Monetary vs. nonmonetary prices: differences in product evaluations due to pricing strategies within mobile applications

References

• Amaldoss, W., & Jain, S. (2008). Research note-trading up: A strategic analysis of reference group effects. Marketing Science, 27, 932–942.10.1287/mksc.1070.0350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. R., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1984). Stage of the product life cycle, business strategy, and business performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 5–24.10.2307/255954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkes, H., & Shaffer, V. (2009). Preference reversals in evaluations of cash versus non-cash incentives. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 859–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckwith, N. E., & Lehmann, D. R. (1975). The importance of halo effects in multi-attribute attitude models. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 265–275.10.2307/3151224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthon, P. R., Leyland, F. P., Plangger, K., & Shapiro, D. (2012). Marketing meets Web 2.0, social media, and creative consumers: Implications for international marketing strategy. Business Horizons, 55, 261–271.10.1016/j.bushor.2012.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, J. G., Green, D. P., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550–558.10.1037/a0018933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.10.1037/h0046016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, R. E., & Curry, D. J. (2010). Transparent pricing: Theory, tests, and implications for marketing practice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 759–774.10.1007/s11747-010-0189-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran, S., & Morwitz, V. G. (2005). Effects of participative pricing on consumers’ cognitions and actions: A goal theoretic perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 249–259.10.1086/432234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernev, A. (2003). When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 170–183.10.1086/jcr.2003.30.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemons, E. K. (2009). Business models for monetizing internet applications and web sites: Experience, theory, and predictions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 15–41.10.2753/MIS0742-1222260202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloninger, C. R. (1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 573–588.10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180093014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creusen, M. E., & Schoormans, J. P. (2005). The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 63–81.10.1111/jpim.2005.22.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawar, N., & Sarvary, M. (1997). The signaling impact of low introductory price on perceived quality and trial. Marketing Letters, 8, 251–259.10.1023/A:1007963128115
   Google Scholar
• Deshpande, R. (1983). “Paradigms lost”: On theory and method in research in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 47, 101–110.10.2307/1251403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Developer Economics. (2014). Q1 2014: State of the developer nation. Retrieved from http://www.developereconomics.com/reports/q1-2014/
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1977). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Towards an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gershoff, A. D., & Frels, J. K. (2015). What makes it green? The role of centrality of green attributes in evaluations of the greenness of products. Journal of Marketing, 79, 97–110.10.1509/jm.13.0303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, J., Lehmann, D. R., & Mazursky, D. (2001). The idea itself and the circumstances of its emergence as predictors of new product success. Management Science, 47, 69–84.10.1287/mnsc.47.1.69.10670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google Inc. (2014). Form 10-K, 2013 Annual Report. Retrieved from https://investor.google.com/pdf/20131231_google_10 K.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J., Kutzner, F., & Wänke, M. (2013). Money and thinking: Reminders of money trigger abstract construal and shape consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 1154–1166.10.1086/667691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924–936.10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 283–295.10.1086/jcr.1980.7.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93.
   Google Scholar
• Kardes, F. R. (1996). In defense of experimental consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5, 279–296.10.1207/s15327663jcp0503_04
   Google Scholar
• Kassarjian, H. H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 8–18.10.1086/jcr.1977.4.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassarjian, H. H. (1983). Social values and the Sunday comics: A content analysis. In R. P. Bagozzi, & A. M. Tybout (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 10, pp. 434–438). Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kempf, D. S., & Smith, R. E. (1998). Consumer processing of product trial and the influence of prior advertising: A structural modeling approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 325–338.10.2307/3152031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. Y., Natter, M., & Spann, M. (2009). Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism. Journal of Marketing, 73, 44–58.10.1509/jmkg.73.1.44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, A., & Misra, K. (2014). Pricing online content: Fee or free? Unpublished Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, A., Goldfarb, A., Bonatti, A., Ghose, A., Goldstein, D. G., Lewis, R., … Yao, S. (2014). How do firms make money selling digital goods online? Marketing Letters, 25, 331–341.10.1007/s11002-014-9310-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L., Lee, M. P., Bertini, M., Zauberman, G., & Ariely, D. (2015, April). Money, time, and the stability of consumer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 194–199.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 153–174.10.1257/jep.21.2.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., & Pirlott, A. G. (2015). Statistical approaches for enhancing causal interpretation of the M to Y relation in mediation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 30–43.10.1177/1088868314542878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 39–54.10.1086/jcr.1989.16.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. S., Wakslak, C. J., & Krishnan, V. (2014). Construing creativity: The how and why of recognizing creative ideas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 81–87.10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muncy, J. A., & Eastman, J. K. (1998). Materialism and consumer ethics: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 137–145.10.1023/A:1005723832576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, A., Mahajan, V., & Bronnenberg, B. (2003). Advertising versus pay-per-view in electronic media. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20, 13–30.10.1016/S0167-8116(02)00119-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford, S. K., & Bloch, P. H. (2011). Linking innovation to design: Consumer responses to visual product newness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 208–220.10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00871.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaswamy, S. (2015, April 8). Outside voices: Why mobile advertising may be all about micro-targeting moments. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved September 2, 2015, from http://blogs.wsj.com/cmo/2015/04/08/outside-voices-why-mobile-advertising-may-be-all-about-micro-targeting-moments/
   Google Scholar
• Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1989). The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perceptions of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 351–357.10.2307/3172907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shampanier, K., Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2007). Zero as a special price: The true value of free products. Marketing Science, 26, 742–757.10.1287/mksc.1060.0254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soman, D. (2001). The mental accounting of sunk time costs: Why time is not like money. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 169–185.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spann, M., & Tellis, G. J. (2006). Does the internet promote better consumer decisions? The case of name-your-own-price auctions. Journal of Marketing, 70, 65–78.10.1509/jmkg.2006.70.1.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851.10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiller, S. A., Fitzsimons, G. J., Lynch, J. G., & McClelland, G. H. (2013). Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research, 50, 277–288.10.1509/jmr.12.0420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sujan, M., & Dekleva, C. (1987). Product categorization and inference making: Some implications for comparative advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 372–378.10.1086/jcr.1987.14.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Tang, T. L. (1995). The development of a short money ethic scale: Attitudes toward money and pay satisfaction revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 809–816.10.1016/S0191-8869(95)00133-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellis, G. J. (1986). Beyond the many faces of price: An integration of pricing strategies. Journal of Marketing, 50, 146–160.10.2307/1251292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199–214.10.1287/mksc.4.3.199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong, Y., Klink, R. R., Fort-Rioche, L., & Athaide, G. A. (2014). Consumer response to product form in technology-based industries. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 867–876.10.1111/jpim.2014.31.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314, 1154–1156.10.1126/science.1132491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. A., da Costa Hernandez, J. M., Sundar, A., Dinsmore, J., & Kardes, F. R. (2013). If it tastes bad it must be good: Consumer naïve theories and the marketing placebo effect. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30, 197–198.10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zauberman, G., & Lynch, J. G. (2005). Resource slack and propensity to discount delayed investments of time versus money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 23–37.10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar