Participatory research in institutional contexts: achieving ethical symmetry in research practice

References

• Aldridge, Jo. 2016. Participatory Research: Working with Vulnerable Groups in Research and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, Susanne. 2014. Der Letzte Umzug: Der Weg Ins Altersheim Für Pflegebedürftige Und Ihre Angehörigen [The Last Move: The Pathway to the Retirement Home for People in Need of Care and Their Relatives]. Hamburg: Diplomica.
   Google Scholar
• Arstein-Kerslake, Anna, and Eilionóir Flyn. 2017. “The Right to Legal Agency: Domination, Disability and the Protections of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” International Journal of Law in Context 13 (1): 22–38. doi:10.1017/S1744552316000458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, Sarah, and Mary Brydon-Miller. 2019. Ethics in Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being: Cases and Commentaries. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bergold, Jarg, and Stefan Thomas. 2012. “Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 13 (1). doi:10.17169/fqs-13.1.1801.
   Google Scholar
• Bröckling, Ulrich. 2016. The Entrepreneurial Self: Fabricating a New Type of Subject. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bröckling, Ulrich, and Susanne Krasmann. 2010. “Ni Méthode, Ni Approche – Zur Forschungsperspektive der Gouvernementalitätsstudien – Mit Einem Seitenblick Auf Konvergenzen Und Divergenzen Zur Diskursforschung [Neither Method nor Approach - on the Research Perspective of Governmentality Studies - with a Sideways Glance at Convergences and Divergences in Discourse Research.” In Diskursanalyse Meets Gouvernementalitätsforschung. Perspektiven Auf Das Verhältnis von Subjekt, Sprache, Macht Und Wissen [Discourse Analysis Meets Governmentality Research. Perspectives on the Relationship between Subject, Language, Power and Knowledge], edited by Johannes Angermüller and Silke van Dyk, 23–42. Frankfurt am.Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Pia, and Alan Prout. 2002. “Working with Ethical Symmetry in Social Research with Children.” Childhood 9 (4): 477–490. doi:10.1177/2F0907568202009004007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRDP). 2014. General Comment No. 1. Article 12: Equal Recognition before the Law. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and-recommendations/general-comment-no-1-article-12-equal-recognition-1. (Accessed 08 04 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Degener, Theresia. “Die UN-Behindertenrechtskonvention – Ein neues Verständnis von Behinderung [The UN Disability Rights Convention - a new understanding of disability].” In Teilhabe Als Menschenrecht – Inklusion Als Gesellschaftliche Aufgabe [Handbook of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Participation as a Human Right - Inclusion as a Social Task], edited by Handbuch der Behindertenrechtskonvention, Theresia Degener, and Elke Diehl, 55–65. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Denninger, Tina, Silke van Dyk, Stephan Lessenich, and Anna Richter. 2014. “Leben im Ruhestand – Zur Neuverhandlung des Alters in der Aktivgesellschaft.” [Life in Retirement – renegotiating Age in Active Society]. Bielefeld: transcript
   Google Scholar
• Dockett, Sue, Johanna Einarsdottir, and Bob Perry. 2011. “Balancing Methodologies and Methods in Researching with Young Children.” In Researching Young Children’s Perspectives: Debating the Ethics and Dilemmas of Educational Research with Children, edited by Deborah Harcourt, Bob Perry, and Tim Waller, 68–81. Hoboken: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Ann Mische. 1998. “What Is Agency?” The American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023. doi:10.1086/231294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eßer, Florian, and Miriam Sitter. 2018. “Ethische Symmetrie in der Partizipativen Forschung Mit Kindern [Ethical Symmetry in Participatory Research with Children].” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 19 (3): Art. 21. 10.17169/fqs-19.3.3120.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1980. “The Confession of the Flesh.” In Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings (New York: Pantheon), edited by Gordon Colin, 194–228.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1988. “Technologies of the Self.” In Technologies of the Self, edited by Luther H. Martin, Huck Gutman, and Patrick H. Hutton, 16–49. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2001. “The Subject and Power” In Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1985, edited by Faubion, James D. 326–348. Vol. 3. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, Marilys, and Lynn Gillam. 2004. “Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 10 (2): 261–280. doi:10.1177/1077800403262360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, Melanie. 2017. “Spatializing Inequalities: The Situation of Women in Refugee Centres in Germany.” In Gender, Violence, Refugees, edited by Susanne Buckley-Zistel and Ulrike Krause, 102–126. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzel, Andreas. 2005. “Technik Als Vermittlung Und Dispositiv. Über Die Vielfältige Wirksamkeit der Maschinen [Technology as Mediation and Device. On the Manifold Effectiveness of Machines.” In Unbestimmtheitssignaturen der Technik. Eine Neue Deutung der Technisierten Welt [Indeterminacy Signatures of Technology. A New Interpretation of the Mechanized World], edited by Gerhard Gamm and Andreas Hetzel, 275–296. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Reiner. 2008. Michel Foucault. Konstanz: UVK.
   Google Scholar
• Köppen, Marilena von, Kristina Schmidt, and Sabine Tiefenthaler. 2020. “Mit Vulnerablen Gruppen Forschen – Ein Forschungsprozessmodell Als Reflexionshilfe Für Partizipative Projekte [Research with Vulnerable Groups - a Research Process Model as a Reflection Aid for Participatory Projects.” In Partizipative Forschung – Ein Forschungsansatz Für Gesundheit Und Seine Methoden [Participatory Research - a Research Approach for Health and Its Methods], edited by Susanne Hartung, Petra Wihofszky, and Michael T. Wright, 21–62. Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Lenette, Caroline. 2019. Arts-based methods in refugee research: Creating sanctuary. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leon, De, P. Jason, and Jeffrey H. Cohen. 2005. “Object and Walking Probes in Ethnographic Interviewing.” Field Methods 17 (2): 200–204. doi:10.1177/1525822X05274733.
   Google Scholar
• Mick, Carola. 2012. “Das Agency-Paradigma [Agency – A Paradigm.” In Handbuch Bildungs- Und Erziehungssoziologie [Handbook on the Sociology of Education], edited by Ullrich Bauer, Uwe H. Bittlingmayer, and Albert Scherr, 527–541. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Nind, Melanie 2008. “Conducting Qualitative Research with People with Learning, Communication and Other Disabilities: Methodological Challenges.” (http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/491/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-012.pdf, 16.04.2020).
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, Frank, and Graham. D. Rowles. 2006. “Beyond the Relocation Trauma in Old Age: New Trends in Today’s Elders’ Residential Decisions.” In New Dynamics in Old Age: Environmental and Societal Perspectives, edited by Hans-W. Wahl, Clemens Tesch-Römer, and Andreas Hoff, 127–152. Amityville, New York: Baywood Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Pieper, Tobias. Auflage 2013. Die Gegenwart der Lager. Zur Mikrophysik der Herrschaft in der Deutschen Flüchtlingspolitik [The Presence of the Camps. On the Microphysics of Dominance in German Refugee Policy]. 2. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Raithelhuber, Eberhard. 2008. “Von Akteuren Und Agency – Eine Sozialtheoretische Einordnung der structure/agency-Debatte [Of Actors and Agency - a Social Theoretical Classification of the Structure/agency Debate.” In Vom Adressaten Zum Akteur – Soziale Arbeit Und Agency [From Addressee to Actor - Social Work and Agency], edited by Hans G. Homfeldt, Wolfgang Schröer, and Cornelia Schweppe, 17–45. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Raithelhuber, Eberhard. 2011. Übergänge Und Agency: Eine Sozialtheoretische Reflexion Des Lebenslaufkonzepts [Transitions and Agency: A Social Theoretical Reflection on the Life Course Concept]. Opladen: Budrich UniPress.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, Andreas. 2008. Subjekt. Subject. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, Andi. 2015. “Ethical Symmetry in Participatory Research with Infants.” Early Child Development and Care 185 (6): 1016–1030. doi:10.1080/03004430.2014.975224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäper, Sabine. 2018. “Einwilligung als Befähigungsprozess [Consent as an enabling process].” Behindertenpädagogik [Disability Education] 57 (2): 134–146. doi:10.30820/8237.03.
   Google Scholar
• Waldschmidt, Anne 2008. “Wir Normalen“ – „die Behinderten“? Erving Goffman meets Michel Foucault.” In Die Natur der Gesellschaft: Verhandlungen des 33. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Kassel 2006 [The Nature of Society: Proceedings of the 33rd Congress of the German Sociological Association in Kassel 2006], edited by Karl S. Rehberg, 5799–5809. Teilband. 1 u. 2. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, Jan, and Kelly Johnson. 2003. Inclusive Research with People with Learning Disabilities. Past, Present and Futures. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar