook, edited by I. Eilks and A. Hofstein, 269–297. Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6209-140-5
   Google Scholar
• Markic, S., and I. Eilks. 2006. “Cooperative and Context-Based Learning on Electrochemical Cells in Lower Secondary Science Lessons – A Project of Participatory Action Research.” Science Education International 17: 253–273.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, R., and I. Eilks. 2009. “Promoting Scientific Literacy Using a Socio-Critical and Problem-Oriented Approach in Chemistry Education: Concept, Examples, Experiences.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 4: 131–145.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, R., and I. Eilks. 2010. “Research-Based Development of a Lesson Plan on Shower Gels and Musk Fragrances following a Socio-Critical and Problem-Oriented Approach to Chemistry Teaching.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 11: 129–141.10.1039/C005357 K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, J. R., and M. Pearsall. 1998. “Teaching Elementary Science Methods to Women: A Male Professor’s Experience from Two Perspectives.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35: 919–949.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megowan-Romanowicz, C. 2011. “Inside out: Action Research from the Teacher-Researcher Perspective.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 21: 993–1011.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., and J. Osborne. 1998. Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future. London: King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P., and D. Burgess. 2008. “Exploring Types of Educational Action Research: Implications for Research Validity.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 7 (4): 18–30.10.1177/160940690800700402
   Google Scholar
• Noffke, S., and B. Somekh. 2009. “Action Research.” In Handbook of Action Research, edited by S. Noffke and B. Somekh, 89–96. New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue, R. B., N. Parks Board, and C. McNaught. 1991. “Environmental Education: The Development of a Curriculum through ‘Grass-Roots’ Reconstructive Action.” International Journal of Science Education 13: 391–404.10.1080/0950069910130403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önder, I., A. Kaplan, and S. Besoluk. 2011. “A Sample Science Education Activity in Multicultural Environment.” US-China Education Review 8: 110–117.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., and J. Dillon. 2008. Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Parke, H. M., and C. R. Coble. 1997. “Teachers Designing Curriculum as Professional Development: A Model for Transformational Science Teaching.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34: 773–789.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, T., and N. Nieveen, eds. 2013. Educational Design Research: Introduction and Illustrative Cases. Enschede: SLO.
   Google Scholar
• Riel, M. 2010. Understanding Action Research. Pepperdine University, Center for Collaborative Action Research. Accessed June 2, 2011. https://cadres.pepperdine.edu/ccar/define.html
   Google Scholar
• Scharmann, L. C. 2007. “A Dynamic Professional Development School Partnership in Science Education.” The Journal of Educational Research 100: 235–242.10.3200/JOER.100.4.235-242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, P. H., and R. H. Driver. 2003. “Learning about Science Teaching: Perspectives from an Action Research Project.” In International Handbook of Science Education, edited by B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin, 67–80. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, T. 2014. “What is Good Action Research?” In Action Research, Innovation and Change, edited by T. Stern, A. Townsend, F. Rauch, and A. Schuster, 202–220. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stolz, M., T. Witteck, R. Marks, and I. Eilks. 2013. “Reflecting Socio-Scientific Issues for Science Education Coming from the Case of Curriculum Development on Doping in Chemistry Education.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 9: 361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuckey, M., P. Heering, R. Mamlok-Naaman, A. Hofstein, and I. Eilks. 2015. “The Philosophical Works of Ludwik Fleck and Their Potential Meaning for Teaching and Learning Science.” Science & Education 24: 281–298.10.1007/s11191-014-9723-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuckey, M., R. Mamlok-Naaman, A. Hofstein, and I. Eilks. 2013. “The Meaning of, Relevance’ in Science Education and Its Implications for the Science Curriculum.” Studies in Science Education 49: 1–34.10.1080/03057267.2013.802463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukhontapatipak, C., and S. Srikosamatara. 2012. “The Role of Field Exercises in Ecological Learning and Values Education: Action Research on the Use of Campus Wetlands.” Journal of Biological Education 46: 36–44.10.1080/00219266.2011.554574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. R., and K. M. Zeichner. 1999. “Idea and Action: Action Research and the Development of Conceptual Change Teaching of Science.” Science Education 83: 309–322.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. 2001. “Constructing Chemical Concepts in the Classroom?: Using Research to Inform Practice.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe 2: 43–51.10.1039/B0RP90029 J
   Google Scholar
• Towns, M. H., K. Kreke, and A. Fields. 2000. “An Action Research Project: Student Perspectives on Small-Group Learning in Chemistry.” Journal of Chemical Education 77: 111.10.1021/ed077p111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauth-Nare, A., and G. Buck. 2011. “Using Reflective Practice to Incorporate Formative Assessment in a Middle School Science Classroom: A Participatory Action Research Study.” Educational Action Research 19: 379–398.10.1080/09650792.2011.600639
   Google Scholar
• Valanides, N., A. Nicolaidou, and I. Eilks. 2003. “Twelfth Grade Students’ Understanding of Oxidation and Combustion: Using Action Research to Improve Teachers’ Practical Knowledge and Teaching Practice.” Research in Science & Technological Education 21: 159–175.10.1080/0263514032000127211
   Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., D. Beijaard, and N. Verloop. 2001. “Professional Development and Reform in Science Education: The Role of Teachers’ Practical Knowledge.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38: 137–158.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, P., and J. Siraj-Blatchford. 2006. “Using Data Comparison and Interpretation to Develop Procedural Understandings in the Primary Classroom: Case Study Evidence from Action Research.” International Journal of Science Education 28: 443–467.10.1080/09500690500277896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, F. H., P. S. Smeaton, and T. G. Burns. 2002. “Action Research in the Secondary Science Classroom: Student Response to Differentiated, Alternative Assessment.” American Secondary Education 32 (3): 89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University.10.1017/CBO9780511803932
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. 2005. Action Research for Teachers: A Practical Guide. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J. B. 1986. “Starting Early: Girls and Engineering.” European Journal of Engineering Education 11: 271–279.10.1080/03043798608939308
   Google Scholar
• Witteck, T., and I. Eilks. 2006. “Max Sour Ltd. – Open Experimentation and Problem Solving in a Cooperative Learning Company.” School Science Review 88 (323): 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, P. 2003. “Teacher Research as Professional Development for p-educators in the U.S.” Educational Action Research 11: 301–326.10.1080/09650790300200211
   Google Scholar