Acknowledging, negotiating, and reporting ‘uncomfortable truths’ in action research

References

• Boyle, T., and A. Petriwskyj. 2014. “Transitions to School: Reframing Professional Relationships.” Early Years: An International Research Journal 34 (4): 392–404. doi:10.1080/09575146.2014.953042.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, T., and J. Wilkinson 2018. “Two Worlds, One Site: Leading Practices”
   Google Scholar
• Brooker, R., and I. Macpherson. 1999. “Communicating the Processes and Outcomes of Practitioner Research: An Opportunity for Self-indulgence or a Serious Professional Responsibility.” Educational Action Research 7 (2): 207–221.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 2005. “Staying Critical.” Educational Action Research 13 (3): 347–358.
   Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., and T. Brannick. 2014. Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization. 4th ed. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, C., and C. Edwards-Groves. 2019. “Managing the Delicate Matter of Advice Giving: Accomplishing Communicative Space in Critical Participatory Action Research.” Educational Action Research 28 (2): 275–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, H, and J. Moon 2013. Making Room for New Traditions: Encouraging Critical Reflective Professional Practice for Tertiary Education Management. Tertiary Education Management Conference: Trends, Traditions, Technology, Refereed Papers, Hobart, (23–33).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. 1998. “Understanding the Meanings of Children: A Reflexive Process.” Children & Society 12 (5): 325–335.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Groves, C., and C. Davidson. 2017. Becoming a Meaning Maker: Talk and Interaction in a Dialogic Classroom. Newtown: Primary English Teaching Association Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., and G. Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Assessment Sequences.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 2005. “Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the Public Sphere.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 559–604. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, H. 2001. “Power Games and Moral Territories: Ethical Dilemmas When Working with Children and Young People.” Ethics, Place and Environment 4 (2): 117–118.
   Google Scholar
• Mockler, N., and S. Groundwater-Smith. 2015. “Seeking for the Unwelcome Truths: Beyond Celebration in Inquiry-based Teacher Professional Learning.” Teachers and Teaching 21 (5): 603–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, J., and M. Aiken. 2006. Program Evaluation: Forms and Approaches. 3rd ed. New York: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. 2003. “Confession, Catharsis, or Cure? Rethinking the Uses of Reflexivity as Methodological Power in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 16 (2): 175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, F., E. Piggot Irvine, H. Howard Youngs, and P. Cady. 2019. “Struggling to Achieve Desired Results from Your AR Projects? Insights from the Evaluative Study of Action Research May Help.” Educational Action Research 27 (5): 778–797. doi:10.1080/09650792.2018.1544916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnerman, K., and A. Olin. 2021. “Practice Changing Practices: Influences of Master’s Programme Practice on School Practices.” Professional Development in Education. Published on-line. doi:10.1080/19415257.2021.1910978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotter, J., and B. Gustavsen. 1999. The Role of Dialogue Conferences in Development of “Learning Regions”: Doing from “Within Our” Lives Together What We Cannot Do Apart. Stockholm: Centre for Advanced Studies in Leadership at Stockholm School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. 2011. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Second ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar