Building leadership capacity in school leadership groups: an action research project

References

• Aas, M. 2014. “Towards a Reflection Repertoire: Using a Thinking Tool to Understand Tensions in an Action Research Project.” Educational Action Research 22 (3): 441–454. doi:10.1080/09650792.2013.872572.
   Google Scholar
• Aas, M. 2017a. “Leaders as Learners: Developing New Leadership Practices.” Professional Development in Education 43 (3): 439–453. doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1194878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aas, M. 2017b. “Understanding Leadership and Change in Schools: Expansive Learning and Tensions.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 20 (3): 278–296. doi:10.1080/13603124.2015.1082630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aas, M., and B. Fluckiger. 2016. “The Role of a Group Coach in the Professional Learning of School Leaders.” Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice 9 (1): 38–52. doi:10.1080/17521882.2016.1143022.
   Google Scholar
• Aas, M., and J.M. Paulsen. 2019. “National Strategy for Supporting School Principal’s Instructional Leadership. A Scandinavian Approach.” Journal of Educational Administration 57 (5): 540–553. doi:10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aas, M., and M. Vavik. 2015. “Group Coaching: A New Way of Constructing Leadership Identity?” School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organisation 35 (3): 251–265. doi:10.1080/13632434.2014.962497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aas, M., K.F. Vennebo, and K.A. Halvorsen. 2019. “Benchlearning – An Action Research Program for Transforming Leadership and School Practices.” Educational Action Research 28 (2): 210–226. doi:10.1080/09650792.2019.1566084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandmo, C., M. Aas, T. Colbjørnsen, and R. Olsen. 2019. “Group Coaching that Promotes Self-Efficacy and Role Clarity among School Leaders.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00313831.2019.1659406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, J.J. 2010. Effective Group Coaching. Tried and Tested Tools and Resources for Optimum Coaching Results. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Son.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.W., and A.M. Grant. 2010. “From GROW to GROUP: Theoretical Issues and a Practical Model for Group Coaching in Organisations.” Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice 3 (1): 30–45. doi:10.1080/17521880903559697.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, T. 2018. “Transformational Leadership: Exploring Common Conceptions.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 46 (6): 883–887. doi:10.1177/1741143218795731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, S. 2011. “Learning in Activity: Exploring the Methodological Potential of Action Research in Activity Theorising of Social Practice.” Educational Action Research 19 (2): 215–229. doi:10.1080/09650792.2011.569230.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster, N., S. Lovett, and B. Fluckiger. 2011. “Literature Review: Strategies to Develop School Leadership.”  Melbourne: AITSL.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1966. Democracy and Education (1916). New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., and R.J. Marzano. 2011. Leaders of Learning: How District, School, and Classroom Leaders Improve Student Achievement. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y. 2000. “Activity Theory and the Social Construction of Knowledge: A Story of Four Umpires.” Organization 7 (2): 301–310. doi:10.1177/135050840072006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1987. “Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research.” PhD diss., University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2001. “Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization.” Journal of Education and Work 14 (1): 133–156. doi:10.1080/13639080020028747.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., and A. Sannino. 2010. “Studies of Expansive Learning: Foundations, Findings and Future Challenges.” Educational Research Review 5 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluckiger, B., S. Lovett, and N. Dempster. 2014. “Judging the Quality of School Leadership Learning Programmes: An International Search.” Professional Development in Education 40 (5): 561–575. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.902861.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, K.A. 2001. “Cultural-Historical Activity Theory as Practical Theory: Illuminating the Development of a Conflict Monitoring Network.” Communication Theory 11 (1): 56–83. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00233.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2014. The Principal. Three Keys to Maximizing Impact. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2015. The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2018. Surreal Change: The Real Life of Transforming Public Education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1987. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Translated and edited by T. McCarthy, Vol. 2. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., and M.T. O’Connor. 2018. Collaborative Professionalism. When Teaching Together Means Learning for All. Boston: Emerald Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., and D.T. Shirley. 2012. The Global Fourth Way: The Quest for Educational Excellence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., and M. Jones. 2019. “Leading Professional Learning with Impact.” School Leadership & Management 39 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1080/13632434.2018.1530892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, Ø.H., and M. Aas. 2020. “Enhancing System Thinking – A Superintendent and Three Principals Reflecting with A Critical Friend” Educational Action Research Advance online publication. 1–16. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2020.1724813.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, S.G. 2011. “Leadership for Learning – Learning for Leadership: The Impact of Professional Development.” In Springer International Handbook of Leadership for Learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education, edited by T. Townsend and J. MacBeath, 635–652. Vol. 25. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. 2009. “Action Research as a Practice-Based Practice.” Educational Action Research 17 (3): 463–474. doi:10.1080/09650790903093284.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and P. Grootenboer. 2008. “Situating Praxis in Practice: Practice Architectures and the Cultural, Social and Material Conditions for Practice.” In Enabling Praxis: Challenges for Education, edited by P.S.P. Salo and S. Kemmis, 37–64, Rotterdam: Sence Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., R. McTaggart, and R. Nixon. 2014. The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., R. McTaggart, and R. Nixon. 2019. “Critical Participatory Action Research.” In Action Learning and Action Research: Genres and Approaches, edited by O. Zuber-Skerritt and L. Wood, 179–192, Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., J. Wilkinson, and C. Edwards-Groves. 2017. “Roads Not Travelled, Roads Ahead: How the Theory of Practice Architectures Is Travelling.” In Exploring Education and Professional Practice, edited by K. Mahon, S. Francisco, and S. Kemmis, 239–256. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kovačević, J., and P. Hallinger. 2019. “Leading School Change and Improvement.” Journal of Educational Administration 57 (6): 635–657. doi:10.1108/JEA-02-2019-0018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., and K.S. Louis. 2012. Linking Leadership to Student Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., J. Sun, and K. Pollock. 2017. How School Leaders Contribute to Student Success: The Four Paths Framework. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K., and D. Cartwright. 1951. Field Theory in Social Science Selected Theoretical Papers. New York: Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y.S., and E.G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mulford, B., and H. Silins. 2003. “Leadership for Organizational Learning and Improved Student Outcomes – What Do We Know?” Cambridge Journal of Education 33 (2): 175–195. doi:10.1080/03057640302041.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Leadership for 21st Century Learning, Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Puentedura, R.R. 2013. “SAMR: Moving from Enhancement to Transformation” Web blog post, May 29. http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/000095.html
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., and H. Bradbury. 2006. Handbook of Action Research: The Concise Paperback Edition. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, L. 2014. Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. 2013. “Learning Leadership.” Leading and Managing 19 (2): 54–69.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., and Y.-J. Lee. 2006. “Contradictions in Theorizing and Implementing Communities in Education.” Educational Research Review 1 (1): 27–40. doi:10.3102/0034654306298273.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T.R. 2006. “On Organizations as They Happen.” Organization Studies 27 (12): 1863–1873. doi:10.1177/0170840606071942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiser, A.F. 2019. “Exploring Enhanced Pedagogical Leadership: An Action Research Study Involving Swedish Principals.” Educational Action Research Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09650792.2019.1656661.
   Google Scholar
• Skoglund, K.N. 2020. “Social Interaction of Leaders in Partnerships between Schools and Universities: Tensions as Support and Counterbalance” International Journal of Leadership in Education Advance online publication. 1–20. doi: 10.1080/13603124.2020.1797178.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B., and K. Zeichner. 2009. “Action Research for Educational Reform: Remodelling Action Research Theories and Practices in Local Contexts.” Educational Action Research 17 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1080/09650790802667402.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., R. Bolam, A. McMahon, M. Wallace, and S. Thomas. 2006. “Professional Learning Communities: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Educational Change 7 (4): 221–258. doi:10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., and K.S. Louis. 2007. Professional Learning Communities: Divergence, Depth and Dilemmas. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S. 2004. “Critical Friends: Supporting Leadership,” Improving Learning.  7 (3): 267–278.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., A. Wilson, H. Barrar, and I. Fung. 2007. Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. http://educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz/goto/BES
   Google Scholar
• Vennebo, K.F. 2015. “School Leadership and Innovative Work. Places and Spaces.” PhD diss., University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Vennebo, K.F. 2016. “Innovative Work in School Development: Exploring Leadership Enactment.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45 (2): 298–315. doi:10.1177/1741143215617944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar