The Engagement of Territorial Knowledge Communities with European Spatial Planning and the Territorial Cohesion Debate: A Baltic Perspective

References

• Adams, N. (2006) National spatial strategies in the Baltic States. in: N. Adams, J. Alden & N. Harris (Eds) Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged EU, pp. 155–181. (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Adams, N. (2008) Convergence and policy transfer: An examination of the extent to which approaches to spatial planning have converged within the context of an enlarged EU. International Planning Studies, 13(1), pp. 31–50. doi: 10.1080/13563470801969608
   Google Scholar
• Adams, N. & Harris, N. (2005) Best Practice Guidelines for Regional Development Strategies (Cardiff: Cardiff University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Adams, N., Alden, J. & Harris, N. (2006) Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged EU (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Adams, N., Cotella, G. & Nunes, R. (2011) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2000) Spatial dimensions and institutional uncertainties of planning and the new regionalism. Environment and Planning C, 18, pp. 711–726. doi: 10.1068/c9953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R. & Jones, B. D. (Eds) (2002) Policy Dynamics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Benz, A. (2000) Two types of multi-level governance: Inter-governmental relations in Germany and European regional policy. Regional and Federal Studies, 10(3), pp. 21–44. doi: 10.1080/13597560008421130
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K. & Waterhout, B. (2008) The Europeanisation of planning, in: A. Faludi (Ed), European Spatial Research and Planning, pp. 225–248. (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
   Google Scholar
• Capik, P. (2011) Regional promotion and competition: An examination of approaches to FDI attraction in the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia. in: N. Adams, G. Cotella & R. Nunes (Eds) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, pp. 320–344. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2008) Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion—Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength (Brussels: Commission of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2011) Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion: Investing in Europe’s Future (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Clarence, E. (2002) Technocracy reinvented: The new evidence based policy movement. Public Policy and Administration, 17(1), pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1177/095207670201700301
   Google Scholar
• COMMIN (undated) Baltic Sea Conceptshare National Spatial Planning Systems. Available at http://commin.org/en/planning-systems/national-planning-systems/nations.html (accessed March 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Cotella, G. (2009) Governance territoriale comunitaria e sistemi di pianificazione: Riflessioni sull'allargamento ad est dell'Unione europea, PhD dissertation, Inter-university department of territorial studies and planning, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Cotella, G. & Janin Rivolin, U. (2010) Institutions, Discourse and Practices: Towards a Multi-dimensional Understanding of EU Territorial Governance, Paper Presented at the 24th AESOP Congress, Helsinki (Finland), 7–10 July 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cotella, G., Janin Rivolin, U. & Reimer, M. (2011) Structure, tools, discourse and practices: A multi-dimensional comparative approach to EU territorial governance. Paper Presented at the 3rd World Planning Schools Congress, Perth, Western Australia, 4–8 July 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cotella, G., Adams, N. & Nunes, R. (2012) Engaging in European spatial planning: A central and Eastern European perspective on the territorial cohesion debate. European Planning Studies, 20(7), pp. 1197–1220. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.673567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagliene, G. (2006) The response to regional disparities in Lithuania. in: N. Adams, J. Alden & N. Harris (Eds) Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged EU, pp. 221–240. (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• EC (2009) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions concerning the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/communic/baltic/com_baltic_en.pdf (accessed March 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Estonian Ministry of Interior (2009) Estonia's contribution regarding Commission communication, Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion—Turning territorial diversity into strength. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/consultation/terco/contrib_en.htm (accessed February 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Estonian Ministry of the Environment (2001) Estonia 2010 National Spatial Plan (Tallinn: Ministry of the Environment).
   Google Scholar
• EUA (2011) Impact of the economic crisis on European universities. Available at http://www.eua.be/news/09-11-13/EUA_delegation_visit_to_Latvia_focuses_on_higher_education_funding_and_reforms.aspx (accessed January 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat (2011) Available at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/ (accessed February 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Evers, D. (2007) Reflections on territorial cohesion and European spatial planning. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99(3), pp. 303–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00463.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers, D., Tennekes, J., Borsboom, J., Heiligenberg, H. & Van Den, Thissen, M. (2009) A Territorial Impact Assessment of Territorial Cohesion for the Netherlands, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL). Available at http://www.eukn.org/binaries/eukn/netherlands/research/2009/07/tia_tc_webversie.pdf (accessed March 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2008) The learning machine: European integration in the planning mirror. Environment and Planning A, 40(6), pp. 1470–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2009) Territorial Cohesion under the Looking Glass, Synthesis paper about the history of the concept and policy background to territorial cohesion. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/consultation/terco/pdf/lookingglass.pdf (accessed February 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. & Waterhout, B. (2006) Introducing evidence-based planning. disP, 165(2), pp. 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. (2011) Interfaces of European union internal and external territorial governance: The Baltic Sea region. in: N. Adams, G. Cotella & R. Nunes (Eds) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, pp. 382–401. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. (1990) When Knowledge is Power (Berkley CA: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. (1992) Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), pp. 1–35. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. (2004) When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), pp. 569–592. doi: 10.1080/1350176042000248034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HU Presidency (2011) Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Available at http://www.eu2011.hu/files/bveu/documents/TA2020.pdf (accessed July 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. (2010) EU territorial governance, learning from institutional progress. European Journal of Spatial Development, 38, pp. 1–28
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. & Richardson, T. (2004) Making European Space (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1995) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies (New York: Harper Collins).
   Google Scholar
• Krizek, K., Forysth, A. & Slotterback, C. S. (2009) Is there a role for evidence-based practice in Urban planning and policy?. Planning Theory and Practice, 10(4), pp. 459–478. doi: 10.1080/14649350903417241
   Google Scholar
• Kule, L., Krisjane, Z. & Berzins, M. (2011) The rhetoric and reality of pursuing territorial cohesion in Latvia. in: N. Adams, G. Cotella & R. Nunes (Eds) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, pp. 291–319. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Laeken European Council (2001) Presidency Conclusions: European Council meeting in Laeken, 14 and 15 December. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/background/docs/laeken_concl_en.pdf (accessed March 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Larner, W. & Laurie, N. (2010) Travelling technocrats, embodied knowledges: Globalising privatisation in telecoms and water. Geoforum, 41, pp. 218–216. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lieven, A. (1993) The Baltic Revolution: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania and the Path to Independence (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lithuanian Ministry of Finance (2009) Conclusions of Lithuania’s Public Discussions on Issues Raised in the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/consultation/terco/contrib_en.htm (accessed February 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lithuanian Ministry of the Environment (2002) Comprehensive Plan of the Territory of the Republic of Lithuania (Vilnius: Ministry of the Environment).
   Google Scholar
• Maier, K. (2011) The pursuit of balanced territorial development: The realities and complexities of the cohesion agenda. in: N. Adams, G. Cotella & R. Nunes (Eds) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, pp. 266–290. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• MRDLG—Latvian Ministry of Regional Development and Local Government (2009) Latvia’s Position on the European Commission’s Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion Turning Diversity into Strength. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/consultation/terco/contrib_en.htm (accessed February 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Pabriks, A. & Purs, A. (2002) Latvia's democracy examined: 1991–1999. in: D. Smith, A. Pabriks, A. Purs & T. Lane (Eds) The Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, pp. 1–169. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Pallagst, K. (2006) European spatial planning reloaded: considering EU enlargement in theory and practice. European Planning Studies, 14(2), pp. 253–272. doi: 10.1080/09654310500418259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallagst, K. (2011) The emergence of “Epistemic communities” in the New European landscape: some theoretical implications for territorial development and the spatial agenda of the EU. in: N. Adams, G. Cotella & R. Nunes (Eds) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, pp. 124–142. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• PURR (2011) Draft Final Report, Potential of Rural regions, ESPON 2013 Programme. Available at http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/TargetedAnalyses/PURR/PURR_DFR.pdf (accessed July 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (1995) The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 2(2), pp. 159–183. doi: 10.1080/13501769508406981
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (1999) The public policy of the European Union: whither politics of expertise?. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(5), pp. 757–774. doi: 10.1080/135017699343360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razumeyko, N. (2011) Strategic planning practices in North-West Russia: European influences, challenges and future perspectives. in: N. Adams, G. Cotella & R. Nunes (Eds) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, pp. 402–421. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2007) Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6(1), pp. 52–68. doi: 10.1177/1473095207075161
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1998) The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), pp. 98–130. doi: 10.1080/13501768880000051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds) (1993) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
   Google Scholar
• Saeima (2010) Latvia 2030: Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 2030, Spatial Development Perspective.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfenning, F. & Sedelmeier, U. (2005) The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1978) Generative metaphor: A perspective in policy setting in social policy. in: A. Ortony (Eds) Metaphor and Thought, pp. 137–164. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. J. (2002) Old wine in new bottles: the politics of independence. in: D. Smith, A. Pabriks, A. Purs & T. Lane (Eds) The Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, pp. 65–110. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. J., Pabriks, A., Purs, A. & Lane, T. (2002) The Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. & Cotella, G. (Eds), (2011) Differential Europe: Domestic Actors and their Role in Shaping Spatial Planning Systems, Special issue of DISP—The Planning Review, 186(3).
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. & Meijers, E. (2009) Spatial planning and policy integration: concepts, facilitators and inhibitors. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(3), pp. 317–332. doi: 10.1080/14649350903229752
   Google Scholar
• Treaty of Amsterdam (1997) Treaty of Amsterdam, Official Journal of the European Union, C 340/10. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/index.htm (accessed March 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Treaty of Lisbon (2007) Treaty of Lisbon, Official Journal of the European Union, C 306/01. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/index.htm (accessed March 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Treaty of Nice (2001) Treaty of Nice, Official Journal of the European Union, C 80/01. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/index.htm (accessed March 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. (2010) European spatial planning between competitiveness and territorial cohesion: shadows of neo-liberalism. European Planning Studies, 18(8), pp. 1301–1315. doi: 10.1080/09654311003791358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VASAB (2009) VASAB 15: From Tallinn to Vilnius, workshop working document. Available at http://www.vasab.org/conference/upload/dokumenti/vasab_15.jpg (accessed January 2011).
   Google Scholar
• VASAB (2010) VASAB Long Term Perspective for the Territorial Development of the Baltic Sea Region: Towards better territorial integration of the Baltic Sea Region and its integration with other areas of Europe. Available at http://www.vasab.org/conference/page/67 (accessed January 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B. (2008) The Institutionalisation of European Spatial Planning (Amsterdam: IOS Press).
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B. (2011) European spatial planning: current state and future challenges. in: N. Adams, G. Cotella & R. Nunes (Eds) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, pp. 84–102. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B., Mourato, J. & Böhme, K. (2009) The impact of europeanization on planning cultures. in: J. Knieling & F. Othengrafen (Eds) Planning Cultures In Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, pp. 239–254. (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. H. (1996) European Union, Spatial Policy and Planning (London: Paul Chapman).
   Google Scholar