Regional Innovation Policy and Innovative Behaviour: Looking for Additional Effects

References

• Acemoglu, D. (1997) Training and innovation in an imperfect labour market. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(3), pp. 445–464. doi: 10.2307/2971723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aerts, K. & Schmidt, T. (2008) Two for the price of one? Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany. Research Policy, 37(5), pp. 806–822. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afcha Chávez, S. (2011) Behavioural additionality in the context of regional innovation policy in Spain. Innovation: Management Policy and Practice, 13(1), pp. 95–110. doi: 10.5172/impp.2011.13.1.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonioli, D. & Marzucchi, A. (2012) Evaluating the additionality of innovation policy. A review focused on the behavioural dimension. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 9(2–4), pp. 124–148. doi: 10.1504/WRSTSD.2012.047685
   Google Scholar
• Antonioli, D., Bianchi, A., Mazzanti, M., Montresor, S. & Pini, P. (2011) Strategie di innovazione e risultati economici. Un'indagine sulle imprese manifatturiere dell'Emilia–Romagna, (Milan: FrancoAngeli).
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), pp. 155–173. doi: 10.2307/2295952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arundel, A. (2001) The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research Policy, 30(4), pp. 611–624. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00100-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. (2009) Next generation regional innovation policy: How to combine science and user driven approaches in regional innovation systems. Ekonomiaz, 70(01), pp. 106–131.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. & Coenen, L. (2005) Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), pp. 1173–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. & Isaksen, A. (2002) Regional innovation systems: The integration of local sticky and global ubiquitous knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), pp. 77–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1013100704794
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Coenen, L., Moodysson, J. & Vang, J. (2007) Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: Implications for regional innovation policy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 7(2), pp. 140–155. doi: 10.1504/IJEIM.2007.012879
   Google Scholar
• Augurzky, B. & Schmidt, C. M. (2001) The propensity score: A means to an end. IZA discussion paper no 271, Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, E., Kanninen, S. & Gustafsson, R. (2008) First-and second-order additionality and learning outcomes in collaborative R&D programs. Research Policy, 37(1), pp. 59–76. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, L. & Matt, M. (2002) Rationale for science and technology policy, in: L. Georgiou & J. Rigby (Eds) Assessing the Socio-economic Impacts of the Framework Programme, pp. 93–120 (Bruxelles: Report to European Commission DG Research).
   Google Scholar
• Bauernschuster, S., Falck, O. & Heblich, S. (2008) The impact of continuous training on firms’ innovations. CESifo Working paper no 2258, Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, S. & Ichino, A. (2002) Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal, 2(4), pp. 358–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belussi, F., Sammarra, A. & Sedita, S. (2010) “Open regional innovation system”: A focus on firms’ innovation strategies in the Emilia–Romagna life science industry. Research Policy, 39(6), pp. 710–721. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, P. & Giordani, M. (1993) Innovation policy at the local and national levels: The case of Emilia–Romagna. European Planning Studies, 1(1), pp. 25–41. doi: 10.1080/09654319308720193
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005) Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), pp. 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusco, S. (1982) The Emilian model: Productive decentralisation and social integration. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6(2), pp. 167–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, A., Dorsett, R. & Purdon, S. (2002) The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of labour market policies. Working paper no 4, Department for Work and Pensions, London.
   Google Scholar
• Buisseret, T., Cameron, H. & Georghiou, L. (1995) What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 4(5), pp. 587–600.
   Google Scholar
• Busom, I. & Fernandez-Ribas, A. (2008) The impact of firm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships. Research Policy, 37(2), pp. 240–257. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliendo, M. & Kopeinig, S. (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), pp. 31–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. & Trivedi, P. (2009) Microeconometrics Using Stata, (College Station, TX: Stata Press).5
   Google Scholar
• Cerulli, G. (2010) Modelling and measuring the effect of public subsidies on business R&D: A critical review of the econometric literature. Economic Record, 86(274), pp. 421–449. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2009.00615.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. (2010) Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance, in: B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 1, pp. 129–213. (London: Elsevier).
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M. & Etxebarria, G. (1997) Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4–5), pp. 475–491. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D. & Licht, G. (2006) Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy. Economics of Transition, 14(1), pp. 101–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0351.2006.00236.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, S., Grimes, C. & Davies, J. (1998) Research collaboration and behavioural additionality: A New Zealand case study. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(1), pp. 55–68. doi: 10.1080/09537329808524304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (2005) Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges, in: R. R. Nelson, D. C. Mowery & J. Fagerberg (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 181–208. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (2011) Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: Identification of systemic problems (or failures). Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), pp. 1637–1643. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtr060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erez, M. (2010) Culture and job design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), pp. 389–400. doi: 10.1002/job.651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evangelista, R., Iammarino, S., Mastrostefano, V. & Silvani, A. (2002) Looking for regional systems of innovation: Evidence from the Italian innovation survey. Regional Studies, 36(2), pp. 173–186. doi: 10.1080/00343400220121963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, R. (2007) Measuring the effects of public support schemes on firms’ innovation activities: Survey evidence from Austria. Research Policy, 36(5), pp. 665–679. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fier, A., Aschhoff, B. & Lohlein, H. (2006) Introduction and synthesis, in: OECD (Ed.) Behavioural Additionality of Public R&D Funding in Germany, pp. 9–38. (Paris: OECD publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. & Varga, A. (2002) Technological innovation and inter-firm cooperation: An exploratory analysis using survey data from manufacturing firms in the metropolitan region of Vienna. International Journal of Technology Management, 24(7), pp. 724–742. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2002.003080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R., Mellander, C. & Stolarick, K. (2008) Inside the black box of regional development: Human capital, the creative class and tolerance. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5), pp. 615–649. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbn023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, C., Marzucchi, A. & Montresor, S. (2011) The “potential” face of absorptive capacity. An empirical investigation for an area of 3 European countries. ORKESTRA Working paper 2011-R08WPS, San Sebastian.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. & Schwirten, C. (1999) Enterprise-university co-operation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, 6(1), pp. 69–83. doi: 10.1080/13662719900000005
   Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L. & Clarysse, B. (2006) Introduction and synthesis, in: OECD (Ed.) Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour, Measuring Behavioural Additionality, pp. 9–38. (Paris: OECD publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. & Maffioli, A. (2008) Evaluating the impact of technology development funds in emerging economies: Evidence from Latin America. The European Journal of Development Research, 20(2), pp. 172–198. doi: 10.1080/09578810802060819
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. (2002) Regional innovation support systems: Recent trends in Germany and East Asia. European Planning Studies, 10(2), pp. 153–164. doi: 10.1080/09654310120114463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. (2005) How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies, 13(4), pp. 521–535. doi: 10.1080/09654310500107134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollanders, H., Tarantola, S. & Loschky, A. (2009) Regional Innovation Scoreboard (RIS) 2009. Pro-Inno Europe, INNOMETRICS ISSN 1501-0066, Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar
• Howells, J. (1999) Regional systems of innovation?, in: J. Howells, D. Archibugi & J. Michie (Eds) Innovation Policy in a Global Economy, pp. 67–93. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, J. (1995) Industrial reorganization in developing countries: From models to trajectories. World Development, 23(1), pp. 149–162. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(94)00104-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, J. & Schmitz, H. (2002) How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?. Regional Studies, 36(9), pp. 1017–1027. doi: 10.1080/0034340022000022198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDEA (2006) Study and Evaluation of the Behavioural Additionality of R&D Subsidies. Final Report on behalf of IWT, IWT: Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. & Allen, T. (1982) Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D project groups. R&D Management, 12(1), pp. 7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lhuillery, S. & Pfister, E. (2009) R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data. Research Policy, 38(1), pp. 45–57. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magro, E., Aranguren, M. & Navarro, M. (2010) Does regional S&T policy affect firms’ behaviour? Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Annual International Conference 2010, May 24–26, University of Pécs, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. (2002) Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research policy, 31(2), pp. 247–264. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino, M. & Parrotta, P. (2010) Impacts of public funding to R&D: Evidences from Denmark. Paper presented at DRUID Summer Conference 2010, London.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. (2008) Human versus physical capital. Government's role in regional development, in: J. Martinez-Vazques & F. Vallaincourt (Eds) Public Policy for Regional Development, pp. 181–208. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Marzocchi, C. (2009) The Evolution of an Innovation Policy in a Local System of Production. The case of the Regional Programme for Industrial Research, Innovation and Technology Transfer. Eprints UNIFE, Ferrara.
   Google Scholar
• Marzucchi, A., Antonioli, D. & Montresor, S. (2012) Innovation cooperation within and across regional boundaries. Does innovation policy add something? Paper prepared for the DRUID2012 Conference, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur, V. (1999) Human capital-based strategy for regional economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 203–216. doi: 10.1177/089124249901300301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. (1995) Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), pp. 25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina-Morales, F. (2001) European industrial districts: Influence of geo-graphic concentration on performance of the firm. Journal of International Management, 7(4), pp. 277–294. doi: 10.1016/S1075-4253(01)00048-5
   Google Scholar
• Mora-Valentin, E., Montoro-Sanchez, A. & Guerras-Martin, L. (2004) Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations. Research Policy, 33(1), pp. 17–40. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00087-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (1997) The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31(5), pp. 491–503. doi: 10.1080/00343409750132289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. The Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), pp. 297–306. doi: 10.1086/258177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2006) Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality, (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Olander, H., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. & Mahonen, J. (2009) What's small size got to do with it? Protection of intellectual assets in SMEs. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(3), pp. 349–370. doi: 10.1142/S1363919609002339
   Google Scholar
• Perks, H., Kahn, K. & Zhang, C. (2009) An empirical evaluation of R&D– marketing NPD integration in Chinese firms: The Guanxi effect. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(6), pp. 640–651. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00689.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R. & Rubin, D. B. (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), pp. 41–55. doi: 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. & Thomas, N. (1996) Matching using estimated propensity scores: Relating theory to practice. Biometrics, 52(1), pp. 249–264. doi: 10.2307/2533160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, R. & Boekema, F. (2007) The Learning Region: Foundations, State of the Art, Future, (London: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. & Todd, E. (2005) Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators?. Journal of Econometrics, 125(1–2), pp. 305–353. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A. & Boschma, R. (2011) Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Regional Studies, 45(7), pp. 919–933. doi: 10.1080/00343400802662658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todtling, F. & Trippl, M. (2005) One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), pp. 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E. (2010) What is evolutionary about regional systems of innovation? Implications for regional policy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20(1), pp. 115–137. doi: 10.1007/s00191-009-0135-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wastyn, A. & Hussinger, K. (2011) Search for the not-invented-here syndrome: The role of knowledge sources and firm success. Paper prepared for the 2011 DRUID Conference, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar