A culturally relevant action research model for Bhutanese secondary science teachers

References

• Buaraphan, K. 2016. “The Development of Qualitative Classroom Action Research Workshop for In-Service Teachers.” Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching 17 (1): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, A., and D. Rochsantiningsih. 2006. “Conducting Action Research in Indonesia: Illustrations and Implications.” Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching 2 (1): 21–35. https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v2i1.111.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, R. 2018. “Collaborative Partnerships within Communities of Practice: The Need for School-Based Action Research in Bangladesh.” In Engaging in Educational Research: Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, edited by Raqib Chowdhury, Mahbub Sarkar, Foez Mojumder, and M. Moninor Roshid, 159–178. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0708-9_9.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. 2009. “The Purpose of Mess in Action Research: Building Rigour Through a Messy Turn.” Educational Action Research 17 (2): 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790902914241.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, B. L. 2006. “Action research: A Viable Alternative for In-service Teacher Professional Development.“ Paper presented at Quality in Education: Teaching and Leadership in Challenging Times, Karachi, Pakistan, February 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, B. L. 2009. “Action Research: In Search of an Effective Teacher Professional Development Strategy.” In Schools and Schooling Practices in Pakistan: Lessons for Policy and Practice, edited by Rashida Qureshi and Fauzia Shamim, 87–110. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorji, J. 2005. Quality of Education in Bhutan: The Story of Growth and Change in the Bhutanese Education System. Bhutan: KMT Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, X., and W. Melville. 2008. “Science Teacher Development Through Collaborative Action Research.” Teacher Development 12 (3): 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530802259222.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 3rd ed. USA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D. 2008. A Teacher’s Guide to Classroom Research. 4th ed. McGraw Hill Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 1988. The Action Research Planner. 3rd ed. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., R. McTaggart, and R. Nixon. 2014. The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kijkuakul, S. 2019. “Professional Changes of Primary Science Teachers: Experience on Collaborative Action Research in Thailand.” Asia-Pacific Science Education 5 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0030-2.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. 1946. “Action Research and Minority Problems.” Journal of Social Issues 2 (4): 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. 1947. “Frontiers in Group Dynamics: II. Channels of Group Life; Social Planning and Action Research.” Human Relations 1 (2): 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, T. W. 2003. “Action Research for Bhutan.” RABSEL, the CERD Educational Journal 3 (1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, G. E. 2000. Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2013. In-Service Education and Training (INSET) Master Plan. Thimphu: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2014. Bhutan Education Blueprint 2014-2024: Rethinking Education. Bhutan: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2019. Bhutan Professional Standards for Teachers. Bhutan: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pardhan, H. 2005. “Action Research for Female Science Teacher Development: Case Pakistan.” European Journal of Scientific Research 6 (1): 46–64.
   Google Scholar
• Paro College of Education. 2009. Bachelor of Education Primary Program Document. Bhutan: Paro College of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Phuntsho, K. 2004. “Echoes of Ancient Ethos: Reflections on Some Popular Bhutanese Social Themes.” In The spider and the piglet: Proceedings of the First Seminar on Bhutan Studies, Thimphu, edited by Karma Ura and Sonam Kinga, 564–580. Centre for Bhutan Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Pine, G. J. 2009. Teacher Action Research: Building Knowledge Democracies. California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452275079.
   Google Scholar
• Robles, C. M. 2016. Education and Society in Bhutan: Tradition and Modernisation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Education Council. 2012. Science Curriculum Framework PP-12. Bhutan: Royal Education Council.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Education Council. 2016. National School Curriculum Conference 2016: Rethinking Education. Bhutan: Royal Education Council.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Education Council. 2018. A Guide to Action Research: Enhancing Professional Practice of Teachers in Bhutan. Bhutan: Royal Education Council.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Education Council. 2019. Bhutan Civics. Classes IX & X. Paro: Royal Education Council.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, F., and E. Meyers. 2006. “The Bright Side: Teacher Research in the Context of Educational Reform and Policy.” Teachers & Teaching: Theory & Practice 12 (1): 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13450600500365452.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salleh, H. 2006. “Action Research in Singapore Education: Constraints and Sustainability.” Educational Action Research 14 (4): 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790600975684.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B., and K. Zeichner. 2009. “Action Research for Educational Reform: Remodelling Action Research Theories and Practices in Local Contexts.” Educational Action Research 17 (1): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802667402.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. M. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tindowen, D. J., J. Guzman, and D. Macanang. 2019. “Teachers’ Conception and Difficulties in Doing Action Research.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 7 (8): 1787–1794. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070817.
   Google Scholar
• Tinker-Sachs, G. 2000. “Teacher and Researcher Autonomy in Action Research.” Prospect: A Journal of Australian TESOL 15 (3): 35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ulla, M. B., K. B. Barrera, and M. M. Acompanado. 2017. “Philippine Classroom Teachers as Researchers: Teachers’ Perceptions, Motivations, and Challenges.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 42 (11): 52–64. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n11.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitecross, R. W. 2017. “Law, “Tradition” and Legitimacy: Contesting Driglam Namzha.” In Development Challenges in Bhutan: Perspectives on Inequality and Gross National Happiness, edited by D. Schmidt Jerry, 115–134. Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47925-5_7.
   Google Scholar