“It’s worth it”¹ practitioner research as a tool of professional learning: starting points, conclusions and benefits from the perspective of teacher-students

References

• Altrichter, H. 2003. “Forschende Lehrerbildung - Ein Mehrebenenmodell in Hochschuldidaktischer Perspektive.” In Forschendes Lernen. Theorie Und Praxis Einer Professionellen LehrerInnenausbildung, edited by A. Obolenski and H. Meyer, 151–163. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Altrichter, H. 2005. “The Role of the “Professional Community” in Action Research.” Educational Action Research 13 (1): 11–25. doi:10.1080/09650790500200274.
   Google Scholar
• Altrichter, H., and P. Posch. 2007. Lehrerinnen Und Lehrer Erforschen Ihren Unterricht. 4.th ed. Heilbrunn: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Altrichter, H., P. Posch, and B. Somekh. 2005. Teachers Investigate Their Work. An Introduction to the Methods of Action Research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amtmann, E., M. Matischek-Jauk, and G. Krammer. 2018. “Austria’s Innovative Initial Teacher Education Reform. Which Academic Teaching Competences Do First Semester Students Expect from Teacher Educators?” In 42nd ATEE Conference 2017. Changing perspectives and approaches in contemporary teaching. Conference proceedings, edited by M. Sablic, A. Skugor, and I. Durdevic Babic, 135–151. Brussels: Association for Teacher Education in Europe (ATEE).
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, K.H., T. Hascher, R. Messner, A. Niggli, and J.L. Party. 2011. Empowerment Im Schulpraktikum. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research. 2017. “Bologna-Monitoring Report.” Accessed 8 October 2018. https://bmbwf.gv.at/studium/der-europaeische-hochschulraum-und-die-europaeische-union/der-europaeische-hochschulraum-bologna-prozess-im-oesterreichischen-kontext/ueberpruefung-der-bologna-umsetzung/bologna-monitoring-report/
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. 2000. Teaching. Geneva: International Bureau of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, A. 2005. “Action Research: An Evolving Paradigm?” Language Teaching 38: 57–74. doi:10.1017/S0261444805002661.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, A. 2009. “Action Research in Second Language Teacher Education.” In The Cambridge Guide to Research in Language Teaching and Learning, edited by A. Burns and J.C. Richards, 289–297. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, M., and J. West-Burnham. 2005. Personalizing Learning: Transforming Education For Every Child. London: Network Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S.L. Lytle. 2009. Inquiry as a Stance. Practitioner Research for the Next Generation. New York & London: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford-Garrett, K., S. Anderson, A. Grayson, and C. Suter. 2015. “Transformational Practice: Critical Teacher Research in Pre-Service Teacher Education.” Educational Action Research 23 (4): 479–496. doi:10.1080/09650792.2015.1019902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dana, N.F., D. Yendol-Hoppey, and J.L. Snow-Gerono. 2006. “Deconstructing Inquiry in the Professional Development School.” Action in Teacher Education 27 (4): 59–71. doi:10.1080/01626620.2006.10463402.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 1991. Action Research for Educational Change. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Entwicklungsverbund Süd-Ost 2016. Curriculum Für Das Bachelorstudium Im Bereich Der Primarstufe. Graz: Pädagogische Hochschule Graz.
   Google Scholar
• Fichten, W. 2010. “Konzepte Und Wirkungen Forschungsorientierter Lehrerbildung.” In Wirkt Lehrerbildung? Antworten Aus Der Empirischen Forschung, edited by J. Abel and G. Faust, 271–281. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Fichten, W., and H. Meyer. 2014. “Skizze Einer Theorie Forschenden Lernens in Der Lehrer_Innenbildung.” In Last Oder Lust? Forschung Und Lehrer_Innenbildung, edited by E. Feyerer, K. Hirschenhauser, and K. Soukup-Altrichter, 11–42. Bad Heilbrunn: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Fichten, W. 2017. “Forschendes Lernen in Der Lehramtsausbildung.” In Forschendes Lernen, edited by H. Mieg and J. Lehmann, 155–164. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M. 2001. Taking Education Seriously. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Futter, K. 2017. Lernwirksame Unterrichtsbesprechungen Im Praktikum. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, L.H., and K.-C. Loh. 2013. “Let Them Fish”: Empowering Student-Teachers for Professional Development through the Project Approach.” Educational Action Research 21 (2): 202–217. doi:10.1080/09650792.2013.789725.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2011. Visible Learning for Teachers. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, M., and A. Jenkins. 2009. Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry. York: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Heissenberger, K. 2016. “Personalisierte Professionalsierung Durch Praxisforschung Im Praktikum.” Erziehung & Unterricht 5–6: 464–472.
   Google Scholar
• Heissenberger, K., S. Reissner, and G. Kernbichler. 2018. “Professionalisierung Von Lehramtsstudierenden Durch Praxisforschung Im Praktikum.” Forschungsperspektiven 10: 65–82.
   Google Scholar
• Helmke, A. 2012. Unterrichtsqualität Und Lehrerprofessionalität. 4th ed. Seelze: Klett-Kallmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschulgesetz. “Rechtsinformationssystem Des Bundes: RIS.” 2005. Accessed 8 October 2018 https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20004626
   Google Scholar
• Jank, W., and H. Meyer. 2011. Didaktische Modelle. 10th ed. Berlin: Cornelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Katsarou, E., and V. Tsafos. 2013. “Student-Teachers as Researchers: Towards a Professional Development Orientation in Teacher Education. Possibilities and Limitations in the Greek University.” Educational Action Research 21 (4): 532–548. doi:10.1080/09650792.2013.851611.
   Google Scholar
• Keller-Schneider, M. 2017. “Die Bedeutung Von Lerntheoretischen Überzeugungen Für Die Wahrnehmung Von Beruflichen Anforderungen Von Angehenden Lehrpersonen.” In Konzeptionelle Perspektiven Schulpraktischer Studien, edited by U. Fraefel and A. Seel, 195–212. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Kotsopoulos, D., J. Mueller, and D. Buzza. 2012. “Pre-Service Teacher Research: An Early Acculturation into a Research Disposition.” Journal of Education and Teaching 38 (1): 21–36. doi:10.1080/02607476.2012.643653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, U. 2014. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. 2nd ed. Weinheim & Basel: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. 2013. “To Know Is Not Enough: Research Knowledge and Its Use.” Review of Education 1 (1): 2–31. doi:10.1002/rev3.3001.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B., and T. Rock. 2003. “The Effects of Collaborative Action Research on Preservice and Inservice Teacher Partners in Professional Development School.” Journal of Teacher Education 54: 135–149. doi:10.1177/0022487102250287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matischek-Jauk, M., K. Heissenberger, G. Kernbichler, S. Reissner, and C. Obrecht. 2017. “Teacher Professionalization Trough Practitioner Research: Students´ Motives for Choosing Subjective Relevant Topics and Research Methods.” Poster, CARN Conference 2017, Rethymno: Greece - Reflecting on Action Research in an unequal world: an alternative perspective towards democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Mc Quillan, P., M.J. Welch, and J. Barnatt. 2012. “In Search of Coherence: “Inquiring” at Multiple Levels of Teacher Education System.” Educational Action Research 20 (4): 535–551. doi:10.1080/09650792.2012.727640.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. 2003. “Skizze Eines Stufenmodells Zur Analyse Von Forschungskompetenz.” In Forschendes Lernen. Theorie Und Praxis Einer Professionellen LehrerInnenausbildung, edited by A. Obolenski and H. Meyer, 99–116. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. 2016. Was Ist Guter Unterricht? 11th ed. Berlin: Cornelsen Scriptor.
   Google Scholar
• Mieg, H. 2017. “Forschendes Lernen - Erste Bilanz.” In Forschendes Lernen, edited by H.A. Mieg and J. Lehmann, 15–36. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005. “Developing Teachers´ Knowledge and Skills. Pointers for Policy Development.” Accessed 6 June 2019. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/45399491.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2014. “A Teachers´Guide to TALIS 2013: Teaching and Learning International Survey.” Accessed 6 June 2019. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/TALIS-Teachers-Guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. Supporting Teacher Professionalism: Insights from TALIS 2013. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession. G. Sonia Edited by. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. “The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030.” OECD Education 2030. Accessed 8 October 2018 http://www.oecd.org/general/searchresults/?q=futureofeducation&cx=012432601748511391518:xzeadub0b0a&cof=FORID:11¡UTF-8
   Google Scholar
• Rauch, F., S. Zehetemeier, and W. Erlacher. 2014. “Thirty Years of Educational Reform through Action Research: Traces in the Austrian School System.” In Action Research, Innovation and Change, edited by T. Stern, A. Townsend, F. Rauch, and A. Schuster, 27–42. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, T.G., D.C. Young, and W.L. Kraglund-Gauthier. 2017. “Action Research within Pre-Service Teacher Education.” Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal 10 (3): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Salerno, A.S., and A.K. Kibler. 2015. “Questions They Ask: Considering Teacher-Inquiry Questions Posed by Pre-Service English Teachers.” Educational Action Research 23 (3): 399–415. doi:10.1080/09650792.2015.1012174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. London: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schratz, M., and T. Westfall-Greiter. 2010. “Das Dilemma Der Individualsierungsdidaktik. Plädoyer Für Personalisiertes Lernen in Der Schule.” Journal Für Schulentwicklung 10 (1): 18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., and O. Sela. 2005. “Action Research as a Bridge between Pre-Service Teacher Education and In-Service Professional Development for Students and Teacher Educators.” European Journal of Teacher Education 28 (3): 293–310. doi:10.1080/02619760500269418.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. 1975. An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Ulvik, M. 2014. “Student-Teachers Doing Action Research in Their Practicum: Why and How?” Educational Action Research 22 (4): 518–533. doi:10.1080/09650792.2014.918901.
   Google Scholar
• Ulvik, M., H. Riese, and D. Roness. 2017. “Action Research-Connecting Practice and Theory.” Educational Action Research 26 (2): 273–287. doi:10.1080/09650792.2017.1323657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenergren, A.-C. 2016. “Teachers as Learners - with Al Little Help from a Crictical Friend.” Educational Action Research 24 (2): 260–279. doi:10.1080/09650792.2015.1058170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., E. Hepple, D. Tangen, M. Comelli, A. Alwi, and Z.A. Hassan Shaari. 2015. “An Introduction to Education Research Methods: Exploring the Learning Journey of Pre-Service Teachers in a Transnational Programme.” Asia-Pazific Journal of Teacher Education44 (1): 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, C. 2017. “From Teaching to Learning” - Merkmale Und Herausforderungen Einer Studierendenzentrierten Lernkultur.” In Forschendes Lernen, edited by H.A. Mieg and J. Lehmann, 66–78. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, C. 2017. “‘You Never Know What Research Is unless You’ve Done Ist!’ Action Research to Promote Collaborative Student-Teacher Research.” Educational Action Research 25 (5): 704–719. doi:10.1080/09650792.2016.1245155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehetmeier, S., I. Andreitz, W. Erlacher, and F. Rauch. 2015. “Researching the Impact of Teacher Professional Development Programmes Based on Action Research, Constructivism and System Theory.” Educational Action Research 23 (2): 162–177. doi:10.1080/09650792.2014.997261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K.M. 2001. “Educational Action Research.” In Educational Action Research, edited by V.P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 273–283. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K.M. 2003. “Teacher Research as Professional Development for P-12 Educators in the USA.” Educational Action Research 11 (2): 301–326. doi:10.1080/09650790300200211.
   Google Scholar