Formative Scaffolding: how to alter the level and strength of self-efficacy and foster self-regulation in a mathematics test situation

References

• Ashcraft, M. 2002. “Math Anxiety: Personal, Educational, and Cognitive Consequences.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 11 (5): 181–185. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84 (2): 191. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2012. “On the Functional Properties of Perceived Self-Efficacy Revisited.” Journal of Management 38 (1): 9–44. doi:10.1177/0149206311410606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2009. “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (Formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education) 21 (1): 5–31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. 1999. “Participation, Knowledge and Beliefs: A Community Perspective on Mathematics Learning.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 40 (3): 259–281. doi:10.1023/A:1003880012282.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. 2002. “The Development of Disciplinary Relationships: Knowledge, Practice and Identity in Mathematics Classrooms.” For the Learning of Mathematics 22 (1): 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2000. “Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for the Learning Society.” Studies in Continuing Education 22 (2): 151–167. doi:10.1080/713695728.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., and P. H. Winne. 1995. “Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 65 (3): 245–281. doi:10.3102/00346543065003245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. 1988. “The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People’s Children.” Harvard Educational Review 58 (3): 280–299. doi:10.17763/haer.58.3.c43481778r528qw4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emig, J. 1977. “Writing as a Mode of Learning.” College Composition and Communication 28 (2): 122–128. doi:10.2307/356095.
   Google Scholar
• Fals-Borda, O., and M. A. Rahman. 1991. Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action-Research. New York, NY: Apex Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. 2001. “Students as Radical Agents of Change.” Journal of Educational Change 2 (2): 123–141. doi:10.1023/A:1017949213447.
   Google Scholar
• Greathouse, P. A. 2018. “Effects of a Positive Youth Development Approach to Literacy through Young Adult Literature in the Secondary Remedial Reading Class: An Action Research Study.” Educational Action Research 26 (2): 220–238. doi:10.1080/09650792.2017.1307127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadfield, M., and K. Haw. 2001. “‘Voice’, Young People and Action Research.” Educational Action Research 9 (3): 485–502. doi:10.1080/09650790100200165.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and G. C. Yates. 2013. Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, N. 2000. Thematic Qualitative Analysis. Doing Psychological Research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, D., and D. Clarke. 2006. “Scaffolding and Metacognition.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 37 (2): 127–143. doi:10.1080/00207390500285818.
   Google Scholar
• Kågesten, O., and J. Engelbrecht. 2006. “Supplementary Explanations in Undergraduate Mathematics Assessment: A Forced Formative Writing Activity.” European Journal of Engineering Education 31 (6): 705–715. doi:10.1080/03043790600911803.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, R. G., and C. Chimwayange. 2014. “Teacher Action Research and Student Voice: Making Sense of Learning in Secondary School.” Action Research 12 (1): 52–77. doi:10.1177/1476750313515282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., R. McTaggart, and R. Nixon. 2013. The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Singapore: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., J. Swafford, and B. Findell. 2001. Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, E. A., M. W. Schaeffer, and S. L. Beilock. 2013. “Mathematics Anxiety and Stereotype Threat: Shared Mechanisms, Negative Consequences and Promising Interventions.” Research in Mathematics Education 15 (2): 115–128. doi:10.1080/14794802.2013.797744.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthey, S. J., and E. B. Moje. 2002. “Identity Matters.” Reading Research Quarterly 37 (2): 228–238. doi:10.1598/RRQ.37.2.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, A. 2008. Participatory Action Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J. 2014. Writing and Doing Action Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, G. A., and D. Rutledge. 2018. “A Response to Strategies and Tactics through Participatory Action Research in A Developmental Mathematics Course.” Educational Action Research, 26(3), 420–438.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 2000. “The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Leaning.” In Handbook of Self Regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 451–502. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 2004. “A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students.” Educational Psychology Review 16 (4): 385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., and A. Zusho. 2002. “The Development of Academic Self-Regulation: The Role of Cognitive and Motivational Factors.” In Development of Achievement Motivation, edited by W. A and J. Eccles,  (pp. 249–284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, B., and B. S. Wiese. 2006. “New Perspectives for the Evaluation of Training Sessions in Self-Regulated Learning: Time-Series Analyses of Diary Data.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 31 (1): 64–96. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. 2005. “Self-Regulated Learning: The Educational Legacy of Paul R. Pintrich.” Educational Psychologist 40 (2): 85–94. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4002_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. 2013. Action Research: The Challenges of Understanding and Changing Practice. Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill International.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning. and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. M. 2010. “Outcome Expectancy and Self-Efficacy: Theoretical Implications of an Unresolved Contradiction.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 14: 417–425. doi:10.1177/1088868310368802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D., J. S. Bruner, and G. Ross. 1976. “The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17 (2): 89–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, C. B., S. S. Wu, and V. Menon. 2012. “The Neurodevelopmental Basis of Math Anxiety.” Psychological Science 23 (5): 492–501. doi:10.1177/0956797611429134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. “Attaining Self-Regulation. A Social Cognitive Perspective.” In Handbook of Self-Regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 13–39. London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2002. “Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41 (2): 64–70. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar