Self-Organization in Urban Regeneration: A Two-Case Comparative Research

References

• Allen, E. (2002). Starting to modernize; managing strategic service delivery partnerships. From governance to delivery (London: New Local Government Network).
   Google Scholar
• Alter, C. & Hage, J. (1993) Organizations Working Together, (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J. (2005) Institutional Implications of Interactive Governance: Insights from Dutch Practice, Governance, 18(1), pp. 111–134.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J. & Klijn, E. H. (2006) Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: A comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), pp. 417–446.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J. & van Meerkerk, I. F. (2011) Institutional evolution within local democracy: Local self-governance meets local government, in: J. Torfing & P. Triantafillou (Eds) Interactive policy-making, metagovernance and democracy, pp. 169–186 (Essex: ECPR Press).
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, B. & Boelens, L. (2011) Self-organisation in urban development: Towards a new perspective on spatial planning, Urban Research & Practice, 4(2), pp. 99–122.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, S., Thompson-Fawcett, M. (2007). Public participation and new urbanism: A conflicting agenda?, Planning Theory and Practice, 8(4), pp. 449–472. doi: 10.1080/14649350701664689
   Google Scholar
• Bor, J. (1990) Bergson en de onmiddelijke ervaring, Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University, Amsterdam: Boom.
   Google Scholar
• Broad Street Business Improvement District (2005a) A brighter, safer, cleaner Broad Street, published by the Broad Street Association and the Birmingham City Centre Partnership (Birmingham: Broad Street Business Improvement District).
   Google Scholar
• Broad Street Business Improvement District (2005b) BID update No.4 (Birmingham: Broad Street Business Improvement District).
   Google Scholar
• Broad Street Business Improvement District (2009) Enhancing — connecting developing — BID2 Renewal (Birmingham: Broad Street Business Improvement District).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. & Marshall, R. (2000). Public involvement and planning: Looking beyond the on to the many. International Planning Studies, 5(3), pp. 321–344. doi: 10.1080/713672862
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J. & Garg, S. (1997). The issue of governance in neighborhood-based initiatives. Urban Affairs Review, 32(5), pp. 631–661. doi: 10.1177/107808749703200502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P. (1998) Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• De Roo, G. & Silva, E. A. (2010) A Planner's Encounter with Complexity, (Ashgate: Farnham).
   Google Scholar
• Flood, R. L. (1999) Rethinking the Fifth Discipline: Learning Within the Unknowable, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, D., Shaw, P. & Stacey, R. D. (1999). Knowing and acting in conditions of uncertainty: A complexity perspective. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 12(3), pp. 295–309. doi: 10.1023/A:1022403802302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1995). The institutional challenge for sustainable urban regeneration. Cities, 12(4), pp. 221–230. doi: 10.1016/0264-2751(95)00043-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006). Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space. European Planning Studies, 14(3), pp. 299–320. doi: 10.1080/09654310500420792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylighen, F. (2001) The science of self-organization and adaptivity, in: L. D. Kiel (Ed) Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity. The Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. Oxford: Eolss Publishers. Available at http://www.eolss.net (accessed November 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory and Practice, 5(4), pp. 419–436. doi: 10.1080/1464935042000293170
   Google Scholar
• Jantsch, E. (1980) The Self-organizing Universe: Scientific and Human Implications of the Emerging Paradigm of Evolution, (Oxford: Pergamon Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, S. (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution, (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., Edelenbos, J. & Steijn, B. (2010) Trust in governance networks; its impact and outcomes, Administration and Society, 42(2), pp. 193–221.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems, (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. & O'Toole L. J. 2001. Managerial strategies and behaviour in networks: A model with evidence from U.S. public education, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), pp. 271–293.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, U. (1999). Organizational strategy on different landscapes: A new science approach. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 12(3), pp. 257–278. doi: 10.1023/A:1022499601393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morçöl, G. (2005). A new systems thinking: Implications of the science of complexity for public policy and administration. Public Administration Quarterly, 29(3), pp. 297–320.
   Google Scholar
• Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. (1984) Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature, (New York, NY: Bantam Books).
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. (2000). The evolution, definition and purpose of urban regeneration. In P. Roberts & H. Sykes (Eds) Urban Regeneration, A Handbook. British Urban Regeneration Association, pp. 9–36 (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. D. (1995). The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), pp. 477–495. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250160606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1998). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, pp. 86–109 (Thousand Oaks: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Statutory Instrument (2004) No. 2443 The Business Improvement Districts (England) Regulations 2004. Crown Copyright 2004. Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/2443/contents/made (accessed September 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H. & Skelcher, C. (2002) Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services, (New York, NY: Palgrave/Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Tandridge District Council (1998) Development Brief Caterham Barracks, (Oxted: Tandridge District Council).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2000). Communities in the lead: Power, organisational capacity and social capital. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), pp. 1019–1035. doi: 10.1080/00420980050011217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2007) Community participation in the real world: Opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces, Urban Studies, 44(2), pp. 297–317.
   Google Scholar
• Teisman, G. R. (2000). Models for research into decision-making processes: On phases, streams and decision-making rounds. Public Administration, 78(4), pp. 937–956. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisman, G. R., van Buuren, M. W. & Gerrits, L. G. (2009) Managing Complex Governance Systems, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Town and Country Planning Association (TCPA) (2007) Best Practice in Urban Extensions and New Settlements. A report on emerging good practice (Oldham: RAP Spiderweb).
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (1984) Case study research (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. (2007). Governance, complexity, and democratic participation: How citizens and public officials harness the complexities of neighbourhood decline. American Review of Public Administration, 37(1), pp. 17–50. doi: 10.1177/0275074006296208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2002) The competent boundary spanner, Public Administration, 80(1), pp. 103–124.
   Google Scholar