506
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
EUROPEAN BRIEFING

Engaging in European Spatial Planning: A Central and Eastern European Perspective on the Territorial Cohesion Debate

, &
Pages 1197-1220 | Received 01 Oct 2010, Accepted 01 Feb 2012, Published online: 09 May 2012

References

  • Adams , N. 2008 . Convergence and policy transfer: An examination of the extent to which approaches to spatial planning have converged within the context of an enlarged EU . International Planning Studies , 13 ( 1 ) : 31 – 50 .
  • Adams , N. , Cotella , G. and Nunes , R. 2011 . Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge an Policy Development in an Enlarged EU , London : Routledge .
  • Adams , N. , Cotella , G. and Nunes , R. forthcoming . The engagement of territorial knowledge communities with European spatial planning and the territorial cohesion debate: A Baltic perspective . European Planning Studies ,
  • Bachtler, J. (Ed.) (1992) Socio Economic Situation and Development of the Regions in the Neighbouring Countries of the Community in Central and Eastern Europe, Report to the European Commission, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Barca, F. (2009) An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations, Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy, Brussels: DG-Regio.
  • Böhme , K. , Richardson , T. , Dabinett , G. and Jensen , O. B. 2004 . Values in a vacuum? Towards an integrated multi-level analysis of the governance of European space . Journal of European Planning Studies , 12 ( 8 ) : 1175 – 1188 .
  • Böhme, K., Doucet, P., Komornicki, T., Zaucha, J. & Światek, D. (2011) How to Strengthen the Territorial Dimension of “Europe 2020” and EU Cohesion Policy, Report based on the Territorial Agenda 2020, prepared at the request of the Polish EU Presidency (Warsaw: Polish Ministry of Regional Development).
  • Brunet , R. 1989 . Les Villes “Européennes”. Rapport pour la DATAR , Paris : RECLUS/DATAR .
  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities) . 1991 . Europe 2000: Outlook for the Development of the Community's Territory , Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
  • CEC . 1994 . Europe 2000+: Cooperation for European Territorial Development , Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
  • CEC . 1996 . The Impact of the Development of the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe on the Community Territory , Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
  • CEC . 1999 . European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU , Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
  • CEC . 2005 . Cohesion Policy in Support of Growth and Jobs: Community Strategic Guidelines, 2007–2013 , Brussels : Commission of the European Communities .
  • CEC . 2007 . Growing Regions, Growing Europe—Fourth Report on Economic and Social Cohesion , Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
  • CEC . 2008 . Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion—Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength , Brussels : Commission of the European Communities .
  • Conzelmann, T. (1998) Europeanization of regional development policies? Linking multi-level governance approach with theories of policy learning and policy change, European Integration Online Papers, 2(4). Available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1998–004a.htm (accessed 18 January 2011).
  • Cotella, G. (2009) Governance territoriale comunitaria e sistemi di pianificazione: Riflessioni sull'allargamento ad est dell'Unione europea, PhD dissertation, Inter-university Department of Territorial Studies and Planning, Politecnico di Torino, Torino.
  • Dabrowski , M. 2011 . “ Institutional change, partnership and regional networks: Civic engagement and the implementation of the structural funds in Poland ” . In Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU , Edited by: Adams , N. , Cotella , G. and Nunes , R. 205 – 228 . London : Routledge .
  • Davoudi , S. 2006 . Evidence-based planning: Rhetoric and reality . disP , 165 ( 2 ) : 14 – 24 .
  • DE Presidency (2007) Territorial Agenda of the European Union: Towards a More Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions, Agreed on the occasion of the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion on 24/25 May 2007. Available at http://www.bmvbs.de/Anlage/original_1005295/Territorial-Agenda-of-the-European-Union-Agreed-on-25-May-2007-accessible.pdf (accessed 25 September 2010).
  • Duhr , S. , Colomb , C. and Nadin , V. 2010 . European Spatial Planning and Territorial Co-operation , London : Routledge .
  • ESPON . 2006 . Territory Matters for Competitiveness and Cohesion , Luxembourg : ESPON .
  • ESPON (2009) Territorial cooperation in transnational areas and across internal/external borders, Call for Proposals for Targeted Analyses—Specifications. Available at http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/AppliedResearch/TERCO/Project_specification.pdf (accessed 18 January 2011).
  • ESPON (2010) Metropolisation and Polycentric Development in Central Europe: Evidence Based Strategic Options, Call for Proposals for Targeted Analyses—Specifications. Available at http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/TargetedAnalyses/POLYCE/PS-P2_POLYCE-FINAL-14-04-2010.pdf (accessed 18 January 2011).
  • ESPON (2011) ESPON Projects. Overview by November 2011 (Luxembourg: ESPON).
  • ESPON (no date) ESPON Website. Available at www.espon.eu (accessed 25 September 2010).
  • Evers , D. 2007 . Reflections on territorial cohesion and European spatial planning . Tijdschrift vor Economische en Sociale Geografie , 99 ( 3 ) : 303 – 315 .
  • Evers , D. , Tennekes , J. , Borsboom , J. , van den Heiligenberg , H. and Thissen , M. 2009 . A Territorial Impact Assessment of Territorial Cohesion for the Netherlands , Den Hag : Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency .
  • Faludi, A. (2000) Strategic planning in Europe: Institutional aspects, in: W. Salet & A. Faludi (Eds) The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning, pp. 243–258 (Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences).
  • Faludi , A. 2001 . The application of the European spatial development perspective: Evidence from the North-West metropolitan area . European Planning Studies , 9 ( 5 ) : 663 – 675 .
  • Faludi , A. 2008 . The learning machine: European integration in the planning mirror . Environment and Planning A , 40 ( 6 ) : 1470 – 1484 .
  • Faludi , A. 2009 . A turning point in the development of European spatial planning? The Territorial Agenda of the European Union and the first action programme . Progress in Planning , 71 ( 1 ) : 1 – 42 .
  • Faludi , A. 2011 . Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age? , London : Routledge .
  • Faludi , A. and Waterhout , B. 2002 . The Making of the European Development Perspective—No Masterplan , London : Routledge .
  • Faludi , A. and Waterhout , B. 2006 . Introducing evidence-based planning . disP , 165 ( 2 ) : 4 – 13 .
  • Finka , M. 2011 . “ Evolving frameworks for regional development and spatial planning in the new regions of the EU ” . In Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU , Edited by: Adams , N. , Cotella , G. and Nunes , R. 103 – 122 . London : Routledge .
  • Fritsch , M. 2011 . “ Interfaces of European Union internal and external territorial governance: The Baltic Sea region ” . In Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU , Edited by: Adams , N. , Cotella , G. and Nunes , R. 382 – 401 . London : Routledge .
  • Gorzelak , G. 1996 . The Regional Dimension of Transformation in Central Europe , London : Regional Studies Association .
  • GRP (Government of the Republic of Poland) (2009) Annex to the Position of the Government on the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee: Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion—Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength (Warsaw: Government of the Republic of Poland). Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/consultation/terco/pdf/2_national/12_2_poland_en.pdf (accessed 25 September 2010).
  • Haas , P. 1992 . Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy co-ordination . International Organization , 46 ( 1 ) : 1 – 35 .
  • Hall , P. and Taylor , R. 1996 . Political science and the three new institutionalisms . Political Studies , 44 ( 5 ) : 936 – 957 .
  • Haughton , G. , Allmendinger , P. , Counsell , D. and Vigar , G. 2010 . The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries , London : Routledge .
  • HU Presidency (2011) Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020. Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions, Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers Responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19 May 2011 Gödöllő, Hungary. Available at http://www.eu2011.hu/files/bveu/documents/TA2020.pdf (accessed 18 January 2011).
  • Husson , C. 2002 . L'Europe sans territoire: Essai sur le concept de cohésion territoriale , Paris : Datar/L'aube .
  • Janin Rivolin , U. and Faludi , A. 2005 . The hidden face of European spatial planning: Innovations in governance . European Planning Studies , 13 ( 2 ) : 195 – 215 .
  • Kingdon , J. W. 1995 . Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies , New York : Harper Collins .
  • Kule , L. , Krisjane , L. and Berzins , M. 2011 . “ The rhetoric and reality of pursuing territorial cohesion in Latvia ” . In Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU , Edited by: Adams , N. , Cotella , G. and Nunes , R. 291 – 319 . London : Routledge .
  • Kunzmann, K. & Wegener, M. (1991) The Pattern of Urbanisation in Western Europe 1960–1990, Report for the DG XVI of the European Commission as Part of the Study “Urbanisation and the Function of Cities in the European Community”, Dortmund: IRPUD.
  • Lave , J. and Wenger , E. 1991 . Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Lithuanian Ministry of Social Security and Labour (no date) Social Map of Lithuania. Available at http://www.socialiniszemelapis.lt/index.php?-1544055361 (accessed 18 January 2011).
  • Lowndes , V. 1996 . Varieties of new institutionalism: A critical appraisal . Public Administration , 74 ( 2 ) : 181 – 197 .
  • Maier , K. 2011 . “ The pursuit of balanced territorial development: The realities and complexities of the cohesion agenda ” . In Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU , Edited by: Adams , N. , Cotella , G. and Nunes , R. 266 – 290 . London : Routledge .
  • Majone , G. 1989 . Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process , Yale : Yale University Press .
  • Mehlbye , P. 2000 . Global integration zones—neighbouring metropolitan regions in metropolitan clusters . Informationen zur raumentwikslung , 11/12 : 755 – 762 .
  • Nunes, R., Adams, N. & Cotella, G. (2009) Policy “framing” and evidence-based planning: “Epistemic communities” in the multi-jurisdictional environment of an enlarged Europe. Paper presented at the 23rd AESOP Congress. Available at http://www.regional-studies-assoc.ac.uk/events/2009/apr-leuven-papers.asp (accessed 18 January 2011).
  • Pallagst, K. (2006) European spatial planning reloaded: considering EU enlargement in theory and practice, European Planning Studies, 14(2), pp. 253–272.
  • Pallagst , K. 2011 . “ The emergence of “epistemic communities” in the new European Landscape: Some theoretical implications for territorial development and the spatial agenda of the EU ” . In Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU , Edited by: Adams , N. , Cotella , G. and Nunes , R. 124 – 142 . London : Routledge .
  • Peterson, J. (2003) Policy Networks (Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies).
  • Peti , M. 2009 . Handbook on Territorial Cohesion , Edited by: Peti , M. Budapest : Ministry for National Development and Economy .
  • PL Presidency (2011a) Issue Paper. Territorial Dimension of EU Policies. Strategic Programming, Coordination and Institutions Territorially-Sensitive for an Efficient Delivery of the New Growth Agenda. “Who Does What and Where?”, Warsaw. Available at http://www.mrr.gov.pl/rozwoj_regionalny/Prezydencja/Kalendarz/Documents/Issue_Paper_Territorial_dimension_of_EU_policies.pdf (accessed 18 January 2011).
  • PL Presidency (2011b) Polish Presidency Conclusions on the Territorial Dimension of EU Policies and the Future Cohesion Policy. Towards an Integrated, Territorially Differentiated and Institutionally Smart Response to EU Challenges, 24th–25th November 2011, Poznań. Available at http://www.mrr.gov.pl/english/Presidency/Main/event_shedule/Documents/PRES_PL_Conclusions_final.pdf (accessed 18 January 2011).
  • PT Presidency (2007) First Action Programme for the Implementation of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union. Available at http://www.dgotdu.pt/rimotr/UE-doc/AP1_23NovembroVfinal.pdf (accessed 18 January 2011).
  • Sabatier , P. 1988 . An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein . Policy Sciences , 21 ( 2–3 ) : 129 – 168 .
  • Schön, P. (2000) Einführung – Das Europäische Raumentwicklungskonzept und die Raumordnung in Deutschland, Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 3/4, pp. I–VII.
  • Steinmo , S. , Thelen , K. and Longstreth , F. 1992 . Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Tewdwr-Jones , M. 2011 . “ Cohesion and competitiveness: The evolving context for European territorial development ” . In Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU , Edited by: Adams , N. , Cotella , G. and Nunes , R. 84 – 102 . London : Routledge .
  • Waterhout , B. 2008 . The Institutionalisation of European Spatial Planning , Amsterdam : IOS Press .
  • Waterhout , B. 2011 . “ European spatial planning: Current state and future challenges ” . In Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU , Edited by: Adams , N. , Cotella , G. and Nunes , R. 69 – 83 . London : Routledge .
  • Williams , R. H. 1996 . European Union Spatial Policy and Planning , London : Chapman .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.