Is There Really Something Like “Eastern Europe”? And If So, Why Do We Need Area Studies of It?

References

• Ágh, Attila. 1998. The Politics of Central Europe. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Althusser, Louis. 1976. “Reply to John Lewis.” In Essays in Self-Criticism, Translated and edited by Grahame Lock, 34–77. London: New Left Books.
   Google Scholar
• Andreev, Svetlozar A. 2009. Is Populism the “Bad Wolf”? Post-accession Crisis of Representative Democracy in Bulgaria and Romania. Aberdeen, SD: Centre for the Study of Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. 1955. Elemente und Ursprünge Totaler Herrschaft [The Origins of Totalitarianism]. Frankfurt a.M.: Büchergilde Gutenberg.
   Google Scholar
• Arnason, Johann P. 1993. The Future that Failed Origins and Destinies of the Soviet Model. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baberowski, Jörg. 1998. “Das Ende der Osteuropäischen Geschichte. Bemerkungen zur Lage einer geschichtswissenschaftlichen Disziplin” [“The End of the East European History. Comments on the State of the Art in a Sub-discipline of the Science of History”]. Osteuropa 48 (8/9): S784–S799.
   Google Scholar
• Berend, Ivan T. 1996. Central and Eastern Europe, 1944–1993: Detour from the Periphery to the Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511581748
   Google Scholar
• Berend, Ivan T. 2007. “Social Shock in Transforming Central and Eastern Europe.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 40 (3): 269–280. 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2007.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, Chris. 2004. Postsocialist Cinema in Post-Maoist China: The Cultural Revolution after the Cultural Revolution. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• von Beyme, Klaus. 1994. Systemwechsel in Osteuropa [Systemic change in Eastern Europe]. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch Wissenschaft 1130.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, Dorothee, and Gisela Neunhöffer. 2007. “Why Is There No Third Way? The Role of Neoliberal Ideology, Networks and Think-tanks in Combating Market Socialism and Shaping Transformation in Poland.” In Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique, edited by D. Plehwe, B. Walpen, and G. Neunhöffer, 89–105. Vol. 18. London: Routledge (RIPE Series in Global Political Economy 18).
   Google Scholar
• Brandelj, Nina. 2008. From Communists to Foreign Capitalists: The Socials Foundations of Foreign Direct Investment in Postsocialist Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brie, Michael. 1996. “Staatssozialistische Länder Europas im Vergleich” [“State Socialist Countries of Europe in Comparison”]. In Einheit als Privileg. Vergleichende Perspektiven auf die Transformation Ostdeutschlands [Unification as Privilege. Comparative Perspectives in the Transformation of Eastern Germany], edited by H. Wiesenthal, 39–104. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Brier, Robert. 2011. “Adam Michnik's Understanding of Totalitarianism and the West European Left: A Historical and Transnational Approach to Dissident Political Thought.” East European Politics and Societies 25 (2): 197–218.10.1177/0888325410387644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, Michael, and Katherine Verdery, eds. 1999. Uncertain Transition: Ethnographies of Change in Postsocialist World. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Chirot, Daniel. 1989. The Origins of Backwardness in Eastern Europe: Economics and Politics from the Middle Ages until the Early Twentieth Century. Conference papers, edited by D. Chirot. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Linda J. 1993. The Social Contract and Why It Failed: Welfare Policy and Workers’ Politics from Brezhnev to Yeltsin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creuzberger u.a., Stephan (Hrsg.) 2000. Wohin Steuert Die Osteuropaforschung? Eine Diskussion [Whereto goes the research on Eastern Europe? A controversy]. Köln: Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrke, Michael. 2007. Ungarische Unruhen – ein Symptom der zentraleuropäischen Beitrittskrise? [Hungarian unrest – A symptom for the accession crisis in Central Europe?] FES: Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft Online 2007/1.
   Google Scholar
• End of Communism. 2009. “End of Communism Cheered but Now with More Reservations, Opinion Poll of the Pew Global Attitudes Project.” Released November 2, 2009. Accessed February 23, 2013. http://www.pewglobal.org/2009/11/02/end-of-communism-cheered-but-now-with-more-reservations/
   Google Scholar
• Engels, Frederic. 1894. “Letter to Borgius, January 1894.” In Marx & Engels Internet Archive/Marx-Engels Correspondence 1894. Accessed February 23, 2013. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894/letters/94_01_25.htm
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, Carl Joachim (with Zbiegniew Brzezinski). 1957. Totalitäre Diktatur [Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy]. Stuttgert: Kohlhammer.
   Google Scholar
• Hann, Chris. 2002. Postsocialism: Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203428115
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, Stephen E. 2009. “The Contribution of Area Studies.” In The Sage Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Todd Landman and Neil Robinson, 159–174. Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• King, Lawrence. 2002. “Postcommunist Divergence: A Comparative Analysis of Transition to Capitalism in Poland and Russia.” Studies in Comparative International Development 37 (Fall): 3–34. 10.1007/BF02686229
   Google Scholar
• King, Lawrence, and Iván Szelényi. 2005. “Post-communist Economic Systems.” In The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil J. Smelser, 205–232. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch, Jörn. 2011. “Postdemokratie und Postsozialismus. Zur Konvergenz zweier Krisen am Beispiel Russlands” [“Postdemocracy and Post-socialism. On the Convergence of two crises using the example of Russia”]. In Herausforderungen und Gefährdungen der Demokratie durch neue Bedingungen und Akteurinnen [Challenge and Endangering of Democracy by New Conditions and New Agents]. Themenheft [special issue of] der Österreichischen Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, edited by Ulrich Brand et al. 39 (2): 169–182.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmorgen, Raj. 2012. “Anfang vom Ende oder Ende des Anfangs? Zum Stand der transformationstheoretischen Debatte über den Postsozialismus” [“The Start of the Final Stage or the End of the Initial Stage? The State of the Art of the Discussion about Post-socialism”]. In Osteuropa als Herausforderung: Forschung zwischen Area Studies und Mainstream [Eastern Europe as a challenge: Research between Area Studies and Mainstream: Honorary Publication for Melanie Tartur], edited by Kerstin Zimmer S15–S42. Stuttgart: Ibidem.
   Google Scholar
• Kornai, János. 2006. “The Great Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe. Success and Disappointment.” Economics of Transition 14 (2): 207–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, David. 2005. “Russia’s Asymetric Capitalism in Comparative Perspective.” In How to Explain Russia’s post-Soviet Political and Economic System? edited by Heiko Pleines, 46–60. Bremen: Forschungsstelle Osteuropa [Research Institute on Eastern Europe].
   Google Scholar
• Linz, Juan J., and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation in Southern Europe, South America, and Post-communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 1967. “Das Kapital. Zur Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie, Band 1” [“Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1”]. In Marx-Engels Werke, Band 23. Berlin: Dietz.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Gerd. 2008. “Formal and Informal Politics: Questions, Concepts and Subjects.” In Formal Institutions and Informal Politics Informal Politics in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Gerd Meyer, 15–142. Opladen & Farmington Hill: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, Joseph, and Nancy M. Wingfield. 2000. Return to Diversity. A Political History of East Central Europe Since World War II. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segert, Dieter, Machos Csilla. 1995. Parteien in Osteuropa - Kontext und Akteure [Parties in Eastern Europe – Actors and Framework]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Segert, Dieter. 1998. “Was war die DDR? Schnitte durch ihr politisches System” [“What was the GDR? Different Perspectives on Its Political System”]. Berliner Debatte Initial 2–3: 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Segert, Dieter. 2002. Die Grenzen Osteuropas. 1918, 1945, 1989 – Drei Versuche im Westen anzukommen [Borderlines/Limits of Eastern Europe. 1918, 1945, 1989 – Three Attempts to Catch-up with the West]. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Segert, Dieter, ed. 2007. Postsozialismus: Hinterlassenschaften des Staatssozialismus und neue Kapitalismen in Europa [Post Socialism: Legacies of State Socialism and new Capitalisms in Europe]. Wien: Braumüller.
   Google Scholar
• Segert, Dieter. 2009a. “Der Staatssozialismus war mehr als nur ein politisches Herrschaftsverhältnis Anmerkungen zu einem theoretischen Defizit des Totalitarismuskonzepts” [“State Socialism was not only a Political Regime. A Comment on the Concept of Totalitarianism”]. Bohemia 49 (2/2010): 412–420. (auf Tschechisch abgedruckt unter dem Titel “Státní socialismus nebyl jen politický mocenský vztah” - in Soudobé Dějniy 4/2009, 709-718.)
   Google Scholar
• Segert, Dieter. 2009b.“The GDR Intelligentsia and Its Forgotten Role During the Wende of 1989.” Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 17 (2): 143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Segert, Dieter. 2013. Transformationen in Osteuropa im 20. Jahrhundert [Transformation Processes in Eastern Europe in the 20th Century]. Wien: UTB/Facultas.
   Google Scholar
• Staritz, Dietrich. 1996. Geschichte der DDR [History of GDR]. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Stykow, Petra. 2012. “Postsozialismus” [“Post socialism”], in “Docupedia-Zeitgeschichte.” Accessed November 15, 2013. http://docupedia.de/zg/Postsozialismus
   Google Scholar
• Süß, Walter. 1999. Staatssicherheit am Ende. Warum es den Mächtigen nicht gelang, 1989 Eine Revolution zu verhindern [State Security at the End. Why it Was Not Possible For the Power Holder to Avoid a Revolution]. Berlin: Ch. Links.
   Google Scholar
• Svašek, Maruška. 2005. Postsocialism: Politics and Emotions in Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Szücz, Jenö. 1990. Die drei historischen Regionen Europas [The Three Historical Regions of Europe; the Original Hungarian Publication is from 1983]. Frankfurt a.M.: Neue Kritik.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Todorova, Marija. 1997. Imagining the Balkans. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verdery, Katherine. 1996. What Was Socialism, and What Comes Next? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400821990
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Larry. 1994. Inventing Eastern Europe: The Map of Civilization in the Mind of the Enlightment. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yurchak, Alexei. 2006. Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar