European Integration and Spatial Rescaling in the Baltic Region: Soft Spaces, Soft Planning and Soft Security

References

• Allmendinger, P. & Haughton, G. (2009) Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A, 41(3), pp. 617–633. doi: 10.1068/a40208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austrian Conference on Spatial Planning/Österreichische Raumordnungskonferenz (ÖROK) (2012) Makroregionale Strategien der EU [EU macro-regional strategies]. Available at www.oerok.gv.at/?id=846 (accessed 20 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Bartolini, S. (2005) Restructuring Europe, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Benz, A. (2002) How to reduce the Burden for spatial coordination. in: A. Faludi (Ed) European Spatial Planning, Lessons for North America, pp. 119–135. (Boston, MA: The Lincoln Institute for Land Policy).
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004) News State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood, (Oxford: University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Brindley, T., Rydin, Y. & Stoker, G. (1989) Remaking Planning: The Politics of Urban Change in the Thatcher Years, (London: Unwin Hyman).
   Google Scholar
• Cappellin, R. (1998) Transborder co-operation along the EU's external borders and the turnabout of regional development policies: A Mediterranean perspective. in: L. Hedegaard, B. Lindström, P. Joenniemi, A. Östhol, K. Peschel & C. E. Stalvant (Eds) The NEBI Yearbook 1998. North European and Baltic Sea Integration, pp. 323–335. (Berlin: Springer Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T. (1997) A European meso-region? European perspectives on the Baltic Sea Region. in: P. Joenniemi (Ed) Neo-nationalism or Regionality. The Restructuring of Political Space Around the Baltic Rim, pp. 254–292. (Stockholm: NordREFO).
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., Petito, F. & Tonra, B. (2000) Fuzzy politics around fuzzy borders: The European Union's “Near abroad”. Cooperation and Conflict, 35(4), pp. 389–415. doi: 10.1177/00108360021962183
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. & Jones, A. (2008) The spatialities of Europeanisation: Territory, government and power on “Europe”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(3), pp. 300–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. (2012) Rescaling environmental governance: Watersheds as boundary objects at the intersection of science, neoliberalism, and participation. Environment and Planning A, 44(9), pp. 2207–2224. doi: 10.1068/a44265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colomb, C. (2007) The added value of transnational cooperation: Towards a new framework for evaluating learning and policy change. Planning Practice and Research, 22(3), pp. 347–372. doi: 10.1080/02697450701666712
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2001) European Governance. A White Paper. COM(2001)428 Final, (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (2008) Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion. Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength. COM(2008)616 Final, (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Spatial Development (CSD) (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU, (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Community).
   Google Scholar
• Deas, I. & Lord, A. (2006) From a new regionalism to an unusual regionalism? The emergence of non-standard regional spaces and lessons for the territorial reorganisation of the state. Urban Studies, 43(10), pp. 1847–1877. doi: 10.1080/00420980600838143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., Hedin, S., Schmitt, P. & Sterling, J. (2009) EU macro-regions and macro-regional strategies—a scoping study. Nordregio Working Paper 2009/4, Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S. (2006) The Visual Language of Spatial Planning. Exploring Cartographic Representations for Spatial Planning in Europe, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Stead, D. & Zonneveld, W. (2007) The Europeanization of spatial planning through territorial cooperation. Introduction to the Special Issue. Planning Practice and Research, 22(3), pp. 291–307. doi: 10.1080/02697450701688245
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2008) Transnational Territorial Cooperation: Belgium—Germany—Ireland—France—Luxembourg—the Netherlands—United Kingdom—Switzerland. European Commission MEMO/08/76, 7 February, DG-REGIO, Brussels: European Commission. Available at www.europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/08/76 (accessed 20 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2009a) Macro-regional strategies in the EU. A Discussion Paper presented by Commissioner Pawel Samecki, 16 September. DG Regional Policy European Commission, Brussels. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/cooperation/baltic/press_en.htm (accessed 20 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2009b) Commissioner Samecki Addresses Major Conference on Cohesion Policy and Territorial Development in Kiruna, Sweden (10–11 December). European Commission Press Release IP/09/1894, 16 September, DG-REGIO, Brussels: European Commission. Available at www.europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/1894 (accessed 20 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011a) INTERREG IIIB: Transnational Cooperation. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/interreg3/abc/voletb_en.htm (accessed 20 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011b) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR). COM(2011) 381 Final. Brussels: European Commission. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/cooperate/baltic/documents_en.cfm (accessed 20 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2012) Cohesion Policy 2007–2013: Transnational programmes under the European Territorial Cooperation Objective. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/atlas2007/transnational/index_en.htm (accessed 20 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (undated) Country Strategy Paper 2007–2013. Russian Federation, (Brussels: DG-RELEX, European Commission). . Available at www.ec.europa.eu/external_relations/russia/docs (accessed 20 November 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2001) The performance of spatial planning. in: A. Koresawa & J. Konvitz (Eds) Towards a New Role for Spatial Planning, pp. 105–132 (Paris: OECD)
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2008a) European territorial cooperation and learning. Reflections by the guest editor on the wider implications. disP—The Planning Review, 172(1), pp. 3–8. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2008.10556998
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2008b) The learning machine: European integration in the planning mirror. Environment and Planning A, 40(6), pp. 1470–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2012) Multi-level (territorial) governance: Three criticisms. Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2), pp. 197–211. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.677578
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. & Waterhout, B. (2002) The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Filtenborg, M. S., Gänzle, S. & Johansson, E. (2002) An alternative theoretical approach to EU foreign policy: “Network governance” and the case of the northern dimension initiative. Cooperation and Conflict, 37(4), pp. 387–407. doi: 10.1177/001083602762574478
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1993) Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4), pp. 482–485. doi: 10.1080/01944369308975902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friis, J. (2012) Danish Presidency of the Council: The European priorities, Newsletter INTERACT, winter 2011/2012, pp. 12–13. Available at www.interact-eu.net/interact_newsletter/250
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. (2011) Interfaces of European Union internal and external territorial governance: The Baltic Sea Region. in: N. Adams, G. Cotella & R. Nunes (Eds) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning. Building on EU Enlargement, pp. 382–401. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Gänzle, S. (2011) Introduction: Transnational governance and policy-making in the Baltic Sea Region. Journal of Baltic Studies, 42(1), pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1080/01629778.2011.538509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G. & Allmendinger, P. (2007) Soft spaces in planning. Town and Country Planning, 76(9), pp. 306–308.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D. & Vigar, G. (2009) The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006) Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 14(4), pp. 525–546. doi: 10.1080/09654310500421196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herod, A. & Wright, M. (Eds) (2002) Geographies of Power: Placing Scale, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (1996) “Europe with the regions”: Channels of regional representation in the European Union. Publius—The Journal of Federalism, 26(1), pp. 73–92. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a029841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2003) Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), pp. 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2005) Multi-level governance and multi-level meta-governance. in: F. Kratochwil & E. Mansfield (Eds) International Organisation and Global Governance: A Reader, pp. 355–367. (London: Pearson Longman).
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (2009) Rescaling Europe. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 10(1), pp. 34–50. doi: 10.1080/15705850802699995
   Google Scholar
• Keil, R. & Mahon, R. (Eds) (2008) Leviathan Undone? The Political Economy of Scale, (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. (2007) Territorial governance in transition. Regional & Federal Studies, 17(4), pp. 499–508. doi: 10.1080/13597560701691896
   Google Scholar
• Luxembourg Ministry of the Interior and Spatial Planning (2005) Scoping Document and Summary of Political Messages for an Assessment of the Territorial State and Perspectives of the European Union: Towards a Stronger European Territorial Cohesion in the Light of the Lisbon and Gothenburg Ambitions, (Luxembourg: Ministry of the Interior and Spatial Planning). Available at www.eu-territorial-agenda.eu/PresidencyConclusions/Min%20DOC%201_finlux505.pdf (accessed 20 November 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J. & Moilanen, H. (2012) Territoriality in the strategies and practices of the territorial cohesion policy of the European Union: Territorial challenges in implementing “soft planning”. European Planning Studies, 20(3), pp. 481–500.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2003) Framing space and time in the city: Urban policy and the politics of spatial and temporal scale. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(2), pp. 159–178. doi: 10.1111/1467-9906.t01-1-00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2002) Politics and scale: Some implications for environmental governance. Landscape and Urban Planning, 61(2/4), pp. 169–179. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00111-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. & Schmitt, P. (2012) When soft spaces harden: The EU strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Environment and Planning A, 44(2), pp. 263–280. doi: 10.1068/a44188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, T. & Newig, J. (2010) Multilevel water governance and problems of scale: Setting the stage for a broader debate. Environmental Management, 46(1), pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9531-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. B. (2008) Rethinking multi-level governance in a changing European Union: Why metageography and territoriality matter. GeoJournal, 72(1/2), pp. 7–18. doi: 10.1007/s10708-008-9161-9
   Google Scholar
• Piskorz, W. (2009) What is the policy context, why is territorial cooperation important for territorial cohesion? The view from the European Commission. Introductory statement at the Territorial Cooperation and Territorial Cohesion Seminar, Brussels, 25 September. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/conferences/territorial/25092009/programme_en.cfm (accessed 20 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Razumeyko, N. (2011) Strategic planning practices in North-west Russia: European influences, challenges and future perspectives. in: N. Adams, G. Cotella & R. Nunes (Eds) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning. Building on EU Enlargement, pp. 402–421. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. & McMaster, R. B. (2004) in: E. Sheppard & R. B. McMaster (Eds) Scale and Geographic Inquiry. Nature, Society, and Method, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. A. & Timmins, G. (2000) The EU, NATO, and the extension of institutional order in Europe. World Affairs, 163(2), pp. 80–89.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2011) Policy & planning brief. European macro-regional strategies: Indications of spatial rescaling?. Planning Theory and Practice, 12(1), pp. 163–167. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2011.545664
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. & Waterhout, B. (2008) Learning from the application of the ESDP: Influences on European territorial governance. disP—The Planning Review, 172(1), pp. 21–34. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2008.10557000
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B. (2010) Soft spaces and governance: The transformation of planning. Paper presented at the 24th AESOP Annual Conference, Helsinki, 7–10 July.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B. & Stead, D. (2007) Mixed messages: How the ESDP's concepts have been applied in INTERREG IIIB programmes, priorities and projects. Planning Practice and Research, 22(3), pp. 395–415. doi: 10.1080/02697450701775216
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, W. (2005) Expansive spatial planning: The new European transnational spatial visions. European Planning Studies, 13(1), pp. 137–155. doi: 10.1080/0965431042000312442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar