Urban–Rural Interactions in Latvian Changing Policy and Practice Context

References

• Alaev, Ė. B. (1983) Sotsial'no-ėkonomicheskaia geografiia (Moskva: Mysl’).
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, K., Eklund, E., Lehtola, M. & Salmi, P. (2009) Introduction: Beyond the ruralurban divide, in: K. Andersson, E. Eklund, M. Lehtola & P. Salmi (Eds) Beyond the Rural–Urban Divide: Cross-Continental Perspectives on the Differentiated Countryside and Its Regulation, pp. 2–21 (Bingley: Emerald).
   Google Scholar
• Arel, D. (2002) Demography and politics in the first post-Soviet censuses: Mistrusted state, contested identities, Population, 57(6), pp. 801–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bascom, J. (2001) “Energizing” rural space: The representation of countryside culture as an economic development strategy, Journal of Cultural Geographies, 19(1), pp. 53–73. doi: 10.1080/08873630109478297
   Google Scholar
• Beitnere, D. (2003) Pašreference latviešu kultūras paradigmā (Riga: LU Filozofijas un sociolo‘gijas institūts Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte).
   Google Scholar
• Bengs, C. & Schmidt-Thomé, K. (Eds) (2005) Urban–Rural Relations in Europe: ESPON 1.1.2 Final Report (Helsinki: Centre for Urban and Regional Studies Helsinki University of Technology).
   Google Scholar
• Bleiere, D. (2005) Repressions against farmers in Latvia in 1944–1953, In V. Nollendorfs & E. Oberländer (Eds) The Hidden and Forbidden History of Latvia under Soviet and Nazi Occupations 1940–1991, pp. 242–255 (Riga: Institute of the History of Latvia).
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, K. (1998) Reflexivity, sociology and the rural–urban distinction in Marx Tonnies and Weber, Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 35(2), pp. 165–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-618X.1998.tb00227.x
   Google Scholar
• Brīvā Zeme (1938) Vasaras bērnu rajoni, Brīvā Zeme, March 25, p. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Buciega, A., Pitarch, M.-D. & Esparcia, J. (2009) The context of rural–urban relationships in Finland, France, Hungary, the Netherlands and Spain, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 11(1), pp. 9–27. doi: 10.1080/15239080902774929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, C. (1995) The myth of managed migration: migration control and market in the Soviet Period, Slavic Review, 54(4), pp. 896–916. doi: 10.2307/2501398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CM (Cabinet of Ministers) (2007) National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) 2007–2013, 23 October. Available at www.esfondi.lv (accessed 18 July 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Caffyn, A. & Dahlström, M. (2005) Urban–rural interdependencies: Joining up policy in practice, Regional Studies, 39(3), pp. 283–296. doi: 10.1080/0034340050086580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, M. L. (2004) Not by Bread Alone: Social Support in the New Russia (Ewing, NJ: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• CSBL (Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia) (2012) Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia Databases. Available at http://www.csb.gov.lv/en (accessed 18 May 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Champion, T. & Hugo, G. (2004) Introduction: Moving beyond the urban–rural dichotomy, In T. Champion & H. Graeme (Eds) New Forms of Urbanization: Beyond the Urban–Rural Dichotomy, pp. 3–24 (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. & Clark, T. L. (2009) Isolating connections—Connecting isolations, Geografiska Annaler B, 91(4), pp. 311–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2009.00324.x
   Google Scholar
• Cloke, P. & Johnston, R. (2005) Deconstructing human geography's binaries, in: P. Cloke & R. Johnston (Eds) Spaces of Geographical Thought: Deconstructing Human Geography's Binaries, pp. 1–4 (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• CSD (Committee on Spatial Development) (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• CBSS (Council of the Baltic Sea States) (2011) Strategy on Sustainable Development 2010–2015 adopted by the CBSS Committee of Senior Officials on 26 January 2011 (Stockholm: CBSS Secretariat).
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. & Stead, D. (2002) Urban–rural relationships: An introduction and a brief history, Built Environment, 28(4), pp. 269–277.
   Google Scholar
• Dematteis, G. (2001) Shifting cities, In C. Minca (Ed) Postmodern Geography: Theory and Praxis, pp. 113–128 (Oxford: Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• ECE-FAO-Eurostat-OECD (2005) Meeting on Food and Agricultural Statistics, Rome, 29 June–1 July 2005. Available at http://www.unece.org/stats/documents/2005.06.agri.htm (links, Latvia) (accessed 18 July 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Eglīte, P. (2009) A brief overview of 20th century Latvian migration studies, Folia Geographica, 14, pp. 81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, B. (2006) Public space in the Blue cities in Russia, Progress in Planning, 66(3), pp. 147–239. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2006.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission) (2010) Conclusions of the Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion (Brussels: European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• Hannerz, U. (1996) Transnational Connections (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Hidle, K., Farsund, A. A. & Lysgard, H. K. (2009) Urban–rural flows and the meaning of borders, European and Regional Studies, 16(4), pp. 409–421. doi: 10.1177/0969776409340863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugo, G., Champion, A. & Lattes, A. (2003) Toward a new conceptualization of settlements for demography, Population and Development Review, 29(2), pp. 277–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2003.00277.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2003) Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance, American Political Science Review, 97(2), pp. 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankovskis, J., Kauliņš, J., Krieviņš, M., Sīmane, M., Stūre, I., Vesperis, V., Vilks, P. & Zvīgulis, J. (2012) Nacionālā attīstības plāna 2014–2020.gadam prioritāšu pamatojuma ziņojums. Pārresoru koordinācijas centrs. Available http://www.mk.gov.lv (accessed 10 April 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Kawka, R. (2009) Growth and innovation through urban–rural partnership, In W. Strubelt (Eds) Guiding Principles for Spatial Development Germany, pp. 57–73 (Berlin: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Khorev, B. S. (1971) Problemy Gorodov (Moscow: Mysl’).
   Google Scholar
• Khorev, B. S. (1981) Territorial'naia organizatsiia obshchestva (Moskva: Mysl’).
   Google Scholar
• Kneafsey, M., Ilbery, B. & Jenkins, T. (2001) Exploring the dimensions of culture economies in rural West Wales, Sociologia Ruralis, 41(3), pp. 296–310. doi: 10.1111/1467-9523.00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krisjane, Z. (Ed) (2007) The Geographic Mobility of the Labour Force (Riga: University of Latvia).
   Google Scholar
• Kūle, L. (2010) Urban–rural interactions in Latvia, Regional Insights, 1(1), pp. 12–14. doi: 10.1080/20429843.2010.9628236
   Google Scholar
• Kūle, L., Osis, U., Stalidzāne, I., Tisenkopfs, T., Timofejevs, A. & Timofejevs, K. (2009) Pētījums “Latvijas pilsētu un lauku mijiedarbības izvērtējums” (Riga: Konsorts, Valsts re‘gionālās attīstības a‘gentūra).
   Google Scholar
• Latvijas Valsts prezidenta kanceleja (2013) Kārlis Ulmanis: Latvijas Valsts prezidents 1936–1940. Available at http://www.president.lv/pk/content/?cat_id=910 (accessed 12 February 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Loks, J. (1930) Piešķiršanas komisijas darbība rūpniecības un citu valsts fonda objektu lietās, In A. Alberings (Eds) Latvijas Agrārā reforma, pp. 552–556 (Rīga: Zemkopības ministrija).
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, S. (2002) Soviet exurbia: Dachas in postwar Russia, In D. Crowley & S. E. Reid (Eds) Socialist Spaces: Sites of Everyday Life in the Eastern Bloc, pp. 105–121 (New York: Berg).
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, T., Murdoch, J., Lowe, P., Munton, R. & Flynn, A. (1993) Constructing the Countryside (London: University College of London).
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1969[1848]) Manifesto of the Communist Party (Moscow: Progress Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, V. P. (1971) Towards a typology of urban–rural relationships, The Professional Geographer, 23(4), pp. 319–323. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1971.00319.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misiunas, R. J. & Taagepera, R. (1983) The Baltic States: Years of Dependence 1940–1980 (Berkeley: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, R. E. (1966) The rural–urban continuum, Sociologia Ruralis, 6(4), pp. 299–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1966.tb00537.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PKC (Pārresoru koordinācijas centrs) (2012) Nacionālā attīstības plāna 2014–2020. gadam 1.redakcija. Available at http://www.nap.lv (accessed 25 May 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Piveteau, V. (2006) Town-country relations, a new issue in public policies, In N. Bertrand & V. Kreibich (Eds) Europes's City-Regions Competitiveness, pp. 50–60 (Assen: van Gorcum).
   Google Scholar
• Potter, R. B. & Unwin, T. (1995) Urban–rural interaction: Physical form and political process in the Third World, Cities, 12(1), pp. 67–73. doi: 10.1016/0264-2751(95)91866-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, D. (1975) Rural–urban and intersettlement interaction: Theory and analytical structure, Area, 7(3), pp. 171–174.
   Google Scholar
• Riga City Council (2001) Rīgas vides pārskats (Riga: Riga City Council).
   Google Scholar
• Rigg, J. (1998) Rural–urban interactions, agriculture and wealth: A Southeast Asian Perspective, Progress in Human Geography, 22(4), pp. 497–522. doi: 10.1191/030913298667432980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosado, C. (2008) Context determines content: Quantum physics as a framework for “wholeness” in urban transformation, Urban Studies, 45(10), pp. 2075–2097. doi: 10.1177/0042098008094874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeima (2010) Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 2030, 10 June. Available at http://www.latvija2030.lv (accessed 18 July 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. A. (1998) Theory of the urban web, Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), pp. 53–72. doi: 10.1080/13574809808724416
   Google Scholar
• Schaffter, M., Fall, J. J. & Debarbieux, B. (2010) Unbounded boundary studies and collapsed categories: Rethinking spatial objects, Progress in Human Geography, 34(2), pp. 254–262. doi: 10.1177/0309132509105009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, K. Z. S. (2006) Nature and National Identity after Communism: Globalizing the Ethnoscape (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press).
   Google Scholar
• Shelley, L. I. (1984) Urbanization and crime: The Soviet experience, in: H. W. Morton & R. C. Stuart (Eds) Contemporary Soviet City, pp. 113–128 (New York; M.E. Sharpe).
   Google Scholar
• Shields, R. (1997) Flow as a new paradigm, Space and Culture, 1(1), pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1177/120633129700100101
   Google Scholar
• Southworth, C. (2006) The dacha debate: Household agriculture and labor markets in post-socialist Russia, Rural Sociology, 71(3), pp. 451–478. doi: 10.1526/003601106778070671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SRDA (State Regional Development Agency) (2011) Development of Regions in Latvia 2010 (Riga: State Regional Development Agency).
   Google Scholar
• Stramentov, A. E. (1963) Vedenie v gorodskoe stroitel'stvo (Moskva: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo literatury po stroitel'stvu, akhitekture i stroitel'nim materialam).
   Google Scholar
• SPESP (Study Program on European Spatial Planning) (2001) Final Report (Bonn: Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing).
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2004) Connections, Environment and Planning D, Society and Space, 22(1), pp. 27–37. doi: 10.1068/d322t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdības Vēstnesis (1938) Noteikumi par pilsētu iedzīvotāju bērnu novietošanu atpūtā pie lauku iedzīvotājiem1938.gada vasarā, Valdības Vēstnesis, April 4.
   Google Scholar
• Vision and strategies around the Baltic Sea (VASAB) (2009) Vilnius Declaration: Towards Better Territorial Integration of the Baltic Sea Region. Available at http://www.vasab.org/conference/page/67 (accessed 18 July 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Voas, D. & Williamson, P. (2001) The diversity of diversity: A critique of geodemographic classification, Area, 33(1), pp. 63–76. doi: 10.1111/1475-4762.00009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegren, S. (2001) Democratization and Urban Bias in Post-Communist Russia (Washington, DC: National Council for Eurasian and East European Research).
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M. (2009) Rural geography: Blurring boundaries and making connections, Progress in Human Geography, 33(6), pp. 849–858. doi: 10.1177/0309132508105001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaslavsky, V. (1980) Socioeconomic inequality and changes in Soviet ideology, Theory and Society, 9(2), pp. 383–407. doi: 10.1007/BF00207283
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, W. & Stead, D. (2007) European territorial cooperation and the concept of urban–rural relationships, Planning Practice & Research, 22(3), pp. 439–453. doi: 10.1080/02697450701666787
   Google Scholar