Action research in the plural crisis of the living: understanding, envisioning, practicing, organising eco-social transformation

References

• Adorno, T., and M. Horkheimer. 1944. Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altieri, M. 2004. “Linking Ecologists and Traditional Farmers in the Search for Sustainable Agriculture.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2 (1): 35–42. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0035:LEATFI]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S., S. Carney, and L. Hulgard. 2021. People-Centered Social Innovation Global Perspectives on an Emerging Paradigm. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S., L. Lucas dos Santos, and L. Hulgård. 2021. “Intersectional Knowledge as Rural Social Innovation.” Journal of Rural Studies, April. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bladt, M., and K. a. Nielsen. 2013. “Free Space in the Processes of Action Research.” Action Research 11 (4): 369–385. doi:10.1177/1476750313502556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, H. 2015. “How to Situate and Define Action Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Action Research, edited by H. Bradbury, 2–9, SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, H., S. Waddell, K. O’ Brien, M. Apgar, B. Teehankee, and I. Fazey. 2019. “A Call to Action Research for Transformations: The Times Demand It.” Action Research 17 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1177/1476750319829633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller, M., D. Greenwood, and P. Maguire. 2009. “Why Action Research?” Action Research 1 (1): 9–27. doi:10.1177/14767503030011002.
   Google Scholar
• Eames, M., J. Mortensen, M. Adebowale, and I Iudicissa. 2009. Community Engagement for Science and Sustainability: Insights from the Citizens Science for Sustainability (Suscit) Project. Brunel University.
   Google Scholar
• Eames, M., and J. Egmose. 2011. “Community Foresight for Urban Sustainability: Insights from the Citizens Science for Sustainability (Suscit) Project.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (5): 769–784. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egmose, J. 2015. Action Research for Sustainability. Social Imagination between Citizens and Scientists. Farnham & Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Egmose, J., J. Gleerup, and B. S. Nielsen. 2020. “Critical Utopian Action Research. Methodological Inspiration for Democratization?” International Review of Qualitative Research 13 (2): 233–246. doi:10.1177/1940844720933236.
   Google Scholar
• Egmose, J., S. G. Jacobsen, H. Hauggaard-Nielsen, and L. Hulgård. 2021. “The Regenerative Turn: On the Re-emergence of Reciprocity Embedded in Living Ecologies.” Globalizations 18 (7): 1271–1276. doi:10.1080/14747731.2021.1911508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsen, S. 2018. “Eco-Social Transformation and Community-Based Economy.” Eco-Social Transformation and Community-Based Economy. doi:10.4324/9781351119863.
   Google Scholar
• Eynaud, P., J.-L. Laville, L. dos Santos, S. Banerjee, F. Avelino, and L. Hulgård. 2019. Theory of Social Enterprise and Pluralism Social Movements, Solidarity Economy, and Global South. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., and R. Jaeggi. 2018. Capitalism. A Conversation in Critical Theory. Cambridge & Medford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder & Herder.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J., J. Camaron, and S. Healy. 2013. Take Back the Economy. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnarson, E., H. Hansen, and B. S. Nielsen. 2015. Action Research for Democracy. New Ideas and Perspectives from Scandinavia. Routledge Advances in Research Methods. New York & Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H.P., B.S. Nielsen, and S. Nadarajah. 2016. Commons, Sustainability, Democratization: Action Research and the Basic Renewal of Society. Routledge Advances in Research Methods. New York & Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, E. M. Ø, J. Egmose, S. Lund, and H. Hauggaard-Nielsen. 2020. “The Role of Experience Exchange Groups in Farmers’ Practice Transitions: The Case of Reduced Tillage in Danish Conventional Farming.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 1–21. doi:10.1080/21683565.2020.1726550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. 1947. Eclipse of Reason. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. (2019). “Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services”.
   Google Scholar
• Jungk, R., and N. Mullert. 1987. Future Workshops: How to Create Desirable Futures. Institute for Social Inventions.
   Google Scholar
• Kettleborough, H. M. 2019. “Gaia’s Graveyards – Bearing Witness as First Person Inquiry.” Action Research 17 (3): 292–322. doi:10.1177/1476750318818881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaCanne, C. E., and J. G. Lundgren. 2018. “Regenerative Agriculture: Merging Farming and Natural Resource Conservation Profitably.” PeerJ 2018 (2): 1–12. doi:10.7717/peerj.4428.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. 1946. Resolving Social Conflicts. K. Lewin,ed.Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Negt, O. 1984. Lebendige Arbeit, enteignete Zeit. Politiche und kulturelle Dimensinen des Kampfes um die Arbeitszeit. Campus. Living Labour, Dispossessed Time. Political and Cultural Dimensions of the Struggle for Working Time. Frankfurt/Main.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K. A., and B. S. Nielsen. 2006. “Methodologies in Action Research. Action Research and Critical Theory.” In Action Research and Interactive Research. Beyond Theory and Practice, edited by L. Svensson and K. A. Nielsen. Maastricht.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, B. S., and K. A. Nielsen. 2015. “Critical Utopian Action Research. The Potentials of Action Research in Democratisation of Society.” In Action Research for Democracy. New Ideas and Perspectives from Scandinavia, edited by E. Gunnarson, H. P. Hansen, and B.S. Nielsen. New York & Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., and S. Canney. 2015. “Action Research and Ecological Practice.” In Sage Handbook of Action Research, edited by H. Bradbury. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C. J. 2017. “The Imperative for Regenerative Agriculture.” Science Progress 100 (1): 80–129. doi:10.3184/003685017X14876775256165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockström, J. et. al., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F S. Chapin, E F. Lambin, and T M. Lenton. 2009. “A Safe Operation Space for Humanity.” Nature 461: 472–475. doi:10.1038/461472a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelvink, G., K. St. Martin, and J. K. Gibson-Graham. 2015. Making Other Worlds Possible. Performing Diverse Economies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, W. 2010. “Environment.” In Development Dictionary. A Guide to Knowledge as Power, edited by W. Sachs, 24–37. Vol. Second. London & New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, B.S. 2008. Another Knowledge Is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder, J. et. al., Hein F. M. Ten Berge, F. Bampa, R E. Creamer, J V. Giraldez-Cervera, C B. Henriksen, J E. Olesen, M. Rutgers, T. Sandén, and H. Spiegel. 2020. “Multi-Functional Land Use Is Not Self-Evident for European Farmers: A Critical Review.” Frontiers in Environmental Science 8 (September): 1–10. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2020.575466.
   Google Scholar
• Tofteng, D. M. B., and M. Husted. 2014. “Critical Utopian Action Research.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research. 1sted., edited by D. Coghlan and M. Brydon-Miller, 230–232. Los Angeles, London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar