Fostering innovation through collaborative action research on the creation of shared instructional products by university science instructors

References

• Argyris, C., and D. Schon. 1996. Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Atman, C., R. Adams, M. Cardella, J. Turns, S. Mosborg, and J. Saleem. 2007. “Engineering Design Processes: a Comparison Of Students and Expert Practitioners.” Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359–379. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, C., T. Flynn, and S. Stagg-Peterson. 2011. “Examining What We Mean by Collaboration in Collaborative Action Research: A Cross-case Analysis.” Educational Action Research 19 (4): 433–452. doi:10.1080/09650792.2011.625667.
   Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, L. 1994. Designing Engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capobianco, B., J. De Lisi, and J. Radloff. 2018. “Characterizing Elementary Teachers’ Enactment Of High Leverage Practices Through Engineering Design-based Science Instruction.” Science Education, 102(2), 342–376. doi:10.1002/sce.21325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capobianco, B.M. 2002. “Making Science Accessible through Collaborative Science Teacher Action Research on Feminist Pedagogy.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Capobianco, B.M. 2007. “Science Teachers’ Attempts at Integrating Feminist Pedagogy through Collaborative Action Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (1): 1–32. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capobianco, B.M. 2011. “Exploring a Science Teacher’s Uncertainty with Integrating Engineering Design: An Action Research Study.” Journal of Elementary Science Education 22 (7): 645–660.
   Google Scholar
• Capobianco, B.M., and A. Feldman. 2006. “Promoting Quality for Teacher Action Research: Lessons Learned from Science Teachers’ Action Research.” Educational Action Research 14 (4): 497–512. doi:10.1080/09650790600975668.
   Google Scholar
• Capobianco, B.M., and J. Radloff (2018, October). “Exploring the Influence of Action Research on the Creation and Use of Shared Instructional Products by University Science Faculty.” A paper presentation at the annual meeting for the Collaborative Action Research Network, Manchester, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Capobianco, B.M., and M.N. Ríordáin. 2015. “Navigating Layers of Teacher Uncertainty among Pre-service Science and Mathematics Teachers Engaged in Action Research.” Educational Action Research 23 (4): 581–598. doi:10.1080/09650792.2015.1045537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., and D. Miller. 2000. “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry.” Theory into Practice 39 (3): 124–130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, A. 1999. “The Role of Conversation in Collaborative Action Research.” Educational Action Research 7 (1): 125–147. doi:10.1080/09650799900200076.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, A., H. Altrichter, P. Posch, and B. Somekh. 2018. Teachers Investigate Their Work: An Introduction to Action Research across Professions. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnough, K. 2011. “Examining the Long‐term Impact of Collaborative Action Research on Teacher Identity and Practice: The Perceptions of K–12 Teachers.” Educational Action Research 19 (1): 73–86. doi:10.1080/09650792.2011.547694.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, J. E., D. F. Radcliffe, and D. Schoorl. 1985. “Design or Problem Solving-a Critical Choice for The Engineering Profession.” Design Studies, 6(2), 107–110. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(85)90020-1
   Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, R., J. Flanagan, and B. Wigley. 2016. “A New Model of Collaborative Action Research; Theorizing from Inter-professional Practice Development.” Educational Action Research 24 (4): 519–534. doi:10.1080/09650792.2015.1110038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, R., and U. Thomas. 2017. “Concerning Collaboration: Teachers’ Perspectives on Working in Partnerships to Develop Teaching Practices.” Professional Development in Education 43 (1): 36–56. doi:10.1080/19415257.2015.1053570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., and A. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, M.A., and T.A. Laubach. 2002 July . “Adventure Engineering: A Design Centered, Inquiry Based Approach to Middle Grade Science and Mathematics Education”. Journal of Engineering Education .309–318. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00708.x
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A.K., and J. Hiebert. 2011. “Creating Shared Instructional Products: An Alternative Approach to Improving Teaching.” Educational Researcher 40 (1): 5–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X10393501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nevin, A.I., J.S. Thousand, and R.A. Villa. 2009. “Collaborative Teaching for Teacher Educators: What Does the Research Say?” Teaching and Teacher Education 25: 569–574. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Next Generation Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedrosa-de-Jesus, H., C. Guerra, and M. Watts. 2017. “University teachers’ self-reflection on their academic growth.” Professional Development in Education 43 (3): 454–473. doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1194877
   Google Scholar
• Pugach, M.C., and L.P. Blanton. 2009. “A Framework for Conducting Research on Collaborative Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25: 575–582. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radloff, J., S. Guzey, D. Eichinger, and B. Capobianco. Forthcoming. “Integrating Engineering Design in Undergraduate Biology Using a Life Science Design Task.” Journal of College Science Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Rogan, A., and C. Aldous. 2005. “Relationships between Constructs of a Theory of Curriculum Implementation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (3): 313–336. doi:10.1002/tea.20054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogan, J., and D. Grayson. 2002. “Towards a Theory of Curriculum Implementation with Particular Reference to Science Education in Developing Countries.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (10): 1171–1204. doi:10.1080/09500690210145819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J., C. Rolheiser, and A. Hogaboam-Gray. 1999. “Effects of Collaborative Action Research on the Knowledge of Five Canadian Teacher-researchers.” The Elementary School Journal 99 (3): 255–274. doi:10.1086/461926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagor, R. 1992. How to Conduct Collaborative Action Research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. 2015. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B., and K. Zeichner. 2009. “Action Research for Educational Reform: Remodeling Action Research Theories and Practices in Local Contexts.” Educational Action Research 17 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1080/09650790802667402.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. 1975. An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., L. Puchner, M. Powell, V. Harris, and R. Marshall. 2012. “Reconceiving with Action Research: Working within and across Communities of Practice in a University/community College Collaborative Venture.” Educational Action Research 20 (3): 333–351. doi:10.1080/09650792.2012.697390.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., J. Thompson, M. Braaten, and D. Stroupe. 2012. “Proposing a Core Set of Instructional Practices and Tools for Teachers of Science.” Science Education 96: 878–903. doi:10.1002/sce.v96.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar