The Dynamics and Evolution of Local Industries—The Case of Linköping, Sweden

References

• Agarwal, R., Sarkar, M.B. & Echambadi, R. (2002) The conditioning effect of time on firm survival: An industry life cycle approach, The Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), pp. 971–994. doi: 10.2307/3069325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H. (1999) Organizations Evolving (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H.E. & Fiol, M.E. (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation, Academy of Management Review, 19(4), pp. 645–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almroth, P. & Kolsgård, S. (1981) Näringsliv, in: S. Hellström (Eds) Linköpings Historia V, 1910–1970, pp. 29–105 (Örebro: Ljungföretagen).
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, M. & Koster, S. (2011) Sources of persistence in regional start-up rates—evidence from Sweden, Journal of Economic Geography, 11(1), pp. 179–201. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbp069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arenius, P. & Minniti, M. (2005) Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship, Journal of Small Business Economics, 24(3), pp. 233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K.J. (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, in: R. R. Nelson (Eds) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, pp. 609–626 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, W.B. (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events, The Economic Journal, 99(394), pp. 116–131. doi: 10.2307/2234208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W.B. (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, .Ann Arbor, MI: University of Ann Arbor, Michigan Press
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. & Feldman, M. (1996a) Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle, Review of Industrial Organization, 11(2), pp. 253–273. doi: 10.1007/BF00157670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. & Feldman, M. (1996b) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production, American Economic Review, 86(3), pp. 630–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D.B. & Keilbach, M. (2004) Entrepreneurship and regional growth: An evolutionary interpretation, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(5), pp. 605–616. doi: 10.1007/s00191-004-0228-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D., Heblich, S., Falck, O. & Feldman, M. (2008) The lifecycle of regions. Paper presented at the 25th Celebration Druid Conference 2008, June 17–20, 2008, Copenhagen, Denmark. Available at http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper.php?id=3127&cf=29 (accessed 25 April 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Autant-Bernard, C.P. (2001) Science and knowledge flows: Evidence from the French case, Research Policy, 30(7), pp. 1069–1078. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00131-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belussi, F. & Sedita, S.R. (2009) Life cycle vs. multiple path dependency in industrial districts, European Spatial Planning, 17(4), pp. 505–528. doi: 10.1080/09654310802682065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. (2008) Constructing regional advantage: Related variety and regional innovation policy. Report for the Dutch Scientific Council for Government Policy, Utrecht: University of Utrecht. Available at http://www.nerip.com/reports_briefing.aspx?id=528
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R.A. & Frenken, K. (2006) Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3), pp. 273–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R.A. & Frenken, K. (2009) Technological relatedness and regional branching, in: H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman, D. F. Kogel (Eds) Beyond Territory: Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation and Innovation, pp. 64–81 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R.A. & Iammarino, S. (2009) Related variety, trade linkages and regional growth in Italy, Economic Geography, 85(3), pp. 285–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R.A. & Lambooy, J.G. (1999) Evolutionary economics and economic geography, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9(4), pp. 411–429. doi: 10.1007/s001910050089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, T., Gambardella, A. & Saxenian, A. (2001) Old economy” inputs for “new economy” outcomes: Cluster formation in the new silicon valleys, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), pp. 835–860. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.835
   Google Scholar
• Buenstorf, G. & Klepper, S. (2009) Heritage and agglomeration: The Akron Tyre cluster revisited, Economic Journal, 119(537), pp. 705–733. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02216.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, A.D. (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C.M. (1997) The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Causes Great Firms to Fail (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press).
   Google Scholar
• Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., van de Velde, E. & Vohora, A. (2005) Spinning out new ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions, Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), pp. 183–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W.M. & Levinthal, D.A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, American Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp. 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin, J.G. & Slevin, D.P. (1990) New venture strategic posture, structure and performance: An industry life cycle analysis, Journal of Business Venturing, 5(2), pp. 123–135. doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(90)90004-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlstrand, A. (1997) Growth and inventiveness in technology-based spin-off firms, Research Policy, 26(3), pp. 331–344. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00016-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P.A. (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY, The American Economic Review, 75(2), pp. 332–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P.A. (2001) Path dependence, its critics and the quest for “historical economics”, in: P. Garrouste & S. Ioannides (Eds) Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present, pp. 15–40 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. & Nelson, R.R. (1994) An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4(3), pp. 153–172. doi: 10.1007/BF01236366
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G., Marsil, O., Orsenigo, L. & Salvatore, R. (1995) Learning, market selection and the evolution of industrial structures, Small Business Economics, 7(6), pp. 411–436. doi: 10.1007/BF01112463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson, G. (2010) Advanced Public Procurement as Industrial Policy: The Aircraft Industry as a Technical University (New York: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J. & Rigby, D.L. (2010) Generalized Darwinism and evolutionary economic geography, in: R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds) The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, pp. 43–61 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J. & Winther, L. (1999) Regional technological change and path dependency in the Danish food processing industry, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, 81(3), pp. 179–196. doi: 10.1111/j.0435-3684.1999.00903.x
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C. & Terra, B.R. C. (2000) The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, Research Policy, 29(2), pp. 313–330. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. (2003) The locational dynamics of the U.S. biotech industry: Knowledge externalities and the anchor hypothesis, Industry and Innovation, 10(3), pp. 311–329. doi: 10.1080/1366271032000141661
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1991) Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues, Research Policy, 20(5), pp. 499–514. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90072-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K. & Boschma, R.A. (2007) A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process, Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), pp. 635–649. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbm018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K. & Nuvolari, A. (2004) The early development of the steam engine: An evolutionary interpretation using complexity theory, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(2), pp. 419–450. doi: 10.1093/icc/dth017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (1993) The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr-area, in: G. Grabher (Eds) The Embedded Firm, pp. 253–277 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M.S. (1973) The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), pp. 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. (2005) How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster, European Planning Studies, 13(4), pp. 521–535. doi: 10.1080/09654310500107134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, S. (1983) Linköping—en omvandlad stad, in: Svenska Turistföreningen (Eds) Östergötland—Svenska Turistföreningens årsskrift 1983, pp. 253–266 (Uppsala: Esselte Herzogs).
   Google Scholar
• Henrekson, M. & Stenkula, M. (2007) Entreprenörskap (Stockholm: SNS Förlag).
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, D., Cohen, W.M., Hounshell, D.A. & Klepper, S. (2000) The nature, sources, and consequences of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry, Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), pp. 1017–1041. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1017::AID-SMJ131>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommen, L., Doloreux, D. & Larsson, E. (2006) Emergence and growth of Mjärdvi science park in Linköping, Sweden, European Planning Studies, 14(10), pp. 1331–1361. doi: 10.1080/09654310600852555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. & Allen, T.J. (1982) Investigating the not-invented-here (NIH) syndrome: A look at performance, tenure and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups, R&D Management, 12(1), pp. 7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. (1996) Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over product life cycle, The American Economic Review, 86(3), pp. 562–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. (2007) Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry, Management Science, 53(4), pp. 616–631. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. (2010) The origin and growth of industry clusters: The making of Silicon Valley and Detroit, Journal of Urban Economics, 67(1), pp. 15–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. & Thompson, P. (2006) Intra-industry spinoffs. Working paper, Department of Economics, Florida International University, Miami, FL. Available at http://www.hbs.edu/units/strategy/pdf/5_Klepper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Klofsten, M., Jones-Evans, D. & Schärberg, C. (1999) Growing the Linköping technopole—a longitudinal study of triple helix development in Sweden, Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(2–3), pp. 125–138. doi: 10.1023/A:1007843019679
   Google Scholar
• Knuthammar, C. (1994) En omväxlande historia: Linköpings tekniska högskola 1969–1994 (Linköping: Linköping University).
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1996) The Self-Organizing Economy (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Kuznets, S. (1930) Secular Movements in Production and Prices (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin).
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A. (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data, Academy of Management Review, 24(4), pp. 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent, J. & Nightingale, J. (2001) Darwinism and Evolutionary Economics, In J. Laurent & J. Nightingale (Eds) Cheltenham: Edward Eldgar Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, T. (1965) Exploit the product life cycle, Harvard Business Review, 43(November–December), pp. 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lokalhistoria (1999) Linköpings historia—1900 talet (Linköping: Centrum for Lokalhistoria).
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. & Orsenigo, L. (1996) The dynamics and evolution of industries, Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(1), pp. 51–87. doi: 10.1093/icc/5.1.51
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. & Simmie, J. (2008) Path dependence and local innovation systems in city-regions, Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2–3), pp. 183–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. & Sunley, P. (2006) Path dependence and regional economic evolution, Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), pp. 395–437. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. & Sunley, P. (2007) Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), pp. 573–601. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbm019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. & Sunley, P. (2011) Conceptualizing cluster evolution: Beyond the life cycle model?, Regional Studies, 45(10), pp. 1299–1318. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.622263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, M.P. & Fornahl, D. (2010) Cluster life cycles—dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution, Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(1), pp. 205–238. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtp036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Stam, J. (1998) Path Dependence in regional development: Persistence and change in three industrial clusters in Santa Catarina, Brazil, World Development, 26(8), pp. 1495–1511. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00072-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murmann, J.P. & Frenken, K. (2006) Towards a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change, Research Policy, 35(7), pp. 925–952. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M. & Boschma, R. (2009) How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, No. 09.16, Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., Boschma, R. & Olander, L.O. (2011) The dynamics of agglomeration externalities along life-cycle of industries, Regional Studies, 45(1), pp. 49–65. doi: 10.1080/00343401003596307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R.R. (1995) Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change, Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), pp. 48–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and the Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Orlando, M.P. (2000) On the Importance of Geographic and Technological Proximity for R&D Spillover: An Empirical Investigation, .Kansas City, MO: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City)
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, E. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (New York: John Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Peréz, M.P. & Sanchéz, A.M. (2003) The development of university spin-offs: Early dynamics of technology transfer and networking, Technovation, 23(10), pp. 823–831. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00034-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C.K. & Hamel, G. (1990) The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review, 68(3), pp. 79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. (1996) Regional Advantage—Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schienstock, G. (2007) From path dependency to path creation: Finland on its way to the knowledge-based economy, Current Sociology, 55(1), pp. 92–109. doi: 10.1177/0011392107070136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J.A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J.A. (1939) Business Cycles (New York: McGraw Hill).
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S. (2003) A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus (Cheltenham: Edward Eldgar Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Shapero, A. & Sokol, L. (1982) The social dimensions of entrepreneurship, in: C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, K. H. Vesper (Eds) Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, pp. 72–90 (Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
   Google Scholar
• Shapira, P. & Youtie, J. (2008) Emergence of nanodistricts in the United States: Path dependency or new opportunities, Economic Development Quarterly, 22(3), pp. 187–199. doi: 10.1177/0891242408320968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utterback, J.M. (1994) Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press).
   Google Scholar
• Van Klink, A. & De Langen, P. (2001) Cycles in industrial clusters: The case of the shipbuilding industry in the Northern Netherlands, Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 92(4), pp. 449–463. doi: 10.1111/1467-9663.00171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon, R. (1966) International investment and international trade in the product cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), pp. 190–207. doi: 10.2307/1880689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. & Young, L. (2002) On cooperating: Firms, relations and networks, Journal of Business Research, 55(2), pp. 123–132. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00147-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, P. (2004) Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(5), pp. 391–412. doi: 10.1080/0898562042000188423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zietsma, C. & Lawrence, T.B. (2010) Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work, Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), pp. 189–221. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar