Opening up the Compendium: An Evaluation of International Comparative Planning Research Methodologies

References

• Adams, N. (2008) Convergence and policy transfer: An examination of the extent to which approaches to spatial planning have converged within the context of an enlarged EU, International Planning Studies, 13(1), 31–49. doi: 10.1080/13563470801969608
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. & Haughton, G. (in press) The evolution and trajectories of English spatial governance: ‘Neoliberal’ episodes in planning, Planning Practice and Research.Doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.699223
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. A. (2001) Epilogue: Globalization and the city, In: H. Andersson, G. Jørgensen, D. Joye & W. Ostendorf (Eds) Change and Stability in Urban Europe, pp. 251–262 (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J. (1991) Review article: What is policy convergence and what causes it?, British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 215–233. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400006116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhme, K. (2003) Discursive European integration: The case of Nordic spatial planning, Town Planning Review, 74(1), 11–30. doi: 10.3828/tpr.74.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (1993) The cultural dimension in comparative research: Making sense of development control in France, European Planning Studies, 1(2), 217–219. doi: 10.1080/09654319308720210
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P., Breuillard, M., Fraser, C. & Paris, D. (2007) Spatial Planning Systems of Britain and France, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1991) Europe 2000: Outlook for the Development of the Community's Territory, (Luxembourg: Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1994) Europe 2000+ Cooperation for European Territorial Development, (Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1997) The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies, (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, B. & Nadin, V. (2006) Town and Country Planning in the UK, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H. W. E. (Ed.) (1989) Planning Control in Western Europe, (London: HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H. W. E. (1994) Towards a European planning system, Planning Practice and Research, 9(1), 63–69. doi: 10.1080/02697459408722911
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H. W. E., Edwards, D., Hooper, A. J. & Punter, J. V. (1989) Comparative study, In: Davies (Ed.) Planning Control in Western Europe, pp. 409–442 (London: HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A. (2005) Scenarios Baseline on Issues of Territorial Governance. Working Paper, ESPON Project 3.2. ESPON Coordination Unit, Esch-sur-Alzette.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S. (2007) The Visual Language of Spatial Planning: Exploring Cartographic Visualisations for Spatial Planning in Europe, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Colomb, C. & Nadin, V. (2010) European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Stead, D. & Zonneveld, W. (2007) The Europeanization of spatial planning through territorial cooperation, Planning Practice and Research, 22(3), 291–307. doi: 10.1080/02697450701688245
   Google Scholar
• Eser, T. W. & Konstadakopulos, D. (2000) Power shifts in the European Union? The case of spatial planning, European Planning Studies, 8(6), 783–798. doi: 10.1080/713666438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. & Waterhout, B. (2002) The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Farinós Dasí, J. (Ed.) (2006) ESPON Project 2.3.2: Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level. Final Report, Esch-sur-Alzette: ESPON Coordination Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Fürst, D. (2009) Planning cultures en route to a better comprehension of ‘planning processes’?, In: J. Knieling & F. Othengrafen (Eds) Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, pp. 23–38 (Farnham: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Galland, D. (2012) Understanding the reorientations and roles of spatial planning: The case of national planning policy in Denmark, European Planning Studies, 20(8), 1359–1392. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.680584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haintrais, L. (2009) International Comparative Research: Theory Methods and Practice, (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Hamedinger, A., Bartik, H. & Wolffhardt, A. (2008) The Impact of EU area-based programmes on local governance: Towards a ‘Europeanisation’?, Urban Studies, 45(13), 2669–2687. doi: 10.1177/0042098008098199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. & Williams, R. (1993) European urban planning systems: Diversity and convergence, Urban Studies, 30(4/5), 701–720. doi: 10.1080/00420989320081881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IGEAT and partners (2006) ESPON Project 3.2: Spatial Scenarios and Orientations in Relation to the ESDP and Cohesion Policy, Final Report, October 2006, Esch-sur-Alzette: ESPON Coordination Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. (2008) Conforming and performing planning systems in Europe: An unbearable cohabitation, Planning Practice and Research, 23(2), 167–186. doi: 10.1080/02697450802327081
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. & Faludi, A. (2005) The hidden face of European spatial planning: Innovations in governance, European Planning Studies, 13(2), 195–216. doi: 10.1080/0965431042000321785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knieling, J. & Othengrafen, F. (2009). In J. Knieling & F. Othengrafen (Ed.) Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Kule, L., Røsnes, A. E. (2010) Planning control on the Northern European Periphery, European Planning Studies, 18(12), 2027–2048. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2010.515821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. R. (2004) Unconditional surrender: The gradual demise of European diversity in planning, Keynote. Paper presented to the 18th AESOP Congress, Grenoble, 3 July. Available online at ww.planum.net/topics/documents/kunzmann_epp_01.pdf (accessed 1 July 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Maier, K. (2012) Europeanization and changing planning in East-Central Europe: An Easterner's view, Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 137–154. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661596
   Google Scholar
• Masser, I. (1984) Cross-national research: Some methodological considerations, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 11(2), 139–147. doi: 10.1068/b110139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadin, V. (2007) The emergence of spatial planning in England, Planning Practice and Research, 22(1), 43–62. doi: 10.1080/02697450701455934
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V. & Seaton, K. (2000) A comparison of environmental planning systems legislation in selected countries. Background paper for the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution study on environmental planning (Bristol: Centre for Environment and Planning, Faculty of the Built Environment, University of the West of England).
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V. & Stead, D. (2008) European spatial planning systems, social models and learning, disP—The Planning Review, 172(1), 35–47. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001
   Google Scholar
• Nedović-Budić, Z., Tsenkova, S. & Marcuse, P. (2006) The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe, In: S. Tsenkova & Z. Nedović-Budić (Eds) The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe, pp. 3–20 (Heidelberg/New York: Physica-Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P. & Thornley, A. (1996) Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems, and Planning Projects, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Othengrafen, F. (2010) Spatial planning as expression of culturised planning practices: The examples of Helsinki, Finland and Athens, Greece, Town Planning Review, 81(1), 83–110. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2009.25
   Google Scholar
• Oxley, M., Brown, T., Nadin, V., Qu, L., Tummers, L., Fernández-Maldonado, A. M. (2009) Review of European Planning Systems, (Fareham: National Housing and Planning Advice Unit).
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, D., Nadin, V. & Westlake, T. (1995) The compendium of European planning systems, European Planning Studies, 3(3), 390–395. doi: 10.1080/09654319508720313
   Google Scholar
• Steel, W. & Ruming, K. J. (2012) Flexibility versus certainty: Unsettling the land-use planning shibboleth in Australia, Planning Practice and Research, 27(2), 155–176. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.662670
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D., Minett, J., Hopkins, S., Hamnett, S., Faludi, A. & Barrel, D. (1983) Flexibility and Commitment in Planning, (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1997) The Methodology of the Social Sciences (translated and edited by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch). New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. H. (1984) Cross-national research: Translating theory into practice, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 11(2), 149–161. doi: 10.1068/b110149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, C. (2003) Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review 2nd, (Harlow: Longman).
   Google Scholar
• Zweigert, K. & H. Kötz, (translated by T. Weir) (1998) An Introduction to Comparative Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar