The European Union and Major Infrastructure Policies: The Reforms of the Trans-European Networks Programmes and the Implications for Spatial Planning

References

• Badenoch, A., & Fickers, A. (Eds) (2009) Materializing Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Bohme, K., & Eser, T. (2008) Territorial impact analysis of EU policies, in: A. Faludi (Ed.) European Spatial Research and Planning, pp. 43–66 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004) New State Spaces (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2007) Trans-European Networks: Towards an Integrated Approach. COM (2007) 135 final, March 21, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2008a) Trans-European Transport Network: Implementation of the Priority Projects. Progress Report, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2008b) Towards a Secure, Sustainable and Competitive Energy Network. COM (2008) 782 final, November 13, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2008c) Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion: Turning Disparity into Strength. COM (2008) 616 final, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2009a) TEN-T: A Policy Review. COM (2009) 44 final, February 4, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2009b) EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (Brussels: CEC).
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2009c) A Sustainable Future for Transport (Brussels: CEC).
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010a) Europe 2020. A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. COM (2010) 2020 final, March 3, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010b) Consultation on the Future Trans-European Transport Network Policy. Commission working document, COM (2010) 212 final, May 4, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010c) Proposal on TEN-T Network Planning, by Expert Group 1, Methodology for TEN-T Planning (Brussels: CEC).
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010d, May) The European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Background and Analysis (Brussels: CEC).
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010e) TEN-T Policy Review—Background Papers. Commission staff working document, SEC (2010) 613 final, May 11, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010f) Summary of the Impact Assessment (for Energy Infrastructure Priorities for 2020 and Beyond). SEC (2010) 1396 final, October 17, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010g) The EU Budget Review. COM (2010) 700 final, October 19, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010h) Conclusions of the Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion: The Future of Cohesion Policy. COM (2010) 642 final, November 9, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010i) Energy 2020. A Strategy for Competitive, Sustainable and Secure Energy. COM (2010) 639 final, November 10, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010j) Energy Infrastructure Priorities for 2020 and Beyond—A Blueprint for an Integrated European Energy Network. COM (2010) 677 final, November 17, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010k) European Union Strategy for the Danube Region. SEC (2010) 1489 Final, Commission Staff Working Document, December, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010l) The Future Role of Regional Initiatives. COM (2010) 721 final, December 7, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010m) Investing in Europe's Future. Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion (Brussels: CEC).
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2010n, December) EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Action Plan (Brussels: CEC).
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2011a) Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area—Towards a Competitive and Resource Efficient Transport System. COM (2011) 144 final, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2011b) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Union guidelines for the Development of the Trans-European Transport Network. COM (2011) 650 final, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2011c) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Guidelines for Trans-European Energy Infrastructure. COM (2011) 658 final, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2011d) List of Pre-identified Projects on the Core Network in the Field of Transport, part of TEN-T revision package on EU webpages: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/infrastructure/revision-t_en.htm (accessed 15 August 2012).
   Google Scholar
• CEC (2011e) Panorama, 38, p. 38, Brussels: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• Duhr, S. (2011) Baltic Sea, Danube and Macro-regional Strategies: A Model for Transnational Cooperation in the EU? (Brussels: Notre Europe).
   Google Scholar
• Duhr, S., Colomb, C., & Nadin, V. (2010) European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• ENTSO-E (2012) Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2012 (Brussels: ENTSO-E).
   Google Scholar
• ENTSOG (2011) Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2011–2020 (Brussels: ENTSO-G).
   Google Scholar
• European Round Table of Industrialists (1984) Missing Links (Brussels: ERT).
   Google Scholar
• European Round Table of Industrialists (1991) Missing Networks (Brussels: ERT).
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2010) Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation. European Spatial Planning Coming of Age? (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., & Waterhout, B. (2002) The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective—Not a Master Plan! (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, T. (2012) Best value for the taxpayer?, Town and Country Planning, 81(2), pp. 70–73.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, T., & Sykes, O. (2009, April) The TEN-T—an environmental pitch, Town and Country Planning, 78(4), pp. 198–200.
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, M. (2012) Defending Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003) Megaprojects and Risk (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2007) Why We Hate politics (Cambridge: Polity).
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. (Ed.) (2010) Neue Rahmenbedingungen, Herausforderungen und Strategien fur die grossraumige Verkehrsentwicklung (Hanover: ARL).
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury (2010) National Infrastructure Plan (London: HM Treasury).
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury (2011) National Infrastructure Plan (London: HM Treasury).
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons, Select Committee on Energy and Climate Change (2011) A European Supergrid. Seventh Report of Session 2010-12, London: House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O., & Richardson, T. (2004) Making European Space (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State (Cambridge: Polity).
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2008) State Power (Cambridge: Polity).
   Google Scholar
• Knippschild, R. (2011) With “regional territory agendas” towards territorial cohesion?, Studies in Agricultural Economics, 113(2), pp. 133–137. doi: 10.7896/j.1108
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. (2012a) Planning Major Infrastructure (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. (2012b) Infrastructure planning UK style, Town and Country Planning, 81(2), pp. 74–76.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2004) New Europe: Imagined Spaces (London: Arnold).
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., & Schmitt, P. (2012) When soft spaces harden: The EU strategy for the Baltic Sea, Environment and Planning A, 44(2), pp. 263–280. doi: 10.1068/a44188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEA (2010) Ports and their Connections within the TEN-T (Zoetermeer: NEA).
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2006) Infrastructure to 2030. Telecom, Land Transport, Water and Electricity (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2007) Infrastructure to 2030. Mapping Policy for Electricity, Water and Transport (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2011) Strategic Transport Infrastructure Needs to 2030. Main Findings (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Peters, D. (2003) Cohesion, polycentricity, missing links and bottlenecks: Conflicting spatial storylines for pan-European transport investments, European Planning Studies, 11(3), pp. 317–339. doi: 10.1080/09654310303638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priemus, H., Flyvbjerg, B., & van Wee, B. (Eds) (2008) Decision-Making on Mega-Projects: Cost-Benefit Analysis, Planning and Innovation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Ramboll/Mercados (2008) TEN-E Energy Priority Corridors for Energy Transmission. Report for European Commission, November.
   Google Scholar
• Roland Berger (2011) Permitting Procedures for Energy Infrastructure Projects in the EU: Evaluation and Legal Recommendations (Berlin: Roland Berger strategy consultants).
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2010) The Representative Claim (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schipper, F., & van der Vleuten, E. (2008) Trans-European Network Development and Governance in Historical Perspective, Network Industries Quarterly, 20(3), pp. 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Scoppetta, C. (2012) Synaptic Spaces of Europe: A Challenge for Spatial Planning. Paper presented at AESOP Congress, Ankara, July 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sielker, F. (2012) The EU Strategy for the Danube Region—The Emergence of Soft Spaces and the Role of Actors. Paper presented at AESOP Congress, Ankara, July 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2011) European macro-regional strategies: Indications of spatial rescaling?, Planning Theory and Practice, 12(1), pp. 163–167. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2011.545664
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (1997) Neither global nor local: “Glocalization” and the politics of scale, in: K. Cox (Ed.) Spaces of Globalization; Reassessing the Power of the Local, pp. 137–166 (New York: Guildford).
   Google Scholar
• Transport and Environment, CEE, Birdlife (2011) Briefing. Transport in the EU Budget: Making Spending Sustainable (Brussels: T and E).
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vleuten, E., & Kaijser, A. (Eds) (2006) Networking Europe (Sagamore Beach: Science History).
   Google Scholar
• VASAB (2009) VASAB Long-Term Perspective for the Territorial Development of the Baltic Sea Region, Background Synthesis Document (Riga: VASAB Secretariat).
   Google Scholar
• VASAB (2010) VASAB Long-Term Perspective for the Territorial Development of the Baltic Sea Region (Riga: VASAB Secretariat).
   Google Scholar