The good fight: action research as resistance

References

• Anderson, G. L., and K. Herr. 1999. “The New Paradigm Wars: Is There Room for Rigorous Practitioner Knowledge in Schools and Universities?” Educational Researcher 28 (5): 12–40. doi:10.3102/0013189X028005012.
   Google Scholar
• Bakerson, M. A., M. L. Heck, and G Mett, et al. 2015. “When Imagining “What If” Is Problematic: Complexities of IRB Teacher Research Approval.” International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies 10 (1): 1–12. https:/doi.org/10.18848/2327-011X/CGP/v10i01/53269.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, L., and M. Volpe. 2019. Completing Your Qualitative Dissertation: A Road Map from Beginning to End. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. 2010. “Teacher Research and University Institutional Review Boards.” Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 31 (3): 276–283. doi:10.1080/10901027.2010.500559.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, S., K. Crenshaw, and L. McCall. 2013. “Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis.” Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38 (4): 785–810. doi:10.1086/669608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Anti-discrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Anti-racist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1): 139–167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf. Accessed on 11 July 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dana, N. F. 2015. “Understanding Inquiry as Stance: Illustration and Analysis of One Teacher Researcher’s Work.” LEARNing Landscapes 8 (2): 161–171. doi:10.36510/learnland.v8i2.702.
   Google Scholar
• DeTardo-Bora, K. A. 2004. “Action Research in a World of Positivist-oriented Review Boards.” Action Research 2 (3): 237–253. doi:10.1177/1476750304045938.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, S., and R. Ravid. 2013. Action Research in Education: A Practical Guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feucht, F. C., J. Lunn Brownlee, and G. Schraw. 2017. “Moving beyond Reflection: Reflexivity and Epistemic Cognition in Teaching and Teacher Education.” Educational Psychologist 52 (4): 234–241. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1350180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouché, C. B., and L. A. Chubb. 2017. “Action Researchers Encountering Ethical Review: A Literature Synthesis on Challenges and Strategies.” Educational Action Research 25 (1): 23–34. doi:10.1080/09650792.2015.1128956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii, L. A. 2015. “Five Stories of Accidental Ethnography: Turning Unplanned Moments in the Field into Data.” Qualitative Research 15 (4): 525–539. doi:10.1177/1468794114548945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulmer, E., and J. Bodner. 2017. “Detached and Unsustainable: Central Tensions in Teacher Research Capstones and the Possibilities for Reimagined Inquiry.” I.E.: Inquiry in Education 9 (2): 1–15. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1171756. Accessed on 1 September 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Garte, R. 2017. “American Progressive Education and the Schooling of Poor Children: A Brief History of A Philosophy in Practice.” International Journal of Progressive Education 13 (2): 7–17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1145585. Accessed on 1 September 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Gelling, L., and C. Munn-Giddings. 2011. “Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees.” Research Ethics 7 (3): 100–106. doi:10.1177/174701611100700305.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, K., and G. Anderson. 2015. The Action Research Dissertation: A Guide for Students and Faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsler, K. 2010. “The Utility of Educational Action Research for Emancipatory Change.” Action Research 8 (2): 171–189. doi:10.1177/1476750309351357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuriloff, P. J., S. H. Andrus, and S. M. Ravitch. 2011. “Messy Ethics: Conducting Moral Participatory Action Research in the Crucible of University-school Relations.” Mind, Brain & Education 5 (2): 49–62. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01110.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. 2013. “Critical Race Theory—what It Is Not!” In Handbook of Critical Race Theory in Education, edited by M. Lynn and A. D. Dixson, 34–47, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, D., and J. Wendland. 2018. “Practical, Epistemological, and Ethical Challenges of Participatory Action Research: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement 22 (3): 11–42. https://ahrecs.com/resource/practical-epistemological-and-ethical-challenges-of-participatory-action-research-a-cross-disciplinary-review-of-the-literature-papers-danielle-lake-and-joel-wendland-2018/. Accessed on 1 August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Levitan, J., D. Carr-Chellman, and A. Carr-Chellman. 2020. “Accidental Ethnography: A Method for Practitioner-based Education Research.” Action Research 18 (3): 336–352. doi:10.1177/1476750317709078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttenberg, J., P. Meijer, and H. Oolbekkink-Marchand. 2016. “Understanding the Complexity of Teacher Reflection in Action Research.” Educational Action Research 25 (1): 88–102. doi:10.1080/09650792.2015.1136230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, M., and A. Dixson. 2013. The Handbook of Critical Race Theory in Education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. (2020). Lifting the veil: A critical post-intentional phenomenological action research study of how African American students experience science [ Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina]. Scholar Commons. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/6058. Accessed on 1 August 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S., and E. Tisdell. 2016. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Vancouver, BC: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery County Public Schools. 2016. Regulation for Research and Other Data Collection Activities (Rockville, MD). MCPS AFA-RA.
   Google Scholar
• Nolen, A. L., and J. V. Putten. 2007. “Action Research in Education: Addressing Gaps in Ethical Principles and Practices.” Educational Researcher 36 (7): 401–407. doi:10.3102/0013189X07309629.
   Google Scholar
• Pine, G. J. 2009. Teacher Action Research: Building Knowledge Democracies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda, R., M. Sundt, and L. O. Picus. 2013. “Developing Scholarly Practitioners: Lessons from a Decade-long Experiment.” Planning and Changing 44 (3/4): 252–265. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1145925.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, F. O., and E. Meyers. 2003. “How We Do Action Research.” In Taking Action with Teacher Research, edited by E. Meyers and F. O. Rust, 1–16, Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Schiera, A. J. 2014. “Practitioner Research as ‘Praxidents’ Waiting to Happen.” Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education 11 (2): 107–116. https://urbanedjournal.gse.upenn.edu/archive/volume-11-issue-2-summer-2014/practitioner-research-%E2%80%9Cpraxidents%E2%80%9D-waiting-happen.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, G. 2018. “Eight Criteria for Quality in Systemic Practitioner Research.” Murmurations: Journal of Transformative Systemic Practice 1 (2): 40–62. doi:10.28963/1.2.5.
   Google Scholar
• Soule, K. E., and M. Freeman. 2019. “So You Want to Do Post-intentional Phenomenological Research?” The Qualitative Report 24 (4): 857–872. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol24/iss4/15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledano, N., and A. R. Anderson. 2020. “Theoretical Reflection on Narrative in Action Research.” Action Research 18 (3): 302–318. doi:10.1177/1476750317748439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulvik, M., H. Riese, and D. Roness. 2017. “Action Research: Connecting Practice and Theory.” Educational Action Research 26 (2): 273–287. doi:10.1080/09650792.2017.1323657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagle, M. 2018. Crafting Phenomenological Research. 2nd ed. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, G., A. Murphy, and G. Salamon. 2020. 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvmx3j22.
   Google Scholar
• Woodrow, K. E. 2020. “Challenges with External Research Reviews Shape New Practices for University Teacher Action Research Courses.” Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue 22 (1–2): 303–306.
   Google Scholar
• Yanar, Z. M., M. Fazli, J. Rahman, and R. Farthing. 2016. “Research Ethics Committees and Participatory Action Research with Young People: The Politics of Voice.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 11 (2): 122–128. doi:10.1177/1556264616650114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeni, J. 1998. “A Guide to Ethical Issues and Action Research.” Educational Action Research 6 (1): 9–19. doi:10.1080/09650799800200053.
   Google Scholar