Cost Efficiency, Urban Patterns and Population Density When Providing Public Infrastructure: A Stochastic Frontier Approach

References

• Abrate, G., Erbetta, F. & Fraquelli, G. (2011) Public utility planning and cost efficiency in a decentralized regulation context: The case of the Italian integrated water service, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 35(3), pp. 227–242. doi: 10.1007/s11123-010-0192-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aigner, D. J., Lovell, C. A. K. & Schmidt, P. (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models, Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), pp. 21–37. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
   Google Scholar
• Batten, F. D. & Karlsson, C. (Eds) (1996) Infrastructure and the Complexity of Economic Development (Berlin: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, A., Harris, T. R., Narayanan, R. & Raffiee, K. (1995) Allocative efficiency of rural water Nevada water systems: A hedonic shadow cost function approach, Journal of Regional Science, 35(3), pp. 485–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1995.tb01416.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, J. L.T. & Lovell, C. A. K. (2000) Introductory and methodological issues. Performance assessment in the public sector, in: J. L. T. Blank (Ed.) Public Provision and Performance. Contributions from Efficiency and Productivity Measurement, pp. 3–22 (Amsterdam: Elsevier).
   Google Scholar
• Bohrnstedt, G. & Goldberger, A. (1969) On the exact covariance of products of random variables, American Statistical Association Journal, 64(328), pp. 1439–1442. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1969.10501069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottasso, A. & Conti, M. (2003), Cost inefficiency in the english and Welsh water industry: An heteroskedastic stochastic cost frontier approach, Economics Discussion Papers 573, University of Essex (UK), Department of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Bottasso, A. & Conti, M. (2009) Scale economies, technology and technical change in the water industry: Evidence from the English water only sector, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(2), pp. 138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BPCCL (2004) Base de precios de la construcción de castilla y León. Instituto de la construcción de castilla y León (Valladolid: Junta de Castilla y León).
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, P., Marques, R. C. & Berg, S. (2012) A meta-regression analysis of benchmarking studies on water utilities market structure, Utilities Policy, 21(June), pp. 40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2011.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R. & Trethway, M. W. (1984) Economies of density versus economies of scale: Why trunk and local service airline costs differ, Rand Journal of Economics, 15(4), pp. 471–489. doi: 10.2307/2555519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., Trethway, M. W. & Windle, R. J. (1985) Network effects and the measurement of returns to scale and density for U.S. railroads, in: A. F. Daugherty (Ed.) Analytical Studies in Transport Economics, pp. 97–120 (New York: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. R., Jorgenson, D. & Lau, L. J. (1971) Conjugate duality and the transcendental logarithmic production function, Econometrica, 39(4), pp. 255–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. R., Jorgenson, D. & Lau, L. J. (1973) Transcendental logarithmic production frontiers, Review of Economics and Statistics, 55(1), pp. 28–45. doi: 10.2307/1927992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloke, P. J. (Ed.) (1987) Rural Planning. Policy into Action? (London: Harper and Row).
   Google Scholar
• CNIG (2001) Mapas Digitales de los Municipios Españoles (Madrid: Centro Nacional de Información Geográfica, Ministerio de Fomento).
   Google Scholar
• Coelli, T. J. & Battese, G. E. (1996) Identification of factors which influence the technical efficiency of Indian Farmers, Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40(2), pp. 19–44.
   Google Scholar
• Coelli, T. & Walding, S. (2005), Performance Measurement in the Australian Water Supply Industry, CEPA Working Papers Series WP012005, School of Economics, University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP). Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. (2001) Unity, Solidarity, Diversity for Europe, its People and its Territory, Second Report on Economic and Social Cohesion (COM2001) 24 final, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Deller, S. C., Chicoine, D. L. & Walzer, N. (1988) Economies of scale and scope in rural low-volume roads, Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(3), pp. 459–465. doi: 10.2307/1926784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberts, R. W. & McMillen, D. P. (1999) Agglomeration economies and urban public infrastructure, in: E. S. Mills & P. Cheshire (Eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, pp. 1455–1498 (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V).
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2003) Unfinished business: European Spatial Planning in the 2000s, Town Planning Review, 74(1), pp. 121–140. doi: 10.3828/tpr.74.1.7
   Google Scholar
• Filippini, M., Hrovatin, N. & Zoric, J. (2004) Efficiency and regulation of the Slovenian electricity distribution companies, Energy policy, 32(3), pp. 335–344. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00295-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippini, M., Hrovatin, N. & Zoric, J. (2008) Cost efficiency of Slovenian water distribution utilities: An application of stochastic frontier methods, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 29(2), pp. 169–182. doi: 10.1007/s11123-007-0069-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, J. E. (1989) The Costs of Alternative Development Patterns: A Review of the Literature (Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute).
   Google Scholar
• García, S. & Thomas, A. (2001) The structure of municipal water supply costs: Application to a panel of French local communities, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 16(1), pp. 5–29. doi: 10.1023/A:1011142901799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, S. & Thomas, A. (2003) Regulation of public utilities under asymmetric information. The case of municipal water supply in France, Environmental and Resource Economics, 26(1), pp. 145–162. doi: 10.1023/A:1025629503671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Gomez, F. & García-Rubio, M. A. (2008) Efficiency in the management of urban water services. What have we learned after four decades of research?, Hacienda Pública Española/ Revista de Economía Pública, 185(2), pp. 39–67.
   Google Scholar
• INE (2003) Nomenclátor (Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística).
   Google Scholar
• INE (2004) Padrón Municipal de Habitantes (Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística).
   Google Scholar
• Kalb, A. (2010) Public Sector and Efficiency. Applications to Local Governments in Germany (Germany: Gabler Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Kumbhakar, S. C. & Lovell, C. A.K. (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• LA CAIXA. (2000) Anuario Comercial de España. Servicio de Estudios. Available at http://www.anuarieco.lacaixa (accessed 2004).
   Google Scholar
• Lai, H. & Huang, C. J. (2010) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection of stochastic frontier models, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(1), pp. 3–13. doi: 10.1007/s11123-009-0160-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAP (2005) Encuesta de Infraestructura y Equipamientos Locales, Fase de 2000 (Madrid: Ministerio de Administraciones Públicas).
   Google Scholar
• Marques, R. C. & De Witte, K. (2011) Is big better? On scale and scope economies in the Portuguese water sector, Economic Modelling, 28(3), pp. 1009–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2010.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MFOM (2000) La Ciudad y los Ciudadanos. Ministerio de Fomento. Dirección General de la Vivienda, la Arquitectura y el Urbanismo (Madrid: Centro de Publicaciones).
   Google Scholar
• Mizutani, F. & Urakami, T. (2001) Identifying network density and scale economies for Japanese water supply organizations, Papers in Regional Science, 80(2), pp. 211–230. doi: 10.1007/PL00013622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2001) Measuring Productivity. Measurement of Aggregate and Industry Level Productivity Growth (Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development).
   Google Scholar
• Panzar, J. C. & Willig, R. D. (1977) Economies of scale in multioutput production, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(3), pp. 481–493. doi: 10.2307/1885979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubiera, F. (2007) Factors of Employment Creation at Local Level. An Intraregional Explanation of the Different Territorial Patterns of Employment and Population in Spain, in: Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional in: (Ed.), pp. 1–29 (León: XXXIII Reunión de Estudios Regionales).
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, J. & Frohberg, K. (2007) Allocative efficiency of rural water supply—a globally flexible SGM cost frontier, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 27(1), pp. 31–40. doi: 10.1007/s11123-006-0024-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalensee, R. (1978) A note of economies of scale and natural monopoly in the distribution of public utility services, The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(1), pp. 270–276. doi: 10.2307/3003626
   Google Scholar
• SIEMCALSA (1997) Mapa Geológico y Minero de Castilla y León (Valladolid: Sociedad de Investigación y Explotación Minera de Castilla y León, Siemcalsa).
   Google Scholar
• SIMAR, L. (1992) Estimating efficiencies from frontier models with panel data: A comparison of parametric, non-parametric and semi-parametric methods with bootstrapping, Journal of productivity analysis, 3(1–2), pp. 171–203. doi: 10.1007/BF00158775
   Google Scholar
• Torres, M. & Morrison, P. C. J. (2006) Driving forces of consolidation or fragmentation of the water utility industry: A cost function approach with endogenous output, Journal of Urban Economics, 59(1), pp. 104–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2005.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong, Q. H. (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and nonnested hypotheses, Econometrica, 57(2), pp. 307–333. doi: 10.2307/1912557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar