Visible mathematics pedagogy: A model for transforming classroom practice

References

• Atweh, B. 2004. “Understanding for Change and Changing for Understanding: Praxis between Practice and Theory through Action Research in Mathematics Education.” In Researching the Socio-political Dimensions of Mathematics Education, edited by P. Valero and R. Zevenbergen, pp. 187–205. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique (Revised Ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, A.J. 1998. “Research, Effectiveness, and the Practitioners’ World.” In Mathematics Education as A Research Domain: A Search for Identity, edited by A. Sierpinska and J. Kilpatrick, pp. 33–45. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. 2008. “Promoting ‘Relational Equity’ and High Mathematics Achievement through an Innovative Mixed-ability Approach.” British Educational Research Journal 34 (2): 167–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701532145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. 2009. The Elephant in the Classroom: Helping Children Learn and Love Maths. London: Souvenir Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., L. Altendorf, and G. Kent. 2011. “Mathematics and Science Inequalities in the United Kingdom: When Elitism, Sexism and Culture Collide.” Oxford Review of Education 37 (4): 457–484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.595551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and J.-C. Passeron. 1990. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. 2nd ed ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boylan, M., M. Coldwell, B. Maxwell, and J. Jordan. 2018. “Rethinking Models of Professional Learning as Tools: A Conceptual Analysis to Inform Research and Practice.” Professional Development in Education 44 (1): 120–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1306789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, H., and B. Burstow. 2018. “Understanding Ethics in School-based Research.” Professional Development in Education 44 (1): 107–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1361464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller, M., D. Greenwood, and P. Maguire. 2003. “Why Action Research?” Action Research 1 (1): 9–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030011002.
   Google Scholar
• Brydon‐Miller, M., and P. Maguire. 2009. “Participatory Action Research: Contributions to the Development of Practitioner Inquiry in Education.” Educational Action Research 16 (1): 79–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802667469.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 2009. “Educational Action Research: A Critical Approach.” In The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by S. Noffke and B. Somekh, pp. 74–84. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., and H. Hollingsworth. 2002. “Elaborating a Model of Teacher Professional Growth.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (8): 947–967. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. Lytle. 2009. “Teacher Research as Stance.” In The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by S. Noffke and B. Somekh, pp. 39–49. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, A. 2013. “Using Video for Professional Development: The Role of the Discussion Facilitator.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 16 (3): 165–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9225-0.
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley, P. 2013. The Contribution of Research to Teachers’ Professional Learning and Development. London: Research and teacher education: BERA-RSA Inquiry.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 2009. “Building Educational Theory through Action Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by S. Noffke and B. Somekh, pp. 28–38. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 2019. “What Is Lesson Study? European Journal of Education Research.” Development and Polciy 54 (2): 175–188.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. 1991. The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. 2016. “The Scope and Limits of Critical Mathematics Education.” In Critical Mathematics Education: Theory, Practice and Reality, edited by P. Ernest, B. Sriraman, and N. Ernest, 99–126. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P., and B. Sriraman. 2016. “Foreword.” In Critical Mathematics Education: Theory, Practice and Reality, edited by P. Ernest, B. Sriraman, and N. Ernest, vii–xi. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane. 2006. “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1): 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, A., and J.H. Frey. 2008. “The Interview: From Neutral Stance to Political Involvement.” In Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, edited by N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 115–159. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, C. 2013. “Resisting Reductionism in Mathematics Pedagogy.” The Curriculum Journal 24 (4): 565–585. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.828630.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, C. 2018. “Developing Mathematical Fluency: Comparing Exercises and Rich Tasks.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 97 (2): 121–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9788-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, V., T. Muir, and J. Lamb. 2016. “Video-stimulated Recall as a Catalyst for Teacher Professional Learning.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 19 (5): 457–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9306-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, W.J., and A. Brown. 2009. Working with Qualitative Data. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grootenboer, P. 2013. “The Praxis of Mathematics Teaching: Developing Mathematical Identities.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 21 (2): 321–342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.759131.
   Google Scholar
• Gutstein, E. 2006. Reading and Writing the World with Mathematics: Toward a Pedagogy for Social Justice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. 2004. “Some Questions about Evidence-based Practice in Education.” In Evidence-based Practice in Education, edited by G. Thomas and R. Pring, 133–149. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, V. 2012. “Seeing Culture and Power in Mathematical Learning: Toward a Model of Equitable Instruction.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 80 (1/2): 233–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9387-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, H., and D. Clarke. 2017. “Video as a Tool for Focusing Teacher Self-reflection: Supporting and Provoking Teacher Learning.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 20 (5): 457–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-017-9380-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. 2018. “Powerful Knowledge and Epistemic Quality in School Mathematics.” London Review of Education 16 (3): 384–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imants, J., and M. Van der Wal. 2020. “A Model of Teacher Agency in Professional Development and School Reform.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 52 (1): 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1604809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B. 2006. “Theory and Practice in Mathematics Teaching Development: Critical Inquiry as a Mode of Learning in Teaching.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 9 (2): 187–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-1223-z.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, R. 2016. “The Elephant in the Room: Equity, Social Class, and Mathematics.” In Critical Mathematics Education: Theory, Practice and Reality, edited by P. Ernest, B. Sriraman, and N. Ernest, 127–146. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., and S. Brinkmann. 2009. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Leat, D., R. Lofthouse, and A. Reid. 2014. Teachers’ Views: Perspectives on Research Engagement. London: Research and Teacher Education: BERA-RSA Inquiry.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., R. Perry, and S. Friedkin. 2009. “Lesson Study as Action Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by S. Noffke and B. Somekh, pp. 142–154. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y.S., and E.G. Guba. 2003. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences.” In The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues, edited by N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, pp. 253–291. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, K. 2015. “Critical Reflection as a Framework for Transformative Learning in Teacher Education.” Educational Review 67 (2): 135–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.839546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, S.T. 2004. “Decoding Mathematics Instruction: A Critical Examination of an Invisible Pedagogy.” In Reading Bernstein, Researching Bernstein, edited by J. Muller, B. Davies, and A. Morais, pp. 91–122. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. 2015. “A Self-improving System.” Research Intelligence 126: 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, E., and S. Steward. 2003. “Is Mathematics T.I.R.E.D.? A Profile of Quiet Disaffection in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom.” British Educational Research Journal 29 (3): 345–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920301852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noffke, S. 2009. “Revisiting the Professional, Personal, and Political Dimensions of Action Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by S. Noffke and B. Somekh, pp. 6–23. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, A. 2008. “Mathematical Marginalisation and Meritocracy: Inequity in an English Classroom.” In International Perspectives on Social Justice in Mathematics Education, edited by B. Sriraman, pp. 51–68. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, A. 2009. “Exploring Social Patterns of Participation in University-entrance Level Mathematics in England.” Research in Mathematics Education 11 (2): 167–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800903063356.
   Google Scholar
• Robutti, O., A. Cusi, A. Clark-Wilson, B. Jaworski, O. Chapman, C. Esteley, M. Joubert, M. Isoda, and M. Joubert. 2016. “ICME International Survey on Teachers Working and Learning through Collaboratiion: June 2016.” ZDM Mathematics Education 48 (5): 651–690. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0797-5.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M., and E. Dyer. 2017. “Mathematics Teachers’ Self-captured Video and Opportunities for Learning.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 20 (5): 477–495. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-017-9383-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skemp, R. 1972. The Psychology of Learning Mathematics. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, O. 2011. An Invitation to Critical Mathematics Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsmose, O., and M. Borba. 2004. “Research Methodology and Critical Mathematics Education.” In Researching the Socio-political Dimensions of Mathematics Education, edited by P. Valero and R. Zevenbergen, pp. 207–226. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., V. Lee, and F. Newmann. 2001. Instruction and Achievement in Chicago Schools. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Straehler-Pohl, H., and U. Gellert. 2013. “Towards a Bernsteinian Language of Description for Mathematics Classroom Discourse.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 34 (3): 313–332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2012.714250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, M. 2006. Collaborative Learning in Mathematics: A Challenge to Our Beliefs and Practices. Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, A., and T. McDougal. 2016. “Collaborative Lesson Research: Maximizing the Impact of Lesson Study.” ZDM Mathematics Education 48 (4): 513–526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0752-x.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. 2004. “Introduction: Evidence and Practice.” In Evidence-based Practice in Education, edited by G. Thomas and R. Pring, pp. 1–18. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., and H. Gunter. 2009. “Students’ Participation Ins School Change: Action Research on the Ground.” In The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by S. Noffke and B. Somekh, 409–419. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Valero, P. 2004. “Socio-political Perspectives on Mathematics Education.” In Researching the Socio-political Dimensions of Mathematics Education, edited by P. Valero and R. Zevenbergen, 5–23. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wake, G., M. Swan, and C. Foster. 2016. “Professional Learning through the Collaborative Design of Problem-solving Lessons.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 19 (2–3): 243–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9332-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J., and S. Choudhury. 2016. “Mathematics Capital in the Educational Field: Beyond Bourdieu.” Research in Mathematics Education 18 (1): 3–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2016.1141113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, C., A. Oancea, and J. Orchard. 2013. The Contribution of Educational Research to Teachers’ Professional Learning - Philosophical Understandings. London: Research and Teacher Education: The BERA-RSA Inquiry.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P. 2016. “Social Justice in the Mathematics Classroom.” London Review of Education 14 (2): 104–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.14.2.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. 2017. “Critical Relationships between Teachers and Learners of School Mathematics.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 25 (4): 515–530. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2017.1285345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. 2019. “Visible Pedagogy and Challenging Inequity Is School Mathematics.” Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 11). Utrecht: European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P. 2020. “Visible and Socially-just Pedagogy: Implications for Mathematics Teacher Education.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 52 (6): 733–751. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1790667.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P., A. Fejzo, and T. Carvalho. 2020. “Challenging Inequity in Mathematics Education by Making Pedagogy More Visible to Learners.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1775320.
   Google Scholar
• Wyse, D., C. Brown, S. Oliver, and X. Poblete. 2018. The BERA Close-to-Practice Research Project: Research Report. London: British Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar