A conceptual analysis of brand intimacy on social media platforms

References

• Albert, N., & Merunka, D. (2013). The role of brand love in consumer-brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30, 258–266.10.1108/07363761311328928
   Google Scholar
• Albert, N., Merunka, D., & Valette-Florence, P. (2008). When consumers love their brands: Exploring the concept and its dimensions. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1062–1075.10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Amar, M. (2014). The evolution of generosity marketing and three trends today. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/onmarketing/2014/05/28/the-evolution-of-generosity-marketing-and-three-trends-today/#4ef8608e4d52
   Google Scholar
• Bagchi, M., Murdoch, S., & Scanlan, J. (2015). The state of global media spending. Mckinsey&Company. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/media-and-entertainment/our-insights/the-state-of-global-media-spending
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23, 45–61.10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bane, C. M., Haymaker, C., & Zinchuk, J. (2005). Social support as a moderator of the big-fish-in-a-little-pond effect in online self-help support groups. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 10, 239–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, A., & Gluck-Ofri, O. (2007). Degree and reciprocity of self-disclosure in online forums. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 407–417.10.1089/cpb.2006.9938
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batra, R., Ahuvia, A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2012). Brand love. Journal of Marketing, 76, 1–16.10.1509/jm.09.0339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Bratslavsky, E. (1999). Passion, intimacy, and time: Passionate love as a function of change in intimacy. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 3, 49–67.10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bazarova, N. N., & Choi, Y. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64, 635–657.10.1111/jcom.2014.64.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandtzæg, P. B., Luders, M., & Skjetne, J. H. (2010). Too many Facebook ‘friends’? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26, 1006–1030.10.1080/10447318.2010.516719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66, 105–114.10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, B., & Ahuvia, A. (2006). Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing Letters, 17, 79–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. W., & Li, S. Y. (2010). Understanding consumer-to-consumer interactions in virtual communities: The salience of reciprocity. Journal of Business Research, 63, 1033–1040.10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. H., & Wang, I. C. (2008). An investigation of user communication behavior in computer mediated environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2336–2356.10.1016/j.chb.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, P. L., & Chieng, M. H. (2006). Building consumer–brand relationship: A cross-cultural experiential view. Psychology & Marketing, 23, 927–959.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudoir, S. R., & Fisher, J. D. (2010). The disclosure processes model: Understanding disclosure decision making and postdisclosure outcomes among people living with a concealable stigmatized identity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 236–256.10.1037/a0018193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Fay, S., & Wang, Q. (2011). The role of marketing in social media: How online consumer reviews evolve. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25, 85–94.10.1016/j.intmar.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. H., & Bazarova, N. N. (2015). Self-disclosure characteristics and motivations in social media: Extending the functional model to multiple social network sites. Human Communication Research, 41, 480–500.10.1111/hcre.2015.41.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457–475.10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derlega, V. J., & Grzelak, J. (1979). Appropriateness of self-disclosure. In G. J. Chelune (Ed.), Self-disclosure: Origins, patterns and implications of openness in interpersonal relationships (pp. 151–176). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self‐construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 378–389.10.1086/jcr.2005.32.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 343–353.10.1086/jcr.1998.24.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargie, O. (2004). Skilled interpersonal communication. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, M. (2013). Brand communities of Facebook: How do they create value? ( Doctoral thesis). Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, M., Mydock, S., Pervan, S. J., & Kortt, M. (2016). Facebook, self-disclosure, and brand-mediated intimacy: Identifying value creating behaviors. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15, 493–502.10.1002/cb.v15.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, D., Albrecht, C. M., & Bauer, H. H. (Eds.). (2012). Love actually? Measuring and exploring consumers’ brand love. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, D., Bauer, H., & Mühl, J. (2008). Measuring brand love: Applying Sternberg’s triangular theory of love in consumer-brand relations. Paper presented at the 2008 Australian & New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, University of Western Sydney, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., Wood, J. F., Smith, V., & Westbrook, N. (2004). Friendships through IM: Examining the relationship between instant messaging and intimacy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, 38–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ind, N., Iglesias, O., & Schultz, M. (2013). Building brands together: Emergence and outcomes of co-creation. California Management Review, 55, 5–26.10.1525/cmr.2013.55.3.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L. C., Bazarova, N. N., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). The disclosure-intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: An attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Communication Research, 37, 58–77.10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68.10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keh, H. T., Pang, J., & Peng, S. (2007). Understanding and measuring brand love. In J. R. Priester (Ed.), Proceedings of advertising and consumer psychology (pp. 84–88). Santa Monica, CA: Society for Consumer Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Khoury, J. (2013). Why do we love brands? Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/gyro/2013/05/06/why-do-we-love-brands/#4608767478a1
   Google Scholar
• Kietzmann, J. H., & Angell, I. (2010). Panopticon revisited. Communications of the ACM, 53, 135–138.10.1145/1743546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54, 241–251.10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeldskov, J., Gibbs, M., Vetere, F., Howard, S., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K., & Bunyan, M. (2004). Using cultural probes to explore mediated intimacy. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 11, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, H., & Kuo, F. (2009). Can blogging enhance subjective well-being through self-disclosure? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 75–79.10.1089/cpb.2008.016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 61–72.10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, Y., & Feng, L. (2013). Relationships among community interaction characteristics, perceived benefits, community commitment, and oppositional brand loyalty in online brand communities. International Journal of Information Management, 33, 948–962.10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labrecque, L. I. (2014). Fostering consumer–brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28, 134–148.10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laroche, M., Habibi, M. R., Richard, M. O., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2012). The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1755–1767.10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurenceau, J., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 1238–1251.10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 314–323.10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaper, A. (2011). Enhancing customer intimacy. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/sap/2011/08/25/enhancing-customer-intimacy/#6581e4497740.
   Google Scholar
• Mateus, S. (2010). Public intimacy. Sphera Pública, 10, 57–70.
   Google Scholar
• McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66, 38–54.10.1509/jmkg.66.1.38.18451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monga, A. B. (2002). Brand as a relationship partner: Gender differences in perspectives. Advances in Consumer Research, 29, 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self‐disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 323–339.10.1086/jcr.2000.26.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman, C. (2016). Social media spending triples but falls short of expectations. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/christinemoorman/2016/08/23/social-media-spending-triples-but-falls-short-of-expectations/#76b707177cff
   Google Scholar
• Muniz, A. M., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 412–432.10.1086/319618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omarzu, J. (2000). A disclosure decision model: Determining how and when individuals will self-disclose. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 4, 174–185.10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, C. E. (2004). A typology of virtual communities: A multi-disciplinary foundation for future research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, 54–68.
   Google Scholar
• Posey, C., Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T. L., & Ellis, T. S. (2010). Proposing the online community self-disclosure model: The case of working professionals in France and the UK who use online communities. European Journal of Information Systems, 19, 181–195.10.1057/ejis.2010.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–389). England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. (2004). Lovemarks. Standford Management Institute, Business Book Summaries. Retrieved from http://qcseminars.com/wp-content/themes/SuperQC/images/LoveMarks.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, A., Ponnam, A., & Murthy, B. K. (2012). Understanding and measuring romantic brand love. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 11, 325–348.
   Google Scholar
• Scarpi, D. (2010). Does size matter? An examination of small and large web-based brand communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24, 14–21.10.1016/j.intmar.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schau, H. J., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 385–404.10.1086/378616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimp, T. A., & Madden, T. J. (1988). Consumer-object relations: A conceptual framework based analogously on Sternberg’s triangular theory of love. Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 163–168.
   Google Scholar
• Sibilia, P. (2008). La intimidad como espectáculo [Intimacy as a show]. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S., & Hendrick, S. S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 857–877.10.1521/jscp.23.6.857.54803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tello, L. (2013). Intimacy and «extimacy» in social networks: Ethical boundaries of Facebook. Comunicar, 21, 205–213.10.3916/C41-2013-20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorbjørnsen, H., Supphellen, M., Nysveen, H., & Pedersen, P. (2002). Building brand relationships online: A comparison of two interactive applications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16, 17–34.10.1002/dir.10034
   Google Scholar
• Tolstedt, B. E., & Stokes, J. P. (1983). Relation of verbal, affective, and physical intimacy to marital satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 573–580.10.1037/0022-0167.30.4.573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2012). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Turri, A. M., Smith, K. H., & Kemp, E. (2013). Developing affective brand commitment through social media. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 14, 201–2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetere, F., Gibbs, M. R., Kjeldskov, J., Howard, S., Mueller, F. F., Pedell, S., Bunyan, M. (2005). Mediating intimacy: Designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships. Paper presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland.
   Google Scholar
• Vlachos, P. A., & Vrechopoulos, A. P. (2012). Consumer–retailer love and attachment: Antecedents and personality moderators. Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services, 19, 218–228.10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Wirtz, J., Den Ambtman, A., Bloemer, J., Horváth, C., Ramaseshan, B., Van De Klundert, J., & Kandampully, J. (2013). Managing brands and customer engagement in online brand communities. Journal of Service Management, 24, 223–244.10.1108/09564231311326978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yohn, D. (2014). Great brands aim for customers’ hearts, not their wallets. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/onmarketing/2014/01/08/great-brands-aim-for-customers-hearts-not-their-wallets/#b787f463f451
   Google Scholar