The open method of co‐ordination and ‘post‐regulatory’ territorial cohesion policy

References

• Albrechts , L , Healey , P and Kunzmann , KR . (2003) . Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe . Journal of the American Planning Association , 69 (2) : pp. 113–129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzuini A Strubelt W (Ed) 2001 Kriterien für die räumliche Differenzierung des EU‐Territoriums: Kulturerbe, Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung Forschungen Heft 100.1, Bonn
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson , R . (2002) . The White Paper on European Governance: Implications for Urban Policy . European Planning Studies , 10 (6) : pp. 781–792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnier M (2002) Postface in Husson C (2002) L'Europe sans territoire: Essay sur le concept de cohesion territoriale, Paris, DATAR/éditions de l'aube pp. 201–203
   Google Scholar
• Börzel TA (2002) States and Regions in the European Union: Institutional Adaptation in Germany and Spain Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• CEC – Commission of the European Communities (1993) Growth, Competitiveness and Employment (COM (93) 700) Brussels
   Google Scholar
• CEC – Commission of the European Communities (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
   Google Scholar
• CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2001a) European Governance: A White Paper, Communication from the Commission, COM(2001) 428 Brussels
   Google Scholar
• CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2001b) Communication from the Commission: A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development (Commission's proposal to the Gothenburg European Council). COM(2001) 264 final. Brussels
   Google Scholar
• CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2003a) Second Progress Report on Economic and Social Cohesion, Communication from the Commission COM(2003)/4. Brussels
   Google Scholar
• CEC – Commission of the European CommunitiesDG Research (2003b) Third European Report on Science & Technology Indicators Brussels
   Google Scholar
• CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2004) A New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation – Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion (Communication from the Commission COM/2004/107). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
   Google Scholar
• Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States (2004) Provisional consolidated version of the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe CIG 86/04, Brussels, 25 June (http://ue.eu.int/igcpdf/en/04/cg00/cg00086.en04.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Copus , AK . (2001) . From core‐periphery to polycentric development: Concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality . European Planning Studies , 9 (4) : pp. 539–552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoR – Committee of the Regions (2002) Territorial Cohesion in Europe (Draft Final Report), CoR Studies E‐6/2002, Brussels
   Google Scholar
• Cram L (1997) Policy‐making in the European Union: Conceputal Lenses and the Integration Process (European Public Policy Series) London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi , S . (2003) . Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda . European Planning Studies , 11 (8) : pp. 979–999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EP – European Parliament (2002) Report on the First Progress Report from the Commission on Economic and Social Cohesion (COM(2002)46‐C5‐0198/2002–2002/2094(COS)) Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism; Rapporteur Elisabeth Schroedter, European Parliament 1999–2004 Session Document, Final A5‐0354/2002.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi A (1997) A roving band of planners in Faludi A Zonneveld W (Eds.) Shaping Europe: The European Spatial Development Perspective (Special Issue, Built Environment) 23 (4) pp. 281–287
   Google Scholar
• Faludi , A . (2002) . Positioning European spatial planning . European Planning Studies , 10 (7) : pp. 897–909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi A (2003) Unfinished business: European spatial planning in the 2000s in Faludi A (Ed) The Application of the European Spatial Development Perspective (Special Issue), Town Planning Review 74 (1) pp. 1–9
   Google Scholar
• Faludi , A . (2004) . Territorial cohesion – Old (French) wine in new bottles? . Urban Studies , 41 (7) : pp. 1349–1365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi A Waterhout B (2002) The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No Masterplan (The RTPI Library Series) London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Faludi A Zonneveld W Waterhout B (2000) The Committee on Spatial Development: Formulating a spatial perspective in an institutional vacuum in Christiansen T Kirchner E (Eds.) Committee Governance in the European Union Manchester University Press pp. 115–131
   Google Scholar
• Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (2001) Spatial Development and Spatial Planning in Germany Bonn
   Google Scholar
• Gore , T . (2004) . The Open Method of Coordination and Policy Mainstreaming: The European Employment Strategy and Regional Conversion Programmes in the UK . European Planning Studies , 12 (1) : pp. 123–141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier , A . (1997) . Policy‐Making by Subterfuge: Interest Accommodation, Innovation and Substitute Democratic Legitimation in Europe – Perspectives from Distinctive Policy Areas . Journal of European Public Policy , 4 (2) : pp. 171–89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson , D and Maher , I . (2001) . The open method as a new mode of Governance: The case of soft economic policy co‐ordination . Journal of Common Market Studies , 39 (4) : pp. 719–746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krätke , S . (2001) . Strengthening the Polycentric Urban System in Europe: Conclusions from the ESDP . European Planning Studies , 9 (1) : pp. 105–116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosher , JS and Trubek , DM . (2003) . Alternative approaches to governance in the EU: EU social policy and the European Employment Strategy . Journal of Common Market Studies , 41 (1) : pp. 63–88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordregio (2000) Study Programme on European Spatial Planning: Conclusions and Recommendations Nordregio R2000:4, Stockholm
   Google Scholar
• Nugent N (1999) (4th edition) The Government and Politics of the European Union Basingstoke: Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Pallagst KM (2000) Raumordnung der Tschechischen Republik: Mittel‐ und Osteuropa vor dem Hintergrund europäischer Raumordnungsbestrebungen Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz GmbH
   Google Scholar
• Peters , D . (2003) . Cohesion, polycentricity, missing links and bottlenecks: Conflicting spatial storylines for pan‐European transport investments . European Planning Studies , 11 (3) : pp. 317–339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porte C, de la Pochet P (2002a) Supple co‐ordination at EU level and the key actors' involvement in Porte C, de la Pochet P (Eds.) Building Social Europe through the Open Method of Co‐ordination P.I.E.‐Peter Lande, Brussels, Bern, Berlin, Frankfurt/M., New York, Oxford, Wien pp. 27–68
   Google Scholar
• Porte C, de la Pochet P (2002b) Conclusions in Porte C, de la Pochet P (Eds.) Building Social Europe through the Open Method of Co‐ordination P.I.E.‐Peter Lande, Brussels, Bern, Berlin, Frankfurt/M., New York, Oxford, Wien pp. 285–300
   Google Scholar
• Ritter , E‐H . (2003) . Zur territorialen Dimension in der Europäischen Verfassung . ZSE: Zeitschrift für Staats‐ end Europawissenschaften , 1 (2) : pp. 240–250
   Google Scholar
• Ritter E‐H Benz A David C‐H Faludi A Schmidt‐Aßmann E Wahl R (2003) Raumentwicklungspolitik im Europäischen Verfassungsvertrag: Positionspapier aus der Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (Studies in Spatial Development 3) Hanover
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf F (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford University Press: Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke , F . (2002) . Social justice and open coordination in Europe: Reflections on Drèze's Tinbergen Lecture . De Economist , 150 : pp. 83–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterhout B (2002) Polycentric development: What is behind it? in Faludi A (Ed.) European Spatial Planning Cambridge MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy pp. 83–103
   Google Scholar
• Wegener M Eskelinen H Fürst F Schürmann C Spiekermann K (2001) Criteria for the Spatial Differentiation of the EU Territory: Geographical Position (Study Programme on European Spatial Planning; Forschungen, Heft 102.2) Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning, Bonn
   Google Scholar
• Williams RH (1996) European Union Spatial Policy and Planning London: Chapman Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Zeitlin J Trubek DM (Eds.) (2003) Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar