298
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The European Union as an Ethical Community and What This Means for Spatial Planning

&
Pages 1010-1026 | Received 01 Dec 2011, Accepted 01 Dec 2012, Published online: 29 Jan 2013

References

  • Adams, N. (2008) Convergence and policy transfer: An examination of the extent to which approaches to spatial planning have converged within the context of an enlarged E.U, International Planning Studies, 13(1), pp. 21–49.
  • Bachtler, J. & Polverari, L. (2007) Delivering territorial cohesion, in: A. Faludi (Eds) Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society, pp. 105–128 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute).
  • Biedenkopf, K., Gemerek, B. & Michalski, K. (2004) The Spiritual and Cultural Dimension of Europe. Reflection group initiated by the President of the European Union, Institute for Human Sciences/European Commission, Vienna.
  • Boedeltje, F. & van Houtum, H. (2008) The abduction of Europe: A plea for less “unionism” and more Europe, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99(3), pp. 361–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00467.x
  • Böhme, K. & Eser, T.W. (2008) Territorial impact analysis of EU policies, in: A. Faludi (Ed.) European Spatial Research and Planning, pp. 43–66 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute).
  • Böhme, K., Richardson, T., Dabinett, G. & Jensen, O.B. (2004) Values in a vacuum? Towards an integrated multi-level analysis of the governance of European space, European Planning Studies, 12(8), pp. 1175–1188.
  • Bond, E.J. (2001) Concept of value, in: L. C. Becker & C. B. Becker (Eds) Encyclopedia of Ethics, pp. 1745–1750, 2nd ed (London: Routledge).
  • Borchardt, K.-D. (2010) The ABC of European Union Law (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union).
  • CEC (1993) European Council in Copenhagen 21–22 June 1993. Conclusions of the presidency. Doc. SN 180/1/93.
  • CEC (1994) European Social Policy, A Way Forward for the Union, a white paper. Com 332 final, 27/7/1994. Brussels.
  • CEC (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective, Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union (Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities).
  • CEC (2000) Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Communities, 18 December 2000.
  • CEC (2001) Services of General Interest in Europe. Communication from the Commission, 2001 (C 17–04) Official Journal of the European Communities, 19 January 2001.
  • CEC (2004) A New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation. Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion (Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities).
  • CEC (2005) European Values in a Globalized World, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Com (2005) 525 final, 20 October 2005, Brussels.
  • CEC (2006a) Impact Assessment Guidelines, SEC 2005, Brussels.
  • CEC (2006b) Common Guidelines, Consultation deadline for Bulgaria and Romania: 23.08.2006. Council decision on Community Strategic Guidelines on Cohesion. 11807/06; 18 August 2006, Brussels.
  • CEC (2006c) Declaration on Sustainable Development. 10117/06.
  • CEC (2007a) Fourth report on economic and social cohesion, SEC (2007) 694 Com 2007 273 final, 30 May 2007, Brussels.
  • CEC (2007b) Territorial Agenda of the European Union, towards a More Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions, agreed on the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion in Leipzig on 24 May 2007.
  • CEC (2009) Promoting Sustainable Urban Development in Europe. Achievements and Opportunities. D.G. for Regional Policy. April 2009, Brussels.
  • CEC (2010a). Investing in Europe’s Future. Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. D.G. for Regional Policy, November 2010. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • CEC (2010b) Europe 2020. A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Com(2010) 2020 final, 3 March 2010, Brussels.
  • CEC (2010c) Platform against Poverty and Social Exclusion: A European Framework for Social and Territorial Cohesion. COM(2010) 758 final, SEC (2010) 1564 final, 16 December 2010, Brussels.
  • CEC (2010d) Toledo Declaration. Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development on 22 June 2010 Toledo, Spain.
  • CEC (2011) Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020. Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19 May 2011 Gödöllő, Hungary.
  • Davoudi, S. (2007) Territorial cohesion, the European social model and spatial policy, in: A. Faludi (Ed.) Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society, pp. 81–100 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute).
  • Doucet, P. (2006) Territorial cohesion of tomorrow: A path to cooperation of competition, European Planning Studies, 14(10), pp. 1474–1485. doi: 10.1080/09654310600852449
  • Dühr, S. (2011) Territorial cohesion and its impact on sustainable development, in EcoRegion Perspectives, 2011/2, pp. 14–15. Available at http://www.baltic-ecoregion.eu/index.php/Home;1/1 (accessed 1 December 2012).
  • Dühr, S., Colomb, C. & Nadin, V. (2010) European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation (London: Routledge).
  • EUR-Lex (1997) Treaty of Amsterdam, Official journal of the European Union. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu (accessed 22 December 2012).
  • EUR-Lex (2008) Treaty on Euroopean Union, Official journal of the European Union. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu (accessed 22 December 2012).
  • Evers, D., Tennekes, J., Borsboom, J., van den Heiligenberg, H. & Thissen, M. (2009) A Territorial Impact Assessment of Territorial Cohesion for the Netherlands (The Hague: The Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency).
  • Faludi, A. (2007a) Introduction, in: A. Faludi (Ed.) European Spatial Research and Planning, pp. 1–20 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute).
  • Fauldi, A. (2007b) Territorial cohesion policy and the European model of society, European Planning Studies, 15(4), pp. 567–583. doi: 10.1080/09654310701232079
  • Faludi, A. (2009) Territorial Cohesion Under the Looking Glass. Synthesis paper about the history of the concept and policy background to territorial cohesion, European Commission—Regional Policy—Inforegio. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/consultation/terco/pdf/lookingglass.pdf (accessed 5 December 2012).
  • Groth, N.B., Smidt-Jesne, S. & Nielsen, T.A. S. (2011) Polycentricity: An issue in local development strategies? Findings from the Baltic Sea region, European Planning Studies, 19(5), pp. 727–751. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.561034
  • Hague, C. & Hachmann, V. (2008) Organization, achievements and the future of ESPON, in: A. Faludi (Ed.) European Spatial Research and Planning, pp. 21–42 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute).
  • Halman, L. (1991) Waarden in de Westerse Wereld (Tilburg: Tilburg University Press).
  • Hoekveld, G. & Needham, B. (2013) Planning practice between ethics and the power game: Making and applying an ethical code for planning agencies, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2012.01146.x
  • Hübner, D. (2009) Reflection Paper on Future Cohesion Policy. Informal meeting of Ministers for Regional Policy at Marianske Lazne, CEC, DG for Regional Policy, Brussels, 22–24 April 2009.
  • Jensen, O.B. & Richardson, T. (2001) Nested visions; new rationalities of space in European spatial planning, Regional Studies, 35(8), pp. 703–717. doi: 10.1080/00343400120084696
  • Moussis, N. (2011) Access to European Union: Law, Economics, Policies 19, Rixensart: European Study Service).
  • Musyck, B. & Reid, A. (2007) Innovation and regional development, do European structural funds make a difference?, European Planning Studies, 15(7), pp. 962–983. doi: 10.1080/09654310701356696
  • Nadin, V. & Stead, D. (2008) European spatial planning systems, social models and learning, disP, 172(1), pp. 25–47.
  • Needham, B. (2007) Dutch Land-Use Planning (London: Routledge).
  • Peyrony, J. (2007) Territorial cohesion and the European model of society: French perspectives, in: A. Faludi (Ed.) Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society, pp. 61–80 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute).
  • Ploeger, H.D. & Groetelaers, D.A. (2007) The importance of the fundamental right to property for the practice of planning: An introduction to the case law of the European court of human rights on article 1 protocol 1, European Planning Studies, 15(10), pp. 1424–1438. doi: 10.1080/09654310701550876
  • van Ravesteyn, N. & Evers, D. (2004) Unseen Europe; A Survey of EU Politics and its Impact on Spatial Development in the Netherlands (Rotterdam: Ruimtelijk Planbureau, NAi Uitgevers).
  • Samecki, P. (2009) Orientation Paper on Future Cohesion Policy (Brussels: CEC, DG for Regional Policy).
  • Sapir, A. (2005) Globalization and the Reform of European Social Models. Bruegel Policy Brief, November 2005. Brussels.
  • Schout, J.A. & Jordan, A.J. (2007) From cohesion to territorial policy integration (TPI): Exploring the governance challenges in the European Union, European Planning Studies, 15(6), pp. 836–851.
  • Selznick, Ph. (1994) The Moral Commonwealth, Social Theory and the Promise of Community (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
  • Smith, M. (2010) Centralised Enforcement, Legitimacy and Good Governance in the EU (London: Routledge).
  • Sutherland, P. D. (2010) Europe: Values and Identity, Annual Cardinal Newman Lecture, St John's College, Oxford University, 19 May 2010.
  • Sykes, O. (2008) The importance of context and comparison in the study of European spatial planning, European Planning Studies, 16(4), pp. 538–558.
  • Tatzeberger, G. (2007) The Vienna-Bratislav-Györ triangle, the European model of society in action, in: A. Faludi (Ed.) Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society, pp. 165–190 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute).
  • Vanolo, A. (2010) European spatial planning between competitiveness and territorial cohesion shadows of neo-liberalism, European Planning Studies, 18(8), pp. 1302–1315. doi: 10.1080/09654311003791358
  • Vinken, H. (1997) Political Values and Youth Centrism: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives on the Pol-Value Distinctiveness of Dutch Youth Centrists (Tilburg: Tilburg University Press).
  • Waterhout, B. (2007) Territorial cohesion, the underlying discourses, in: A. Faludi (Ed.) Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society, pp. 37–60 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute).
  • Williams, A.J. (2010) The Ethos of Europe: Values, Law and Justice in the EU (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Zonneveld, W. (2007) Unravelling Europe's spatial structure through spatial visioning, in: A. Faludi (Ed.) Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society, pp. 191–208 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute).
  • Zonneveld, W. & Waterhout, B. (2009) EU Territorial Impact Assessment: Under What Conditions? Final Report Delft, TU Delft, OTB Research Institute.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.