An Evaluation of Endogenous Sustainable Development Planning for the Rural–Urban Environment in Gran Canaria

References

• Allen, A. (2003) Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: Perspectives on an emerging field, Environment and Urbanization, 15(1), pp. 135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216–224. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, I. (1990) Ecological issues in urban design, Architectural Journal, 192, pp. 69–71.
   Google Scholar
• Caffyn, A. & Dahlstrom, M. (2005) Urban–rural interdependencies: Joining policy in practice, Regional Studies, 39(3), pp. 283–296. doi: 10.1080/0034340050086580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., Capello, R. & Nijkamp, P. (1996) Towards sustainable city policy: An economy-environment technology nexus, Ecological Economics, 24(1), pp. 103–118. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00032-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp. 128–152 Special issue: Technology, organizations, and innovation (March 1990). doi: 10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Errington, A. (1994) The peri-urban fringe: Europe's forgotten rural areas, Journal of Rural Studies, 10(4), pp. 367–375. doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(94)90046-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (1988) The future of rural society, COM (88), 371, Final, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. (1997) Planning for sustainability, Urban Design Quarterly, 64, Autumn, pp. 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. (2004) Towards participatory governance: Assessing the transformative possibilities, in: S. Hickey & G. Mohan (Eds) Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation, pp. 25–41 (London: Zed Books).
   Google Scholar
• Ghai, D. & Vivian, J. M. (1992) Grassroots Environmental Action: People's Participation in Sustainable Development (London, New York, Canada: Cab Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2009) Rurality and rural space: The ‘policy effect’ of the common agricultural policy in the borders of Scotland, Tracking Rural Change: Community, Policy and Technology in Australia, in: F. Merlan & D. Raftery (Eds) (The Australian National University), Australia, New Zealand and Europe, pp. 15–40 (Canberra: ANU E-Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gutman, P. (2007) Ecosystem services: Foundations for a new rural-urban compact, Ecological Economics, 62(3–4), pp. 383–387. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., Wright, R. E. & Adamowicz, V. (1998) Using choice experiments to value the environment: Design issues, current experience and future prospects, Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3–4), pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. (2006) Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda, Journal of Rural Studies, 22(2), pp. 142–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Hove, S. (2000) Participatory approaches to environmental policy-making: The European Commission climate change process as a case study, Ecological Economics, 33(3), pp. 457–472. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00165-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høyer, K. G., Næss, P. (2001) The ecological traces of growth: Economic growth, liberalization, increased consumption—and sustainable urban development?, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 3(2), pp. 177–192.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, J. & Zwerina, K. (1996) The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs, Journal of Marketing Research, 33(3), pp. 307–317. doi: 10.2307/3152127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A. & Stansbury, J. (2004) Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?, Public Administration Review, 64(1), pp. 55–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. & Burgess, J. (2005) Building partnership capacity for the collaborative management of marine protected areas in the UK: A preliminary analysis, Journal of Environmental Management, 77(3), pp. 227–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor, I. (2001) Towards participatory environmental management?, Journal of Environmental Management, 63(3), pp. 269–279. doi: 10.1006/jema.2001.0478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeuwis, C. (2000) Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: Toward a negotiation approach, Development and Change, 31(5), pp. 931–959. doi: 10.1111/1467-7660.00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. & Swait, J. (2000) Stated Choice Methods. Analysis and Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Low, N., Gleeson, B., Elander, I. & Lidskog, R. (Eds) (2000) Consuming Cities. The Urban Environment in the Global Economy after Rio (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F. & Sekia, F. (2003) Territorial innovation models: A critical survey, Regional Studies, 37(3), pp. 289–302. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000065442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, P., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2001) Evolutionary economic theories of sustainable development, Growth and Change, 32(1), pp. 110–134. doi: 10.1111/0017-4815.00152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parente, S. L. & Prescott, E. C. (2000) Barriers to Riches (Cambridge: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Parr, B. J. (2005) Perspectives on the city-region, Regional Studies, 39(5), pp. 555–566. doi: 10.1080/00343400500151798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J. D. & Long, A. (Eds) (1994) Born from Within: Practices and Perspectives on Endogenous Rural Development (Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum).
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, J. D. P., Renting, H., Brunori, G., Knickel, K., Mannion, J., Marsden, T., de Roest, K., Sevilla-Guzmán, E. & Ventura, F. (2000) Rural development: From practices and policies towards theory, Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4), pp. 391–408. doi: 10.1111/1467-9523.00156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Præstholm, S., Reenberg, A. & Kristensen, S. (2006) Afforestation of European landscapes: How do different farmer types respond to EU agri-environmental schemes?, Geojournal, 67(1), pp. 71–84. doi: 10.1007/s10708-006-9035-y
   Google Scholar
• Râmniceanua, I. & Ackrill, R. (2007) EU rural development policy in the new member states: Promoting multifunctionality?, Journal of Rural Studies, 23(4), pp. 416–429. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, C. (1999) Endogenous development in an era of reflexive modernity, Journal of Rural Studies, 15(3), pp. 257–267. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00072-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, C. (2006) Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU, in: P. J. Cloke, T. Marsden & P. H. Mooney (Eds) Handbook of Rural Studies, pp. 278–291 (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Renting, H., Rossing, W., Groot, J., van der Ploeg, J., Laurent, C., Perraud, D., Stobbelaar, D., Van Ittersum, M. (2009) Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework, Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2), pp. 112–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), pp. 1002–1037. doi: 10.1086/261420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseland, M. (2000) Sustainable community development: Integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives, Progress in Planning, 54(2), pp. 73–132. doi: 10.1016/S0305-9006(00)00003-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. & Pennington, M. (2000) Public participation and local environmental planning: The collective action problem and the potential of social capital, Local Environment, 5(2), pp. 153–169.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. (1999) New Perspectives on Economic Growth and Technological Innovation (WashingtonDC: Brookings Institution Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1961) The Theory of Economic Development (translation from German 1911 edition). (New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, A. (1998) Sustainable Rural Development (London: Cab Publishers)
   Google Scholar
• Stimson, R., Stough, R. R. & Nijkamp, P. (Eds) (2011) Endogenous Regional Development. Perspectives, Measurement and Empirical Investigation (Chelltenham: Edward Elgar)
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. (2002) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Uphoff, N. (1993) Grassroots organizations and NGOs in rural development: Opportunities with diminishing states and expanding markets, World Development, 21(4), pp. 607–622. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(93)90113-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentinov, V. (2008) Explaining the rise of rural governance in Europe, European Planning Studies, 16(8), pp. 1161–1165. doi: 10.1080/09654310802315856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandermeulen, V., Verspecht, A., Van Huylenbroeck, G., Meert, H., Boulanger, A., Van Hecke, E. (2006) The importance of the institutional environment on multifunctional farming systems in the peri-urban area of Brussels, Land Use Policy, 23(4), pp. 486–501. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Barquero, A. (2002) Endogenous Development: Networking, Innovation, Institutions, and Cities (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. (2001) Urban sprawl and natural areas encroachment: Linking land cover change and economic development in the Florida Everglades, Ecological Economics, 37(3), pp. 357–369. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00178-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wokoun, R., Kourilova, J., Pelucha, M. & Kveton, V. (2010) Prospective future trends in urban–rural relationships within the territorial agenda of the EU: A critical analysis of implementation with a special focus on the example of the Czech Republic, European Planning Studies, 18(11), pp. 1881–1896. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2010.512172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zasada, I. (2011) Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—a review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming, Land Use Policy, 28(4), pp. 639–648. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar