Territorial Keys for Bringing Closer the Territorial Agenda of the EU and Europe 2020

References

• Ahner, D. (2010) Regional policy, an integrated approach: A 360° view, Editorial, Panorama Magazine, 34, Summer, p. 3. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/panorama/pdf/mag34/mag34_en.pdf (accessed 1 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (1999) An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development, International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, 23(2), pp. 365–378. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R., Forslid, R., Ottaviano, P. M. G., & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2003) Economic Geography and Public Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009) An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/pdf/report_barca_v0306.pdf (accessed 9 April 212).
   Google Scholar
• Blažek, J. (2011) Balancing top-down and bottom-up approaches in the Czech Republic, in: Ministry of Regional Development (Ed.) Territorial Dimension of Development Policies, pp. 123–131 (Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development).
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K., Doucet, P., Komornicki, T., Zaucha, J., & Świątek, D. (2011) How to Strengthen the Territorial Dimension of “Europe 2020” and EU Cohesion Policy (Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development).
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Jessop, B., Jones, M. & Macleod, G. (2003) State/Space: A Reader, in: N. Brenner, Jessop, B., Jones, M. & Macleod, G.Malden: Blackwell Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (2008) Regional competitiveness: Towards a concept of territorial capital, in: R. Capello, R.P. Camagni, B. Chizzolini, & U. Fratesi (Eds) Modelling Regional Scenarios for the Enlarged Europe, pp. 33–47 (Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (2011) Local knowledge, national vision: Challenge and prospect for the EU regional policy, in: Ministry of Regional Development (Ed.) Territorial Dimension of Development Policies, pp. 75–84 (Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development).
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. R., Westley, F. & Turner, M. G. (2005) Surrogates for resilience of social–ecological systems, Ecosystems, 8(8), pp. 941–944. doi: 10.1007/s10021-005-0170-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damsgaard, O., Douce, T. P., Drahos, Z., Gere, L., Illés, I., Jetmar, M., Komornicki, T., Lopez, I., Péti, M., Prokai, R., Radvánszki, Á., Ricz, J., Salamin, G., Schmidt-Seiwert, V., Schön, P., Somfai, Á., Sütő, A., Tomay, K., Vanautgaerden, L. & Zaucha, J. (2011) The Territorial State and Perspectives of the European Union. Background document for the Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020 (Budapest: Hungarian Ministry of National Development and VÁTI Nonprofit Ltd).
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2005) Understanding territorial cohesion, Planning Practice and Research, 20(4), pp. 433–441. doi: 10.1080/02697450600767926
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2012) Resilience; a bridging concept or a dead end?, Planning Theory and Practice, Interface, 13(2), pp. 299–307. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Colomb, C. & Nadin, F. (2010) European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• EDORA. (2011) Annex 1. (Part C: Scientific Working Papers), Final Report, ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESDP (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union (Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2004) Transport services and networks: Territorial trends and basic supply of infrastructure for territorial cohesion, ESPON Project 1.2.1.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2001) Communication from the Commission. Services of General Interest in Europe. Brussels, 2001/C 17/04.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2008) Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee COM(2008) 616 final, Brussels, 6 October.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010a) Investing in Europe's Future. Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion, Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010b) Communication from the Commission. EUROPE 2020 A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, COM(2010) 2020 final, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2005) Territorial cohesion: An unidentified political objective. Introduction to the special issue, Town Planning Review, 76(1), pp. 1–13. doi: 10.3828/tpr.76.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Farole, T., Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Storper, M. (2009) Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, Geography, Institutions. Working Paper, London: London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, M., & Thisse, J.-F. (2002) Economics of Agglomeration, Cities, Industrial Location, and Regional Growth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, M., Krugman, P. & Venables, A. J. (2000) The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade (Cambridge: The MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hübner, D. (2011) Origin of territorial cohesion, Territorial Cohesion—Baltic Sea Region Examples. Baltic contribution to the Revised Territorial Agenda of EU, Ecoregion Perspectives. Baltic 21 Series No. 2, in: J. Zaucha6–7 (Berlin: s.Pro and Baltic 21).
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (1998) The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Knack, S. & Keefer, P. (1997) Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), pp. 1251–1288. doi: 10.1162/003355300555475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komornicki, T., & Silka, P. (Eds) (2011) Functional Linkages Between Polish Metropolises (Warsaw: Polish Academy of Science, Committee for Spatial Economy and Regional Planning).
   Google Scholar
• Komornicki, T., Śleszyński, P., Rosik, P. & Pomianowski, W. (2010) Dostępność przestrzenna jako przesłanka kształtowania polskiej polityki transportowej (Spatial Accessibility as a Background for Polish Transport Policy), Biuletyn KPZK 241, Komitet Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju PAN, 167, Warszawa [In Polish].
   Google Scholar
• Korcelli, P., Degórski, M., Drzazga, D., Komornicki, T., Markowski, T., Szlachta, J., Węcławowicz, G., Zalewski, J. & Zaucha, J. (2010) Ekspercki Projekt Koncepcji Przestrzennego zagospodarowania Kraju do roku 2033 (Polish spatial development concept 2033: An experts’ approach), Studia, vol. CXXVIII, Komitet Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju, Warszawa [In Polish].
   Google Scholar
• Matczak, R., Mikołajczyk, A. & Sobolew, M. (2010) Kierunki “terytorializacji” polityk publicznych w ramach procesu wdrażania Krajowej Strategii Rozwoju Regionalnego (Territorial dimensions of the public policies in the process of implementation of the national regional development strategy of Poland). Gdańsk [In Polish].
   Google Scholar
• Maury, C. (2007) What is the relevance of a territorialised approach to the link between knowledge and public action? Knowledge and policy in education and health sector. Available on http://knowandpol.eu/IMG/pdf/lr.tr.maury.eng.pdf (accessed 1 March 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Mccann, P. (2011) Brief notes on the major practical elements of commencing the design of an integrated and territorial place-based approach to Cohesion Policy, in: Ministry of Regional Development (Ed.) Territorial Dimension of Development Policies, pp. 67–71 (Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development).
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2011) Territorial Cohesion: A conceptual analysis. Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning (IGOT) Alameda da Universidade. Available on http://ww3.fl.ul.pt/pessoais/Eduardo_Medeiros/docs/PUB_PAP_EM_Territorial_Cohesion.pdf (accessed 4 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Molle, W. (2007) European Cohesion Policy (London: Routlege)
   Google Scholar
• MRR (2011) Territorial Dimension of EU Policy Strategic Programming, Coordination and Institutions Territorially-Sensitive for an Efficient Delivery of the New Growth Agenda. “Who Does What and Where?” (Warszawa: Ministry of Regional Development)
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2001) OECD Territorial Outlook (Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development)
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009) Investing for Growth: Building Innovative Regions, Background Report and Appendix to the Background Report, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2011) Regional Outlook 2011 (Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development)
   Google Scholar
• Overman, H. G. (2003) Can We Learn Anything From Economic Geography Proper? CEPDP, 586. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Puga, D. (1999) The rise and fall of regional inequalities, European Economic Review, 43(2), pp. 303–334. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00061-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, D. (2011) Integrated approach: From common myths to right balances, in: Ministry of Regional Development (Ed.) Territorial Dimension of Development Policies, pp. 150–157 (Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development).
   Google Scholar
• Samecki, P. (2009) Orientation paper on future cohesion policy. Available on http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/newsroom/pdf/pawel_samecki_orientation_paper.pdf (accessed 1 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Seravalli, G. (2009) Competitive European Regions Through Research and Innovation. Different Theoretical Approaches to Innovation Policies. Working Paper, Department of Economics Faculty of Economics, Parma: Università degli Studi di Parma.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M. (1997) The Regional Economy: Territorial Development in a Global Economy (London: Guilford Press)
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (1997) Neither global nor local: “Glocalization” and the politics of scale, Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local, in: K. R. Cox pp. 137–166 (New York, NY: Guilford Press).
   Google Scholar
• Szlachta, J. (2011) From theory to application: How to reinforce the territorial dimension in EU policies, Territorial Dimension of Development Policies, pp. 85–91 (Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development).
   Google Scholar
• Szlachta, J. & Zaucha, J. (2010) A New paradigm of the EU region al development in the context of the Poland's National Spatial Development Concepts, Regional Development and Regional Policy In Poland: First Experiences and New Challenges of the European Union Membership, Part 1, in: P. Churski & Ratajczak, W. pp. 153–171 (Warsaw: Polish Academy of Science, Committee for Spatial Economy and Regional Planning).
   Google Scholar
• Territorial Agenda. (2011) Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020—Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions—Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers Responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19th May, Hungary: Gödöllő. Available at http://www.eu-territorial-agenda.eu/ReferenceDocuments/FinalTA2020.pdf (accessed 5 April 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Tömmel, I. (1997) Europe and the regions: Towards a three-tier system or new modes of regulation, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 15(4), pp. 413–436. doi: 10.1068/c150413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trouve, A., Berrietsolliec, M. & Depres, C. (2007) Charting and theorising the territorialisation of agricultural Policy, Journal of Rural Studies, 23(4), pp. 443–452. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VASAB (1994) Towards a Framework for Spatial Development in the Baltic Sea Region (Denmark: Vision and Strategies Around the Baltic Sea 2010)
   Google Scholar
• Vogelij, J. (2010a) Spatial planning at the heart of Territorial Cohesion. Paper presented at the ECTP-CEU/RTPI/ESPON Conference: “How Can European Spatial Planners Assess Territorial Cohesion?” on 21 May 2010. Available on http://www.rtpi.org.uk/item/3553 (accessed 24 December 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Vogelij, J. (2010b) Fifteen Steps Towards Territorial Cohesion (Brussels: European Council of Spatial Planners).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2009) World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography (The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World BankWashington, DC).
   Google Scholar
• Zanon, B. (2010) Planning small regions in a larger Europe: Spatial planning as a learning process for sustainable local development, European Planning Studies, 18(12), pp. 2049–2072. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2010.515822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J. (2007) Rola przestrzeni w kształtowaniu relacji gospodarczych—ekonomiczne fundamenty planowania przestrzennego w Europie Bałtyckiej (The role of territory in enhancement of economic relations—Economic foundations of the spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region). Gdańsk: Uniwersytet Gdański [in Polish].
   Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J. & Szydarowski, W. (2011) O terytorializację polityki morskiej Polski. Potrzeba innowacyjnego podejścia (Towards territorialisation of the maritime policy of Poland. The need of innovative approach), Polskie drogi polityki morskiej - od wizji do działania (Polish approaches to maritime policy—from vision to action), in: J. ZauchaGdańsk: Instytut Morski w Gdańsku229–243 [In Polish].
   Google Scholar