Synthesisability and optimising exploratory action research for continuing professional development

References

• Allwright, Dick. 2003. “Exploratory Practice: Rethinking Practitioner Research in Language Teaching.” Language Teaching Research 7 (2): 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168803lr118oa.
   Google Scholar
• Allwright, Dick. 2005. “Developing Principles for Practitioner Research: The Case of Exploratory Practice.” The Modern Language Journal 89 (3): 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00310.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allwright, Dick, and Judith Hanks. 2009. The Development Language Learner: An Introduction to Exploratory Practice. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233690.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, Lydia. 2020. “Reflection and Action Research: How Do They Work Together?” Accessed March 14, 2023. https://lydia-arnold.com/2020/06/29/reflection-and-action-research-how-do-they-work-together/.
   Google Scholar
• Athikarisamy, Sam, and Sanjay Patole. 2021. “Reporting of Meta-Analysis (PRISMA).” In Principles and Practice of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, edited by Sanjay Patole, 111–123. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Aubrey, Scott, and Andrew Philpott. 2022. “Use of the L1 and L2 in Strategic Planning and Rehearsal for Task Performances in an Online Classroom.” Language Teaching Research 0 (0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221077421.
   Google Scholar
• Barradell, Sarah, and Amani Bell. 2021. “Is Health Professional Education Making the Most of the Idea of ‘Students As partners’? Insights from a Qualitative Research Synthesis.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 26 (2): 513–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-09998-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergdahl, Elisabeth. 2019. “Is Meta-Synthesis Turning Rich Descriptions into Thin Reductions? A Criticism of Meta-Aggregation As a Form of Qualitative Synthesis.” Nursing Inquiry 26 (1): e12273. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, Simon. 2009. “English Language Teachers’ Conceptions of Research.” Applied Linguistics Review 30 (3): 358–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp007.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, Simon. 2010. “Language Teacher Research Engagement.” Language Teaching 43 (4): 391–429. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444810000170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, Hazel, and Bob Burstow. 2018. “Understanding Ethics in School-Based Research.” Professional Development in Education 44 (1): 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1361464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, Anne. 2005. “Action Research: An Evolving Paradigm?” Language Teaching 38 (2): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444805002661.
   Google Scholar
• Bustos-Moraga, Claudia, and Steve Mann. 2022. “Mentoring Teacher Research Online.” In International Perspectives on Mentoring in English Language Education, edited by Mark Wyatt and Kenan Dikilitaş, 249–267. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• CARN. 2023. “Mission and Philosophy.” Accessed October 9, 2023. https://www.carn.org.uk/about/.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, Wilfred, and Stephen Kemmis. 2003. Becoming Critical. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496626.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Tsuiping. 2016. “Technology-Supported Peer Feedback in ESL/EFL Writing Classes: A Research Synthesis.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 29 (2): 365–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.960942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Julian Chengchiang, and Kimberly Lynn Brown. 2012. “The Effects of Authentic Audience on English As a Second Language (ESL) Writers: A Task-Based, Computer-Mediated Approach.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 25 (5): 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.606224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, Sin Wang. 2020. “The Role of Research Synthesis in Facilitating Research–Pedagogy Dialogue.” ELT Journal 74 (4): 484–487. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, Sin Wang, and Luke Plonsky. 2021. “A Primer on Qualitative Research Synthesis in TESOL.” TESOL Quarterly 55 (3): 1024–1034. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, Sin Wang, and Hayo Reinders. 2020. “Technology-Mediated Task-Based Language Teaching: A Qualitative Research Synthesis.” Language Learning & Technology 24 (3): 70–86. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, Sin Wang, and Hayo Reinders. 2021. “A Methodological Review of Qualitative Research Syntheses in CALL: The State-Of-The-Art.” System 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, Sin Wang, and Hayo Reinders. 2022. “Autonomy of English Language Learners: A Scoping Review of Research and Practice.” Language Teaching Research 0 (0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221075812.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion, and Keith Morrison. 2018. Research Methods in Education. 8th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Consoli, Sal, and Kenan Dikilitaş. 2021. “Research Engagement in Language Education.” Educational Action Research 29 (3): 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1933860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, Robert M., Maris G. Martinsons, and Louie H. M. Wong. 2022. “The Ethics of Action Research Participation.” Information Systems Journal 32 (3): 573–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikilitaş, Kenan, and Mark Wyatt. 2018. “Learning Teacher-Research-Mentoring: Stories from Turkey.” Teacher Development 22 (4): 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2017.1403369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draux, Hélene, Mithu Lucraft, and John Walker. 2018. “Assessing the Open Access Effect for Hybrid Journals.” White Paper. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Elizabeth, Nye, Gerado J. Melendez-Torres, and Chris Bonell. 2016. “Origins, Methods and Advances in Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.” Review of Education 4 (1): 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3065.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrance, Eileen. 2000. Themes in Education: Action Research. Providence, RI: Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory. www.lab.brown.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Flemming, Kate, and Jane Noyes. 2021. “Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Where Are We At?” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20:160940692199327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921993276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fully Inclusive Practitioner Research. 2024. “A Platform for Sharing Our FIPR Around the World.” https://www.fullyinclusivepr.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Costa, Daniel, Anabel Forte, Emilia Lòpez-Iñesta, Flaminio Squazzoni, and Francisco Grimaldo. 2022. “Does Peer Review Improve the Statistical Content of Manuscripts? A Study on 27 467 Submissions to Four Journals.” Royal Society Open Science 9 (9). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210681.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerashchenko, Alexander, Tatiana Shaposhnikova, Alena Egorova, and Dmitry Romanov. 2021. “Challenges of Human-Computer Interaction in Foreign Language Teaching: The Case of a Russian Technological University.” In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, edited by Tareq Ahram, Redha Taiar, and Fabienne Groff, 170–176. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• González-Lloret, Marta. 2015. A Practical Guide to Integrating Technology into Task-Based Language Teaching. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• González-Lloret, Marta, and Lourdes Ortega. 2014. “Towards Technology-Mediated TBLT.” In Technology-Mediated TBLT: Researching Technology and Tasks, edited by Marta González-Lloret and Lourdes Ortega, 336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• González-Lloret, Marta, and Nicole Ziegler. 2021. “Technology-Mediated Task-Based Language Teaching.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching: Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics, edited by Mohammad Javad Ahmadian and Michael H. Long, 326–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura, and Melissa Baralt. 2015. “Does Type of Modified Output Correspond to Learner Noticing of Feedback? A Closer Look in Face-To-Face and Computer-Mediated Task-Based Interaction.” Applied Psycholinguistics 36 (6): 1393–1420. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanks, Judith. 2017. Exploratory Practice in Language Teaching: Puzzling About Principles and Practices. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, Judith. 2022. “Integrating Research into Language Teaching and Learning: Learners and Teachers As Co-Researchers Exploring Praxis.” Language Teaching 55 (2): 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482100032X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes, Geralyn. 2012. “First, Second, and Third Person Inquiry.” In Participatory Research in Palliative Care: Actions and Reflections, edited by Geralyn Hynes, Jo Hockley, Katherine Froggatt, and Katharina Heimerl, 53–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, Sarah. 2013. “Qualitative Secondary Data Analysis: Ethics, Epistemology and Context.” Progress in Development Studies 13 (4): 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993413490479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Daniel O. 2022. “Task-Based Language Teaching.” In Elements in Language Teaching, edited by Heath Rose and Jim McKinley, 74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• John, Kristen St, and Karen S McNeal. 2017. “The Strength of Evidence Pyramid: One Approach for Characterizing the Strength of Evidence of Geoscience Education Research (GER) Community Claims.” Journal of Geoscience Education 65 (4): 363–372. https://doi.org/10.5408/17-264.1.
   Google Scholar
• Language Learning and Technology. n.d. “About.” National Foreign Language Resource Center. Accessed January 11, 2022. https://www.lltjournal.org/about/.
   Google Scholar
• Lara, Bryfonski, and Todd H. McKay. 2019. “TBLT Implementation and Evaluation: A Meta-Analysis.” Language Teaching Research 23 (5): 603–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817744389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leow, Ronald P., Anne Thinglum, Maude Havenne, and Rina Tseng. 2022. “Bridging the Gap Between Researchers and Teachers: A Curricular Perspective.” The Modern Language Journal 106 (3): 564–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, Simon, Andrew Booth, Claire Glenton, Heather Munthe-Kaas, Arash Rashidian, Megan Wainwright, Meghan A. Bohren, et al. 2018. “Applying GRADE-CERQual to Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Findings: Introduction to the Series.” Implementation Science 13:S1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0688-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, Alison, and Susan M. Gass. 2015. “Introduction to Research.” In Second Language Research : Methodology and Design, 1–29. London, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, Emma, Inge Alferink, Sible Andringa, Cylcia Bolibaugh, Laura Collins, Carrie Jackson, Rowena Kasprowicz, David O’Reilly, and Luke Plonsky. 2018. “Open Accessible Summaries in Language Studies (OASIS) [Database].” Accessed October 20, 2023. https://www.oasis-database.org.
   Google Scholar
• Medgyes, Péter. 2017. “The (Ir)relevance of Academic Research for the Language Teacher.” ELT Journal 71 (4): 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, Katie, and Deborah Blackman. 2014. “A Guide to Understanding Social Science Research for Natural Scientists.” Conservation Biology 28 (5): 1167–1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, Matthew J., Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, et al. 2021. “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews.” BMJ n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paran, Amos. 2017. “‘Only connect’: Researchers and Teachers in Dialogue.” ELT Journal 71 (4): 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebolledo, Paula, Richard Smith, and Deborah Bullock. 2016. Champion Teachers: Stories of Exploratory Action Research. London: The British Council. http://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/attachments/british_council_champion_teachers_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reinders, Hayo, and Sorada Wattana. 2015. “Affect and Willingness to Communicate in Digital Game-Based Learning.” ReCALL 27 (1): 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344014000226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Révész, Andrea. 2021. “Methodological Approaches to Investigating Task-Based Language Teaching: Advances and Challenges.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, edited by Mohammad Javad Ahmadian and Michael H. Long, 605–627. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, Robert. 1979. “The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.” Psychological Bulletin 86 (3): 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, Margarete. 2006. “‘Meta-Jeopardy: The Crisis of Representation in Qualitative Metasynthesis.” Nursing Outlook 54 (1): 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2005.05.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, Margarete, Sharron Docherty, and Carolyn Emden. 1997. “Focus on Qualitative Methods. Qualitative Metasynthesis: Issues and Techniques.” Research in Nursing & Health 20 (4): 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199708)20:4<365:AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-E.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, Masatoshi, and Shawn Loewen. 2022. “The Research–Practice Dialogue in Second Language Learning and Teaching: Past, Present, and Future.” The Modern Language Journal 106 (3): 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Seyyedrezaei, Masumeh Sadat, Mohammad Amiryousefi, Ana Gimeno-Sanz, and Mansoor Tavakoli. 2022. “A Meta-Analysis of the Relative Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Language Learning on ESL/EFL Writing Performance: Retrospect and Prospect.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2118782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddaway, Andy P., Alex M. Wood, and Larry V. Hedges. 2019. “How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews.” Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses 70 (1): 747–765. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803.
   Google Scholar
• Slimani-Rolls, Assia, and Richard Kiely. 2019. Exploratory Practice for Continuing Professional Development. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69763-5.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Richard. 2015. “Exploratory Action Research As Workplan: Why, What and Where From?” In Teacher-Researchers in Action, edited by Kenan Dikilitaş, Richard Smith, and Wayne Trotman, 37–45. Kent: IATEFL.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Richard. 2020. Mentoring Teachers to Research Their Classrooms: A Practical Handbook. New Delhi: British Council India. https://www.britishcouncil.in/sites/default/files/mentoring_teachers_to_research_their_classrooms_a_practical_handbook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Richard, Tom Connelly, and Paula Rebolledo. 2014. “Teacher-Research As Continuing Professional Development: A Project with Chilean Secondary School Teachers.” In Innovations in the Continuing Professional Development of English Language Teachers, edited by David Hayes, 111–132. London: British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Bryan, and Marta González-Lloret. 2021. “Technology-Mediated Task-Based Language Teaching: A Research Agenda.” Language Teaching 54 (4): 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444820000233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Richard, and Paula Rebolledo. 2022. Exploratory Action Research for Enhanced Teaching and learning: British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/exploratory_action_research_for_enhanced_teaching_and_learning.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Richard, Paula Rebolledo, Fauzia Shamim, and Mark Wyatt. 2015. “Supporting Teacher-Research: Challenges and Opportunities.” Paper presented at the IATEFL 2014 Harrogate Conference Selections, Faversham.
   Google Scholar
• Solares, Maria Elena. 2014. “Textbooks, Tasks and Technology: An Action Research Study in a Textbook-Bound EFL Context.” In Exploring Technology-Mediated Task-Based Language Teaching Across Foreign Language Contexts, edited by Lourdes Ortega and Marta González-Lloret, 79–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, Abbas, R. Burke Johnson, and Charles Teddlie. 2020. Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2 ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, Hossein, Ahmad Reza Lotfi, and Reza Biria. 2019. “Effects of CALL-Mediated TBLT on Motivation for L2 Reading.” Cogent Education 6 (1): 1580916. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2019.1580916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, Denis, and Soo Downe. 2005. “Meta-Synthesis Method for Qualitative Research: A Literature Review.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 50 (2): 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeni, Jane. 1998. “A Guide to Ethical Issues and Action Research.” Educational Action Research 6 (1): 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799800200053.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, Nicole. 2016. “Taking Technology to Task: Technology-Mediated TBLT, Performance, and Production.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36:136–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190516000039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar