Formative assessment: the role of participatory action research in blending policy and practice in Uganda

References

• Acana, S., D. Kyagaba, A. Opman, K. Omala, K. Jumanyol, and L.B. Sserunkuma. 2010. The Achievement of Primary School Pupils in Uganda in Numeracy, Literacy in English and Local Languages: National Assessment of Progress in Education. Kampala: Uganda National Examinations Board. http://www.uneb.ac.ug/Admin/images/MERGED_REPORT_2010_-_primary.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Akyeampong, K., J. Pryor, and J.G. Ampiah. 2006. “A Vision of Successful Schooling: Ghanaian Teachers’ Understandings of Learning, Teaching and Assessment.” Comparative Education 42 (2): 155–176. doi:10.1080/03050060600627936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akello, D.L., G. Timmerman, and S. Namusisi. 2015. “Teaching Reading and Writing in Local Language Using the Child-centred Pedagogy in Uganda.” Language and Education 30 (3): 252–266. doi:10.1080/09500782.2015.1106553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akello, L.D., and M.G. and Timmerman. 2017. “Local Language a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Way Forward.” Educational Action Research 1–19: doi:10.1080/09650792.2017.1319287.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. 2003. “Aligning Teaching and Assessing to Course Objectives.” Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations 2: 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliam. 2004. “Working Inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom.” Phi Delta Kappan 86 (1): 8–21. doi:10.1177/003172170408600105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2004. “The Formative Purpose: Assessment Must First Promote Learning.” Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education 103 (2): 20–50. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2004.tb00047.x.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G.A., and A.E. Trauth-Nare. 2009. “Preparing Teachers to Make the Formative Assessment Process Integral to Science Teaching and Learning.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 20 (5): 475–494. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9142-y.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P., D. Fuller, and P. Routledge. 2007. “Relating Action to Activism: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections.” In Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place, edited by S. L. Kindon, R. Pain, and M. Kesby, 216–222. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clynes, M.P., and S.E. Raftery. 2008. “Feedback: An Essential Element of Student Learning in Clinical Practice.” Nurse Education in Practice 8 (6): 405–411. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2008.02.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Draku, F. 2011. “Language Difficulties Thwart Implementation of Thematic Curriculum.” Uganda Radio Network, Kampala, March 19. http://ugandaradionetwork.com/a/story.php?s=32300.
   Google Scholar
• Eileen, F. 2000. Action Research. Providence, RI: Brown University. www.lab.brown.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2014. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Singapore: Sage. ISBN 978-1-84787-324-8.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Uganda. 1992. The Government White Paper on the Education Policy Review Commission Report. Kampala: UPPC.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D.J., W.F. Whyte, and I. Harkavy. 1993. “Participatory Action Research as a Process and as a Goal.” Human Relations 46 (2): 175–192. doi:10.1177/001872679304600203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, C.R, and G. Garg. 2015. Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. 3rd ed. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Leahy, S., C. Lyon, M. Thompson, and D. Wiliam. 2005. “Classroom Assessment: Minute-by-by and Day-by-by.” Educational Leadership 63 (3): 18–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, G., and R. Cox. 2001. “Assessing: Student Assessment.” In Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: The Reflective Practitioner, edited by S. Calkins, 200–235. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, B., and M. Jane Drummond. 2006. “How Teachers Engage with Assessment for Learning: Lessons from the Classroom.” Research Papers in Education 21 (2): 133–149. doi:10.1080/02671520600615638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTaggart, R. 1991. “Principles for Participatory Action Research.” Adult Education Quarterly 41 (3): 168–187. doi:10.1177/0001848191041003003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTighe, J., and K. O’Connor. 2005. “Seven Practices for Effective Learning.” Assessment to Promote Learning 63 (3): 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S.N., R.C. Reilly, and M.E. Logue. 2009. “Benefits of Collaborative Action Research for the Beginning Teacher.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (2): 344–349. doi:10.10.1016/j.tate.2008.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCDC (National Curriculum Development Centre). 2006. Primary School Curriculum, P.1-3. Kampala: National Curriculum Development Centre.
   Google Scholar
• NCDC (National Curriculum Development Centre). 2008. Pedagogy Handbook for Teaching in Local Language. Kampala: National Curriculum Development Centre. http://www.ncdc.go.ug.
   Google Scholar
• NCDC (National Curriculum Development Centre). 2012. Primary Curriculum Implementation Guidelines and Assessment Specifications. Kampala: National Curriculum Development Centre. http://www.ncdc.go.ug.
   Google Scholar
• Nordlof, J. 2014. “Vygotsky, Scaffolding, and the Role of Theory in Writing Center Work.” The Writing Center Journal 13 (1): 45–64 http://www.jstor.org/stable/43444147.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, B.L., J.L. Bottorff, and R. Hewat. 2003. “Blending Observational Methods: Possibilities, Strategies, and Challenges.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2 (1): 29–38 http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/2_1/html/patersonetal.html.10.1177/160940690300200103
   Google Scholar
• Penny, A., M. Ward, T. Read, and H. Bines. 2008. “Education Sector Reform: The Ugandan Experience.” International Journal of Educational Development 28 (3): 268–285. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., and B. Crossouard. 2008. “A Socio-Cultural Theorisation of Formative Assessment.” Oxford Review of Education 34 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/03054980701476386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, C. 2002. “The Impact of Assessment on Student Learning: How Can the Research Literature Practically Help to Inform the Development of Departmental Assessment Strategies and Learner-Centred Assessment Practices?” Active Learning in Higher Education 3 (2): 145–158. doi:10.1177/1469787402003002004.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D.R. 1998. “Formative Assessment: Revisiting the Territory.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1): 77–84. doi:10.1080/0969595980050104.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L.A. 2005. “Linking Formative Assessment to Scaffolding.” Educational Leadership 63 (3): 66–70. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov05/vol63/num03/Linking-Formative-Assessment-to-Scaffolding.aspx.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2013. Interpreting Qualitative Data: A Guide to the Principles of Qualitative Research. 4th ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S. 2011. “Getting to the Heart of Authentic Assessment for Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 18 (4): 433–449. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838.
   Google Scholar
• Timms, M., S. DeVelle, and D. Lay. 2016. “Towards a Model of How Learners Process Feedback: A Deeper Look at Learning.” Australian Journal of Education 60 (2): 128–145. doi:10.1177/0004944116652912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1978. “Interaction between Learning and Development.” Readings on the Development of Children 23 (3): 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M. 2009. “An Investigation into Written Comments on Assignments: Do Students Find Them Usable?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (1): 67–78. doi:10.1080/02602930801895752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, M.R. 2006. “Do Students Value Feedback? Student Perceptions of Tutors’ Written Responses.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (3): 379–394. doi:10.1080/02602930500353061.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. 2000. “How Do I Improve My Practice? Creating and Legitimating an Epistemology of Practice.” Reflective Practice 1 (1): 91–104. doi:10.1080/713693129.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. 2013. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar