Spatial Planning in the Baltic States: Impacts of European Policies

References

• Adams, N. (2008). Convergence and policy transfer: An examination of the extent to which approaches to spatial planning have converged within the context of an enlarged EU. International Planning Studies, 13(1), pp. 31–49. doi: 10.1080/13563470801969608
   Google Scholar
• Adams, N., Cotella, G. & Nunes, R. (2013) The engagement of territorial knowledge communities with European spatial planning and the territorial cohesion debate: A Baltic perspective, European Planning Studies. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772735.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Mendez, C., Oraže, H. (2013). From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Regional policy performance and administrative capacity. European Planning Studies, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772744
   Google Scholar
• Balchin, P., Sykora, L., Bull, G. (1999). Regional Policy & Planning in Europe, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Batt, J. R., Wolczuk, K. (1999). The political context: Building new states. In HareP.BattJ.EstrinS. (Ed.), Reconstituting the Market: The Political Economy of Microeconomic Transformation, pp. 33–48). (Amsterdam: Harwood Academic).
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J. (1991). Review article: What is policy convergence and what causes it?. British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), pp. 215–233. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400006116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhme, K. (2002). Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning, (Stockholm: Nordregio).
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K., Richardson, T., Dabinett, G., Jensen, O. B. (2004). Values in a vacuum? Towards an integrated multilevel analysis of the governance of European space. European Planning Studies, 12(8), pp. 1175–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhme, K. & Waterhout, B. (2008) The Europeanization of planning, in: A. Faludi (Ed.) European Spatial Research and Planning, pp. 225–248 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Insitute of Land Policy).
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A. (2002). States and Regions in the European Union: Institutional Adaptation in Germany and Spain, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Colomb, C. (2007). The added value of transnational cooperation: Towards a new framework for evaluating learning and policy change. Planning Practice and Research, 22(3), pp. 347–372. doi: 10.1080/02697450701666712
   Google Scholar
• Dabinett, G. (2006). Transnational spatial planning—Insights from practices in the European Union. Urban Policy and Research, 24(2), pp. 283–290. doi: 10.1080/08111140600704723
   Google Scholar
• Dabinett, G., Richardson, T. (2005). The Europeanisation of spatial strategy: Shaping regions and spatial justice through governmental ideas. International Planning Studies, 10(3/4), pp. 201–218. doi: 10.1080/13563470500378549
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. (2002). Export of planning knowledge needs comparative analysis: The case of applying western land consolidation experience in Central Europe. European Planning Studies, 10(7), pp. 911–922. doi: 10.1080/0965431022000013293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downes, R. (1996). Regional policy development in Central and Eastern Europe. In AldenJ.BolandP. (Ed.), Regional Development Strategies: A European Perspective, pp. 256–272). (London: Jessica Kingsley and Regional Studies Association).
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Stead, D., Zonneveld, W. (2007). The Europeanization of spatial planning through territorial cooperation. Planning Practice and Research, 22(3), pp. 291–307. doi: 10.1080/02697450701688245
   Google Scholar
• Fürst, D. (2009). Planning cultures en route to a better comprehension of ‘planning processes’?. In KnielingJ.OthengrafenF. (Ed.), Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, pp. 23–38). (Farnham: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Giannakourou, G. (2005). Transforming spatial planning policy in Mediterranean countries: Europeanization and domestic change. European Planning Studies, 13(2), pp. 319–331. doi: 10.1080/0365431042000321857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, K. H. (2006) Territory, Temporality and Clustered Europeanization, IHS Political Science Series, 109 (Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Grabbe, H. (2001). How does Europeanisation affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), pp. 1013–1031. doi: 10.1080/13501760110098323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamedinger, A., Bartik, H., Wolffhardt, A. (2008). The impact of EU area-based programmes on local governance: Towards a ‘Europeanisation’?. Urban Studies, 45(13), pp. 2669–2687. doi: 10.1177/0042098008098199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P., Williams, R. H. (1993). European planning systems: Diversity and convergence. Urban Studies, 30(3/4), pp. 701–720. doi: 10.1080/00420989320081881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., Kerwer, D., Knill, C., Lehmkuhl, D. (2001). Differential Europe: The European Union Impact on National Policy-Making, (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield).
   Google Scholar
• Jaakson, R. (2000). Supra-national spatial planning of the Baltic Sea Region and competing narratives for tourism. European Planning Studies, 8(5), pp. 565–579. doi: 10.1080/713666424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. (2003). Shaping European spatial planning: How Italy's experience can contribute. Town Planning Review, 74(1), pp. 51–76. doi: 10.3828/tpr.74.1.4
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U., Faludi, A. (2005). The hidden face of European spatial planning: Innovations in governance. European Planning Studies, 13(2), pp. 195–215. doi: 10.1080/0965431042000321785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauhiainen, J. (2013). New spatial patterns and territorial-administrative structures in the European Union: Reflections on Eastern Europe. European Planning Studies, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772732
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B., Richardson, T. (2004). Making European Space. Mobility, Power and Territorial Identity, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, M. & Edelenbos, J. (2007) An insider's look into policy transfer in transnational expert networks, European Planning Studies, 15(5), pp. 687–706.
   Google Scholar
• Kule, L. (2013). Urban-rural interactions in Latvian changing policy and practice context. European Planning Studies, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772785
   Google Scholar
• Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., Fuller, S. & Böhme, K. (Eds) (2005) Integrated multi-level analysis of the governance of European space (IMAGES), Nordregio working paper, 2, Nordregio, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Leetmaa, K., Brade, I., Anniste, K., Nuga, M. (2012). Socialist summer home settlements in post-socialist suburbanisation. Urban Studies, 49(1), pp. 3–21. doi: 10.1177/0042098010397399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, K. (1998) Czech planning in transition: Assets and deficiencies, International Planning Studies, 3(3), pp. 351–365.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (2005). Europeanization at the urban level: Local actors, institutions and the dynamics of multi-level interaction. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(4), pp. 668–686. doi: 10.1080/13501760500160292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, D. (1995). Attitudes towards the market and political participation in the post-communist states. Slavic Review, 54(2), pp. 385–406. doi: 10.2307/2501627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedović-Budić, Z. (2001). Adjustment of planning practice to the New Eastern and Central European context. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1), pp. 38–52. doi: 10.1080/01944360108976354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedović-Budić, Z., Tsenkova, S., Marcuse, P. (2006). The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe. In TsenkovaS.Nedović-BudićZ. (Ed.), The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe, pp. 3–20). (New York: Physica-Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer, C. (2006). Reforming regional governance in East Central Europe: Europeanization or domestic politics as usual?. East European Politics and Societies, 20(2), pp. 219–253. doi: 10.1177/0888325404271286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallagst, K. (2006). European spatial planning reloaded: Considering EU enlargement in theory and practice. European Planning Studies, 14(2), pp. 253–272. doi: 10.1080/09654310500418259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedrazzini, L. (2005). Applying the ESDP through INTERREG IIIB: A Southern perspective. European Planning Studies, 13(2), pp. 297–317. doi: 10.1080/0965431042000321848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., Buehler, R. (2005). Transport policy in post-communist Europe. In HensherD. A.ButtonD. J. (Ed.), Handbooks in Transportation, pp. 725–743). (London: Elsevier).
   Google Scholar
• Raagmaa, G. (2009). Planning theories and development practices: Past dependencies contra new ideology: Impact of planning for sustainable housing development. In Holt-JensenA.PollockE. (Ed.), Urban Sustainability and Governance: New Challenges in Nordic-Baltic Housing Policies, pp. 79–99). (New York: Nova Science).
   Google Scholar
• Raagmaa, G., Kalvet, T., Kasesalu, R. (2013). Europeanisation and de-Europeanisation of Estonian regional policy. European Planning Studies, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772754
   Google Scholar
• Raagmaa, G., Kroon, K. (2005). The future of collective farms’ built social infrastructure: Choosing between central place and network theories. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 87(3), pp. 205–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanilov, K. (2007). Political reform, economic development, and regional growth in post-socialist Europe. In StanilovK. (Ed.), The Post-Socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism, pp. 35–52). (Dordrecht: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2013). European integration and spatial rescaling in the Baltic region: Soft spaces, soft planning and soft security. European Planning Studies, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772731
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2013). Convergence, divergence, or constancy of spatial planning? Connecting theoretical concepts with empirical evidence from Europe. Journal of Planning Literature, 28(1), doi: 10.1177/0885412212471562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes, O. (2008). The importance of context and comparison in the study of European spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 16(4), pp. 537–555. doi: 10.1080/09654310801983464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafel-Viia, K., Viia, A., Terk, E., Lassur, S. (2013). Policy patterns in creative industries: Comparison of European cities. European Planning Studies, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772755
   Google Scholar
• Tammiksaar, E., Pae, T. & Kurs, O. (2013) A continuity of ideas? Salme Ňmmik, Edgar Kant and the development of economic geography in Soviet Estonia, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 95(1), pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M., Williams, R. H. (2001). The European Dimension of British Planning, (London: Spon).
   Google Scholar
• UNECE (2000) ECE Strategy for Sustainable Quality of Life in Human Settlements in the 21st Century, Report HBP/1999/4/Rev.1, Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ravesteyn, N., Evers, D. (2004). Unseen Europe: A Survey of EU Politics and Its Impacts on Spatial Development in the Netherlands, (The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Spatial Planning).
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B. (2007). Episodes of Europeanization of Dutch national spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 22(3), pp. 309–327. doi: 10.1080/02697450701666696
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B., Stead, D. (2007). Mixed messages: How the ESDP's messages have been applied in INTERREG IIIB programmes, priorities and projects. Planning, Practice & Research, 22(3), pp. 395–415. doi: 10.1080/02697450701775216
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, W. (2005). The Europeanization of Dutch national spatial planning: An uphill battle. disP—The Planning Review, 44(163), pp. 4–15. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2005.10556936
   Google Scholar